The most segregated metro areas in America
Milwaukee ranks first among large metros, at a score of 55.6. Segregation fell in 103 of 108 large metro areas since 2020, and a metro's diversity says almost nothing about how evenly its residents are spread.
See more of our coverage in your search results.
The Milwaukee metro area scores 55.6 on the CensusEasy Segregation Score, the highest of any US metro area with at least 500,000 residents. The score is an index of dissimilarity, a standard measure in demographic research: it says that 55.6% of Milwaukee residents would have to move to a different census tract for every neighborhood to match the metro's overall racial mix. At the other end, Spokane, Washington scores 20.1. The median large metro is at 39.5.
The score runs from 0 to 100, where 0 means every neighborhood looks like the metro as a whole and 100 means complete separation. It compares white residents who are not Hispanic against everyone else, tract by tract, across the 2020-2024 American Community Survey. It measures how people are spread out, not how many of each group live there.
The 25 most segregated large metro areas
Fourteen of the top 25 are in the Midwest or the Northeast and nine are in the South. Only two, Los Angeles and Bakersfield, are in the West. The Midwestern entries are the old manufacturing cities that drew Black workers north during the Great Migration and then hemmed them in with restrictive covenants, redlined mortgage maps, and highways routed through their neighborhoods: Cleveland, Detroit, Buffalo, St. Louis, Chicago, and Milwaukee.
| Rank | Metro area | Population | 2024 | 2020 | Change | Diversity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI | 1,575,010 | 55.6 | 58.3 | -2.8 | 61.9 |
| 2 | Memphis, TN-MS-AR | 1,341,412 | 54.9 | 56.0 | -1.2 | 73.3 |
| 3 | Cleveland, OH | 2,165,775 | 54.4 | 58.0 | -3.6 | 57.5 |
| 4 | New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ | 20,112,448 | 53.7 | 56.0 | -2.3 | 81.9 |
| 5 | Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI | 4,390,913 | 52.2 | 56.6 | -4.4 | 63.2 |
| 6 | Jackson, MS | 609,847 | 51.7 | 53.2 | -1.5 | 60.2 |
| 7 | Birmingham, AL | 1,197,766 | 51.5 | 54.6 | -3.1 | 61.7 |
| 8 | Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL | 6,391,072 | 51.3 | 52.5 | -1.1 | 75.1 |
| 9 | Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY | 1,155,653 | 51.3 | 54.7 | -3.4 | 53.7 |
| 10 | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA | 12,844,441 | 50.9 | 52.5 | -1.6 | 84.9 |
| 11 | New Orleans-Metairie, LA | 970,849 | 49.2 | 51.7 | -2.5 | 79.0 |
| 12 | St. Louis, MO-IL | 2,814,421 | 49.0 | 54.6 | -5.6 | 53.3 |
| 13 | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN | 9,434,123 | 48.7 | 51.5 | -2.8 | 80.5 |
| 14 | Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD | 6,329,118 | 48.5 | 51.9 | -3.3 | 69.4 |
| 15 | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA | 6,482,182 | 48.3 | 50.7 | -2.4 | 77.4 |
| 16 | New Haven, CT | 578,741 | 48.1 | n/a | n/a | 74.9 |
| 17 | Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD | 2,857,781 | 47.5 | 50.1 | -2.6 | 71.9 |
| 18 | Baton Rouge, LA | 888,699 | 47.3 | 50.4 | -3.1 | 69.3 |
| 19 | Bakersfield-Delano, CA | 927,068 | 47.0 | 48.9 | -1.9 | 73.4 |
| 20 | Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX | 7,904,627 | 46.2 | 49.0 | -2.8 | 85.6 |
| 21 | Bridgeport-Stamford-Danbury, CT | 978,179 | 46.0 | n/a | n/a | 76.7 |
| 22 | Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR | 777,607 | 45.9 | 46.7 | -0.8 | 61.7 |
| 23 | Rochester, NY | 1,056,149 | 45.4 | 49.2 | -3.8 | 54.0 |
| 24 | Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN | 2,205,695 | 45.3 | 49.1 | -3.8 | 58.5 |
| 25 | Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN | 2,312,858 | 44.8 | 49.6 | -4.7 | 47.8 |
Segregation fell in 103 of 108 large metro areas
Every metro in the top 25 with a 2020 score is less segregated now than it was then. Across all 108 large metros that can be compared, 103 declined and 5 rose, and the average drop was 2.7 points. St. Louis fell the most, from 54.6 to 49.0. Cincinnati fell 4.7 points and Detroit 4.4.
The five that moved the other way cluster in one place. Stockton rose 1.8 points, Modesto 1.6, Fresno and Riverside-San Bernardino 0.4 each. Four of the five are in California's Central Valley or Inland Empire, the parts of the state absorbing households priced out of the coastal metros. Palm Bay, Florida rounds out the list at 0.9.
Four years is a short window, and a 2.7-point average shift is small next to the 35-point gap between Milwaukee and Spokane. The direction is consistent, though: the same measure, the same tract boundaries, four years apart, moving down almost everywhere.
A diverse metro is not the same as an integrated one
Across the 111 large metros, the correlation between the diversity score and the segregation score is 0.16, which is close to no relationship at all. Los Angeles scores 84.9 for diversity, among the highest in the country, and 50.9 for segregation, tenth highest. Houston is the most diverse large metro at 85.6, and sits 20th for segregation at 46.2. Chicago and New York follow the same pattern.
The reverse combination exists too. Tulsa scores 71.6 for diversity and 27.2 for segregation. Seattle is at 77.6 and 29.1, Albuquerque at 76.4 and 30.5. Those metros have populations nearly as mixed as Chicago's and spread far more evenly across their neighborhoods.
The two scores answer different questions. Diversity asks who lives in the metro. Segregation asks whether they live near each other. A study of the counties that diversified most since 2000 covers the first question in detail.
The 10 least segregated large metro areas
| Rank | Metro area | Segregation | Diversity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Spokane-Spokane Valley, WA | 20.1 | 41.3 |
| 2 | Provo-Orem-Lehi, UT | 23.2 | 46.2 |
| 3 | Boise City, ID | 24.0 | 47.3 |
| 4 | Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA | 25.0 | 62.2 |
| 5 | Portland-South Portland, ME | 25.8 | 28.1 |
| 6 | Springfield, MO | 26.3 | 30.3 |
| 7 | Colorado Springs, CO | 26.4 | 64.8 |
| 8 | Tulsa, OK | 27.2 | 71.6 |
| 9 | Ogden, UT | 27.3 | 46.2 |
| 10 | Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA | 29.1 | 77.6 |
Seven of the ten are in the Mountain West or the Pacific Northwest, metros that added most of their population after the legal barriers of the mid-century era came down. Two of them, Portland, Maine and Springfield, Missouri, score under 31 for diversity, so there is less separation available to measure. Seattle and Tulsa have no such excuse.
At the county level, the Bronx leads
Metro boundaries average across suburbs and city cores. Counties cut finer, and the ranking changes: Bronx County, New York tops the list of counties with at least 250,000 residents at 62.3, above every metro in the country.
| Rank | County | Population | Segregation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bronx County, NY | 1,406,332 | 62.3 |
| 2 | Wayne County, MI | 1,769,038 | 61.0 |
| 3 | Essex County, NJ | 896,379 | 60.5 |
| 4 | Shelby County, TN | 910,226 | 60.1 |
| 5 | Passaic County, NJ | 531,624 | 59.4 |
| 6 | Orleans Parish, LA | 362,154 | 57.5 |
| 7 | DeKalb County, GA | 774,394 | 56.9 |
| 8 | Greater Bridgeport Planning Region, CT | 337,697 | 56.6 |
| 9 | Baltimore city, MD | 569,997 | 56.5 |
| 10 | Jefferson County, AL | 665,742 | 56.0 |
Without a population floor the highest scores belong to small metros around tribal land or the Texas border, where a reservation or colonia sits next to a town with a different population. Show Low, Arizona, next to the Fort Apache and Navajo reservations, scores 69.5 across 109,946 residents. Lexington, Nebraska, a meatpacking town of 26,255, scores 61.8. The full list of all 925 metros in the CSV includes them; the tables above use a floor so the comparison stays between places of similar size.
Add CensusEasy as a preferred source on Google to see our work first.
Which US metro area is the most segregated?
Among metros of at least 500,000 residents, Milwaukee-Waukesha, Wisconsin, with a segregation score of 55.6 in the 2020-2024 American Community Survey. Memphis follows at 54.9 and Cleveland at 54.4. Spokane, Washington is the least segregated at 20.1.
What does a segregation score of 55 mean?
It means about 55% of the area's residents would have to move to a different census tract for every neighborhood to match the metro's overall racial mix. The measure is the index of dissimilarity, comparing non-Hispanic white residents with everyone else.
Is segregation in the United States increasing or decreasing?
It is decreasing in most places. Of the 108 large metro areas with comparable data for both years, 103 scored lower in 2024 than in 2020, with an average drop of 2.7 points. Five rose, four of them in inland California.
The CensusEasy Segregation Score is an index of dissimilarity, the measure used in demographic research since Duncan and Duncan introduced it in 1955. For each metro area or county, it compares two groups across the census tracts inside it: white residents who are not Hispanic, and everyone else. The formula is half the sum, over every tract, of the absolute difference between that tract's share of the area's white population and its share of the area's non-white population, multiplied by 100. A score of 0 means every tract matches the area's overall split. A score of 100 means no tract contains both groups. The score is read as the percentage of residents who would have to move to a different tract to even out the distribution.
Tract race data comes from the American Community Survey 5-year estimates, which is why the score exists for 2020 and 2024 only. Both years use the same 2020-vintage tract boundaries, so the change between them reflects where people live rather than a change in the lines. Metro areas use the 2023 OMB delineations; the three Connecticut metros have no 2020 score because the state replaced its counties with planning regions in that revision, leaving no comparable earlier geography. The metro tables are limited to areas with a 2025 population estimate of at least 500,000 (111 metros) and the county table to 250,000 or more, because in small areas one reservation or one neighborhood can swing the score. The CSV carries the full universe of 925 metros with no floor. The index measures how evenly two groups are spread, not the size of either group and not any other measure of opportunity or advantage.
You may cite or republish these findings, and the downloadable dataset is licensed under CC BY 4.0. Reuse requires that you credit CensusEasy and link back to this page so readers can verify the underlying data.
CensusEasy Data Team (2026). "The most segregated metro areas in America." CensusEasy. Retrieved from https://censuseasy.com/studies/most-segregated-metro-areas-in-america
US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates, tables B03002 (race and Hispanic origin by census tract) for 2016-2020 and 2020-2024. US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Program, Vintage 2025. Metro area definitions from the Office of Management and Budget, 2023 delineation files. Otis Dudley Duncan and Beverly Duncan, "A Methodological Analysis of Segregation Indexes," American Sociological Review, 1955, for the index of dissimilarity. Scores computed by CensusEasy and published for every metro on the most segregated metros ranking and for every county on the most segregated counties ranking, with the full method at /methodology. Photo: Milwaukee skyline by Michael Barera, via Wikimedia Commons, licensed CC BY-SA 4.0, cropped to fit.
CensusEasy publishes original research grounded in US Census Bureau data. Every study includes the underlying numbers, methodology, and sources so readers can verify or extend the analysis.
Data note. Figures in this report are derived from US Census Bureau and Bureau of Labor Statistics data, including American Community Survey estimates that carry sampling margins of error. This information is provided as is, for general informational purposes, without warranty of accuracy or completeness. CensusEasy is not affiliated with or endorsed by the US Census Bureau or any government agency. See our Terms of Use for details.
