CensusEasy
CITY · 2010 ACS

Iroquois Point

Hawaii · 3,374 residents · 0.813 sq mi
Time machine
COMPARE TO
Part of the Urban Honolulu metro area
Compare
The short version

Iroquois Point is wealthier than most US places, with a median household income of $66,607. Population has grown 37% since 2000. Renters pay a median $1,868 per month, above the US median of $853. At a median age of 27.1, residents skew younger than the country as a whole.

At a glance
Wealthier
above the US median
US median: $52,703
Younger
median age 27.1
US median: 37.2
Average education
25% hold a bachelor's degree
US average: 28%
Renter-heavy
0% owner-occupied
US average: 45%
Section 01

Population & growth

Total population
3,374
+37%since 2000
from 2,462 in 2000
1990 – 2024
Population density
4,150 / sq mi
+37%since 2000
from 3,028 / sq mi in 2000
US average: 261
Median age
27.1
+6%since 2000
from 25.5 in 2000
US average: 37.2
Population, 1990 – 2024
2K3K4K5K6K1990201020202024Iroquois Point
20245K
1990201020202024
Section 02

Income & economy

Median household income
$66,607
+19%inflation adjusted, since 2000
from $44,200 in 2000
US average: $52,703
1990 – 2024
Per capita income
$25,596
+93%since 2000
from $13,257 in 2000
US average: $27,286
Households earning $100K+
41.5%
+0.5 ptssince 2009
from 41.0% in 2009
US average: 33.3%
Poverty rate
7.2%
+5.5 ptssince 2000
from 1.8% in 2000
US average: 13.8%
Income inequality (Gini)
0.300
US average: 0.461
Workforce by industry, 2010
Information10%
US avg: 11.5%
Wholesale trade6.8%
US avg: 7.2%
Transportation & warehousing4.4%
US avg: 3.1%
Finance & insurance4.4%
US avg: 5.1%
Professional, scientific, technical4.1%
US avg: 4.2%
Other services3.1%
US avg: 7%
Retail trade2.5%
US avg: 10.9%
Arts, entertainment, food1.7%
US avg: 2.4%
Public administration1.5%
US avg: 4.9%
Education & health services0.3%
US avg: 0.9%
Agriculture, forestry, fishing0%
US avg: 1.9%
Construction0%
US avg: 1.4%
Manufacturing0%
US avg: 0.5%
BARS: THIS PLACE · TICKS: US AVERAGE
Section 03

Housing

Median gross rent
$1,868
+27%inflation adjusted, since 2000
from $1,162 in 2000
US average: $853
Owner-occupied
0.0%
−1.3 ptssince 2000
from 1.3% in 2000
99.9% rent
Vacancy rate
15.9%
−7.1 ptssince 2009
from 22.9% in 2009
US average: 12.1%
Owner cost-burdened
100.0%
Unchangedsince 2009
from 100.0% in 2009
US average: 30.9%
Renter cost-burdened
61.5%
+1.0 ptssince 2009
from 60.5% in 2009
US average: 46.8%
RELATED:See current rent listings in Iroquois Point on RentDataNow
Section 04

Race & ethnicity

2000
White, non-Hispanic74.2%(1,826)
Black5.2%(129)
Hispanic / Latino7.9%(194)
Asian4.1%(102)
Other0%
Diversity Score41.1%(1,013)
2010
White, non-Hispanic37.5%(1,265)
Black6.1%(205)
Hispanic / Latino14.9%(503)
Asian10.7%(361)
Other30.4%(1,027)
Diversity Score90.9%(3,067)
Diversity Score
91
+121%since 2000
from 41 in 2000
1990 – 2024
Section 05

Education

Bachelor's degree or higher
24.6%
−0.4 ptssince 2000
from 25.0% in 2000
US average: 27.9%
High school or higher
96.7%
−2.7 ptssince 2000
from 99.4% in 2000
US average: 84.9%
Graduate degree
5.8%
−6.8 ptssince 2000
from 12.6% in 2000
US average: 10.2%
Section 06

Commute & transportation

Average commute
37.4 min
+32%since 2000
from 28.3 min in 2000
US average: 25.2
Drive alone to work
68.2%
+1.5 ptssince 2009
from 66.7% in 2009
US average: 76.2%
Carpooled to work
12.0%
+0.4 ptssince 2009
from 11.6% in 2009
US average: 10.4%
Public transit
7.4%
−2.7 ptssince 2009
from 10.1% in 2009
US average: 4.7%
Worked from home
1.5%
Unchangedsince 2009
from 1.6% in 2009
US average: 4.1%
Walked to work
3.0%
−0.6 ptssince 2009
from 3.7% in 2009
US average: 2.8%
Biked to work
1.5%
−0.1 ptssince 2009
from 1.6% in 2009
US average: 0.5%
No vehicle available
0.9%
−0.1 ptssince 2009
from 1.0% in 2009
US average: 8.7%
Section 07

Work & employment

Self-employed
5.7%
+1.8 ptssince 2009
from 3.9% in 2009
US average: 12.9%
Management & professional
34.8%
−32.0 ptssince 2009
from 66.8% in 2009
US average: 35.2%
Section 08

People & community

Male
53.7%
−1.4 ptssince 2009
from 55.1% in 2009
Female
46.3%
+1.4 ptssince 2009
from 44.9% in 2009
Foreign born
9.4%
+0.5 ptssince 2009
from 8.9% in 2009
US average: 12.8%
Veterans
28.1%
−14.3 ptssince 2009
from 42.3% in 2009
US average: 9.9%
Drill deeper

Places similar to Iroquois Point

Clayton
Pop 4,527
Big Pine Key
Pop 4,258
Orangetree
Pop 6,084
Buckingham
Pop 4,311
Places similar to Iroquois Point
Head to head

Compare Iroquois Point to nearby cities

IROQUOIS POINT VS
Hickam Housing
Income$121,667+83%
Home value$140,600
Population9,425+83%
SEE FULL COMPARISON →
IROQUOIS POINT VS
Ewa Beach
Income$124,323+87%
Home value$748,800
Population14,376+179%
SEE FULL COMPARISON →
IROQUOIS POINT VS
Ocean Pointe
Income$149,767+125%
Home value$900,200
Population17,085+231%
SEE FULL COMPARISON →
IROQUOIS POINT VS
Ewa Gentry
Income$135,684+104%
Home value$816,000
Population26,563+415%
SEE FULL COMPARISON →
Frequently asked

How many people live in Iroquois Point, Hawaii?

Iroquois Point, Hawaii has about 3,374 residents according to the 2010 American Community Survey.

What is the median household income in Iroquois Point, Hawaii?

The typical household in Iroquois Point, Hawaii earns about $66,607 a year. Half of households make more than that, and half make less.

Is Iroquois Point, Hawaii expensive?

In Iroquois Point, Hawaii, the typical rent is about $1,868 a month.

How educated are people in Iroquois Point, Hawaii?

About 24.6% of adults age 25 and over in Iroquois Point, Hawaii hold a bachelor's degree or higher.

What is the poverty rate in Iroquois Point, Hawaii?

About 7.2% of people in Iroquois Point, Hawaii live below the federal poverty line.

Has Iroquois Point, Hawaii grown since 1990?

Yes, Iroquois Point, Hawaii has shrunk since 1990. The population has lost about 814 residents, a change of about -19 percent over that period.

Keep going

Explore from here

Up the hierarchy
Hawaii
Rankings
Highest income citiesFastest growing citiesMost educated cities
Compare
Compare Iroquois Point with another place

DATA: US CENSUS BUREAU ACS 5-YEAR + DECENNIAL CENSUS · UPDATED 2024

How we source and harmonize this data →