CensusEasy
RANKING · 2020 CENSUS · 161 SHOWN OF 661

Lowest labor force participation, California cities · 2020

California cities with the smallest share of adults 16+ in the civilian labor force (2020 ACS).

Flip the list · Highest labor force participation, US cities →
CaliforniaAll statesPop > 5KAll rankings
Lowest labor force participation by state
RANKPLACESTATEPOPLABOR FORCE PARTICIPATIONVS –
501Rancho Cucamonga, CACA177,85666.2%–
502Rosedale, CACA18,87766.2%–
503Walnut Park, CACA14,95866.3%–
504Calabasas, CACA22,02766.3%–
505Upland, CACA79,44666.3%–
506San Martin, CACA6,95466.3%–
507Arcata, CACA19,04766.3%–
508Citrus, CACA10,90466.4%–
509Simi Valley, CACA124,86166.4%–
510Larkfield-Wikiup, CACA8,76566.4%–
511Huntington Beach, CACA191,45166.4%–
512Downey, CACA108,46866.4%–
513San Marcos, CACA94,90866.4%–
515Chula Vista, CACA275,53366.5%–
516Huntington Park, CACA51,54466.5%–
517West Athens, CACA8,72666.5%–
518Los Angeles, CACA3,869,08966.5%–
519National City, CACA57,80766.6%–
520Ashland, CACA22,21066.6%–
521Saranap, CACA5,66266.6%–
522Santa Rosa, CACA179,43766.6%–
523Long Beach, CACA450,46966.6%–
524Moorpark, CACA35,02366.6%–
525Lakewood, CACA78,01066.6%–
526Stanton, CACA40,16166.6%–
527Rancho Cordova, CACA87,55466.6%–
528Santa Barbara, CACA86,42266.6%–
529Bellflower, CACA74,71966.7%–
530Rosemont, CACA23,76666.7%–
531Burbank, CACA102,98866.7%–
532Santa Maria, CACA111,39066.8%–
533Laguna Hills, CACA30,02066.9%–
534Old Fig Garden, CACA5,50366.9%–
535Williams, CACA5,52966.9%–
536Sierra Madre, CACA10,62066.9%–
537Capitola, CACA9,34066.9%–
538Stevenson Ranch, CACA20,99067.0%–
539Inglewood, CACA101,66267.0%–
540Foster City, CACA32,41167.0%–
541Santa Clarita, CACA228,43067.0%–
542Ontario, CACA187,01367.1%–
543Anaheim, CACA341,00867.1%–
544Signal Hill, CACA11,15367.1%–
545Ben Lomond, CACA6,85867.1%–
546Milpitas, CACA78,59667.2%–
547Oceanside, CACA170,48367.3%–
548Fremont, CACA226,44267.3%–
549Vista, CACA98,27467.3%–
550Charter Oak, CACA9,44267.3%–
551Covina, CACA49,40467.4%–
552Vincent, CACA15,34067.4%–
553Buena Park, CACA81,74167.4%–
554Bay Point, CACA24,23167.5%–
555Hayward, CACA157,11367.5%–
556Salida, CACA13,90067.5%–
557Concord, CACA123,26167.5%–
558Castaic, CACA17,99967.6%–
559San Diego, CACA1,406,10667.6%–
561Suisun City, CACA29,45467.7%–
562Brea, CACA47,26067.8%–
563Santa Ana, CACA315,58667.8%–
564Interlaken, CACA8,06867.8%–
565Daly City, CACA101,26167.8%–
566La Riviera, CACA11,49267.8%–
567Guadalupe, CACA8,84667.9%–
568Napa, CACA76,56267.9%–
571Morgan Hill, CACA45,62568.0%–
572Imperial Beach, CACA25,20668.1%–
573Corte Madera, CACA9,92968.1%–
574Placentia, CACA54,91168.1%–
575La Mesa, CACA59,91468.2%–
576Patterson, CACA26,58768.3%–
577Hercules, CACA26,32668.3%–
578Coto de Caza, CACA15,19068.3%–
579Alum Rock, CACA10,44068.3%–
580Martinez, CACA36,84968.4%–
581La Habra, CACA60,90868.4%–
582Oxnard, CACA199,65168.4%–
583San Jose, CACA989,81468.4%–
584Ramona, CACA22,63468.5%–
585Marina, CACA23,25668.6%–
586Alameda, CACA76,87668.6%–
587South San Francisco, CACA64,94168.7%–
588Tracy, CACA101,90168.7%–
589El Granada, CACA5,23268.7%–
590Santa Monica, CACA90,08268.7%–
591Campbell, CACA42,49068.7%–
592Oakland, CACA440,83868.8%–
593Eastvale, CACA70,59468.9%–
594Albany, CACA19,19569.0%–
595American Canyon, CACA22,77369.0%–
596Gilroy, CACA60,76469.0%–
597Hollister, CACA45,69569.0%–
598Pacifica, CACA36,89069.1%–
599San Ramon, CACA86,20969.1%–
600Hawthorne, CACA82,74169.2%–
601Lennox, CACA19,44969.3%–
602Monterey, CACA28,95369.3%–
603Goshen, CACA5,13669.3%–
604Oakley, CACA47,58369.3%–
605North Fair Oaks, CACA13,10069.4%–
606Port Hueneme, CACA20,98769.4%–
607Grover Beach, CACA12,45669.4%–
608Newark, CACA47,89569.4%–
609Tustin, CACA77,84369.5%–
610Fairfax, CACA7,41769.6%–
611South Lake Tahoe, CACA21,11569.7%–
612Truckee, CACA17,27869.7%–
613Culver City, CACA39,45269.7%–
614Dublin, CACA71,60269.9%–
615Windsor, CACA25,86470.0%–
616Lake Forest, CACA86,33370.1%–
617Cotati, CACA7,34770.1%–
618Del Aire, CACA11,11570.2%–
619Goleta, CACA32,40170.2%–
620Santa Clara, CACA133,44670.3%–
621Rancho Mission Viejo, CACA11,97170.3%–
622San Mateo, CACA103,33770.5%–
623Livermore, CACA83,45770.7%–
624Coachella, CACA45,41170.7%–
625Rohnert Park, CACA44,81170.8%–
626Dixon, CACA21,11670.9%–
627Belmont, CACA28,75271.1%–
628Ladera Ranch, CACA23,79371.1%–
629San Francisco, CACA826,07971.2%–
630Twentynine Palms, CACA25,93971.2%–
631Redwood City, CACA82,17871.4%–
632South Pasadena, CACA25,50371.7%–
633Sunnyvale, CACA156,57771.7%–
634Highgrove, CACA8,36671.9%–
635East Palo Alto, CACA28,87271.9%–
636Burlingame, CACA31,92972.0%–
637Lawndale, CACA29,89272.1%–
639San Bruno, CACA42,30572.4%–
640Costa Mesa, CACA108,88172.7%–
641San Carlos, CACA29,26172.8%–
642Buellton, CACA5,15873.1%–
643Rancho Santa Margarita, CACA45,77973.2%–
644Mountain View, CACA85,43873.4%–
645Redondo Beach, CACA67,28173.5%–
646Plumas Lake, CACA9,41874.0%–
647San Anselmo, CACA12,55574.1%–
648Hermosa Beach, CACA18,51374.4%–
649El Segundo, CACA16,37974.9%–
650Winters, CACA8,21475.0%–
651Emeryville, CACA13,25175.7%–
652Aliso Viejo, CACA49,84475.9%–
653Burbank, CACA5,33377.7%–
654Contra Costa Centre, CACA6,89378.7%–
655Camp Pendleton South, CACA15,76678.7%–
656Mammoth Lakes, CACA6,86778.7%–
657West Hollywood, CACA34,23179.4%–
658Marina del Rey, CACA9,17681.3%–
659Lemoore Station, CACA6,17584.5%–
660Fort Irwin, CACA8,41986.5%–
661Camp Pendleton Mainside, CACA9,50188.3%–
SHOWING 501–661 OF 661

UPDATED 2026-09-11 · DATA: US CENSUS BUREAU DECENNIAL CENSUS