CensusEasy
RANKING · 2010 CENSUS · 114 SHOWN OF 114

Most owner cost-burdened, Massachusetts cities · 2010

Massachusetts cities ranked by the share of owner households spending 30% or more of income on housing costs (2010 ACS). This list covers the 114 cities in Massachusetts that qualify, ranked against each other statewide. The median across all 114 is 36.0%.

MassachusettsAll statesPop > 5KAll rankings
Most owner cost-burdened by state
RANKPLACESTATEPOPOWNER COST-BURDENED HOUSEHOLDSVS –
01Lawrence, MAMA89,32059.2%–
02Chelsea, MAMA40,13057.9%–
03Nantucket, MAMA10,01754.6%–
04Revere, MAMA60,14152.8%–
05Everett, MAMA53,57249.5%–
06Brockton, MAMA106,13448.9%–
07West Yarmouth, MAMA6,19447.0%–
08Scituate, MAMA5,79646.6%–
09Lynn, MAMA104,23646.1%–
10Malden, MAMA66,37045.1%–
11Barnstable, MAMA50,10144.5%–
12New Bedford, MAMA101,83443.8%–
13Holbrook, MAMA11,38043.6%–
14Gloucester, MAMA30,62743.0%–
15Hull, MAMA10,13842.5%–
16Cochituate, MAMA6,47142.3%–
17Pinehurst, MAMA6,84542.2%–
18East Harwich, MAMA5,65442.0%–
19Kingston, MAMA5,91041.7%–
20Fall River, MAMA95,29840.8%–
21Somerville, MAMA84,21140.7%–
22Boston, MAMA672,97340.7%–
23Marshfield, MAMA5,16140.6%–
24Southbridge, MAMA18,10540.4%–
25Medford, MAMA59,83440.2%–
26Maynard, MAMA10,71240.0%–
27Plymouth, MAMA7,91839.9%–
28Athol, MAMA8,80139.9%–
29Lowell, MAMA119,97139.9%–
30East Falmouth, MAMA6,24539.8%–
31Quincy, MAMA103,17339.4%–
32Saugus, MAMA28,77339.3%–
33Worcester, MAMA213,86239.1%–
34Bliss Corner, MAMA5,40538.9%–
35Taunton, MAMA62,52238.8%–
36Yarmouth Port, MAMA5,96138.7%–
37Springfield, MAMA154,70238.7%–
38Salem, MAMA45,38138.4%–
39Dedham, MAMA25,23738.2%–
40Walpole, MAMA6,46138.1%–
41Fitchburg, MAMA42,13638.1%–
42South Yarmouth, MAMA11,55237.9%–
43Attleboro, MAMA47,44737.9%–
44Waltham, MAMA65,03737.7%–
45Middleborough Center, MAMA8,15537.6%–
46Hingham, MAMA5,13037.6%–
47Lynnfield, MAMA13,06437.5%–
48Abington, MAMA17,05337.3%–
49Milford, MAMA27,73137.2%–
50Clinton, MAMA7,65837.1%–
51Holyoke, MAMA38,02337.1%–
52Stoneham, MAMA23,35536.9%–
53Salisbury, MAMA5,65636.9%–
54The Pinehills, MAMA5,28236.7%–
55Ware, MAMA6,36936.7%–
56Haverhill, MAMA68,36136.5%–
57Framingham, MAMA73,02136.0%–
58Winthrop, MAMA18,64735.8%–
59Webster, MAMA12,22835.7%–
60Woburn, MAMA43,96235.5%–
61Mansfield Center, MAMA7,22235.4%–
62Marblehead, MAMA20,41335.4%–
63Weymouth, MAMA59,75934.9%–
64Foxborough, MAMA6,25134.8%–
65Bellingham, MAMA5,32534.6%–
66Reading, MAMA25,61234.4%–
67Medfield, MAMA6,84934.3%–
68Peabody, MAMA55,95334.3%–
69Burlington, MAMA26,27434.2%–
70Swampscott, MAMA15,27734.1%–
71Beverly, MAMA43,36334.0%–
72Leominster, MAMA44,19434.0%–
73Gardner, MAMA21,48333.9%–
74Somerset, MAMA18,29833.9%–
75Danvers, MAMA28,09833.7%–
76Braintree, MAMA38,95733.4%–
77North Scituate, MAMA6,49233.1%–
78Franklin, MAMA33,95533.1%–
79Northampton, MAMA31,04733.1%–
80Hudson, MAMA15,71933.0%–
81West Concord, MAMA5,87632.8%–
82Marlborough, MAMA42,77232.7%–
83Newton, MAMA90,74132.7%–
84Newburyport, MAMA19,14832.6%–
85Cambridge, MAMA122,58832.5%–
86Chicopee, MAMA55,31032.5%–
87Pittsfield, MAMA42,90932.4%–
88Palmer, MAMA12,36732.4%–
89Norwood, MAMA31,54232.2%–
90Longmeadow, MAMA15,69632.0%–
91Melrose, MAMA29,59731.9%–
92Belmont, MAMA27,17531.8%–
93North Westport, MAMA5,28931.5%–
94Spencer, MAMA5,66131.3%–
95Wakefield, MAMA27,79331.1%–
96Arlington, MAMA46,35030.5%–
97Milton, MAMA28,58730.4%–
98Sharon, MAMA6,23230.4%–
99Agawam, MAMA28,78330.1%–
100Oxford, MAMA5,67130.1%–
101Andover, MAMA9,45129.8%–
102Needham, MAMA32,45929.5%–
103Winchester, MAMA23,40629.5%–
104Westfield, MAMA40,54628.9%–
105Brookline, MAMA63,26628.8%–
106Wellesley, MAMA30,34728.5%–
107Lexington, MAMA34,29528.3%–
108Adams, MAMA5,42728.2%–
109Wilmington, MAMA23,33627.4%–
110Whitinsville, MAMA7,11526.8%–
111Williamstown, MAMA5,07025.7%–
112Northborough, MAMA6,39225.7%–
113North Adams, MAMA12,36824.6%–
114West Springfield, MAMA28,82924.3%–
SHOWING 1–114 OF 114

UPDATED 2026-09-11 · DATA: US CENSUS BUREAU DECENNIAL CENSUS