RANKING · 2024 ACS · 97 SHOWN OF 97

Lowest labor force participation, Utah cities

Utah cities with the smallest share of adults 16+ in the civilian labor force (2023 ACS). This list covers the 97 cities in Utah that qualify, ranked against each other statewide.

Flip the list · Highest labor force participation, US cities →

UtahAll statesPop > 5KAll rankings

SAME RANKING BYCounties States Metros ZIP codes

YEAR2020 2024

RANKPLACESTATEPOPLABOR FORCE PARTICIPATIONVS 2000

01Ivins, UTUT11,54647.4%–

02Hurricane, UTUT25,74554.0%–

03Alpine, UTUT10,44457.8%–

04Price, UTUT8,36857.9%–

05St. George, UTUT108,71358.7%–

06Washington, UTUT37,10759.8%–

07Richfield, UTUT8,47860.0%–

08Kanab, UTUT5,33261.4%–

09Midway, UTUT6,01161.6%–

10Mapleton, UTUT16,27562.3%–

11Brigham City, UTUT20,63362.4%–

12Vernal, UTUT10,67162.5%–

13Ephraim, UTUT6,39363.3%–

14West Bountiful, UTUT5,93163.4%–

15Providence, UTUT9,53963.6%–

16Santa Clara, UTUT8,72263.6%–

17Highland, UTUT21,57163.6%–

18Lindon, UTUT12,01564.1%–

19Fruit Heights, UTUT5,95264.2%–

20Washington Terrace, UTUT9,07564.3%–

21Holladay, UTUT31,16265.1%–

22Cedar Hills, UTUT9,75565.1%–

23Centerville, UTUT16,48065.3%–

24Farmington, UTUT26,26665.3%–

25Enoch, UTUT8,84765.4%–

26Roosevelt, UTUT7,03265.9%–

27Cedar City, UTUT41,87166.3%–

28Riverdale, UTUT9,20666.6%–

29Pleasant View, UTUT11,42366.6%–

30Hyde Park, UTUT5,78667.0%–

31Park City, UTUT8,58767.1%–

32Bountiful, UTUT44,98867.3%–

33Kaysville, UTUT33,30767.7%–

34Draper, UTUT50,65268.1%–

35North Logan, UTUT11,60868.3%–

36Pleasant Grove, UTUT37,77368.7%–

37Clearfield, UTUT35,14468.8%–

38Hooper, UTUT9,74169.0%–

39South Ogden, UTUT17,71069.1%–

40Ogden, UTUT89,51069.1%–

41Perry, UTUT6,22669.2%–

42Hyrum, UTUT11,13269.3%–

43Sandy, UTUT92,38669.4%–

44South Weber, UTUT8,21869.6%–

45Cottonwood Heights, UTUT32,26569.7%–

46Payson, UTUT24,63069.8%–

47Murray, UTUT53,29769.9%–

48Magna metro, UTUT35,40169.9%–

49Moab, UTUT5,20669.9%–

50Millcreek, UTUT63,92669.9%–

51North Ogden, UTUT21,68970.0%–

52Plain City, UTUT9,25670.2%–

53Clinton, UTUT23,79770.4%–

54Snyderville, UTUT5,94870.4%–

55Taylorsville, UTUT57,48470.7%–

56South Jordan, UTUT87,61470.9%–

57Smithfield, UTUT15,15371.0%–

58Spanish Fork, UTUT48,83771.4%–

59Tooele, UTUT42,27071.5%–

60Springville, UTUT35,67071.5%–

61Nephi, UTUT7,48871.5%–

62Tremonton, UTUT12,93471.7%–

63Orem, UTUT95,21471.7%–

64Summit Park, UTUT8,53771.9%–

65Salem, UTUT12,23472.1%–

66White City metro, UTUT5,14672.1%–

67Roy, UTUT38,79472.4%–

68Grantsville, UTUT16,47272.5%–

69American Fork, UTUT41,02072.6%–

70Layton, UTUT85,30872.7%–

71Saratoga Springs, UTUT61,39772.8%–

72Provo, UTUT114,52772.8%–

73Riverton, UTUT47,39573.0%–

74North Salt Lake, UTUT23,58873.0%–

75Salt Lake City, UTUT218,42873.0%–

76West Valley City, UTUT137,49173.1%–

77Farr West, UTUT8,16373.2%–

78Nibley, UTUT8,97573.2%–

79West Haven, UTUT25,62773.6%–

80Kearns metro, UTUT35,40473.8%–

81Logan, UTUT55,57673.9%–

82Santaquin, UTUT18,98974.0%–

83West Point, UTUT13,05874.5%–

84West Jordan, UTUT116,81275.5%–

85Lehi, UTUT95,31375.6%–

86Heber, UTUT19,65175.6%–

87Midvale, UTUT36,09975.7%–

88Eagle Mountain, UTUT66,55775.9%–

89Harrisville, UTUT7,15476.0%–

90Syracuse, UTUT39,90976.1%–

91Herriman, UTUT63,28276.3%–

92South Salt Lake, UTUT26,93476.5%–

93Stansbury Park, UTUT11,24276.8%–

94Sunset, UTUT5,54977.6%–

95Bluffdale, UTUT19,50678.9%–

96Woods Cross, UTUT11,42979.6%–

97Vineyard, UTUT16,09282.8%–

SHOWING 1–97 OF 97

Download CSV (full list, 97 rows)

UPDATED 2026-06-02 · DATA: US CENSUS BUREAU ACS 5-YEAR ESTIMATES