CensusEasy
CITY · 2010 ACS

Cut Bank

Montana · 2,869 residents · 1.157 sq mi
Time machine
COMPARE TO
Compare
The short version

Cut Bank has lower-than-average household income, with a median household income of $40,996. Population has declined 8% since 2000. Median home value is $69,700.

At a glance
Lower income
below the US median
US median: $52,703
Older
median age 41.2
US median: 37.2
Less educated
20% hold a bachelor's degree
US average: 28%
Stable housing
home values roughly flat, inflation adjusted
US median home: $225,659
Section 01

Population & growth

Total population
2,869
−8%since 2000
from 3,105 in 2000
1990 – 2025
Population density
2,480 / sq mi
−8%since 2000
from 2,684 / sq mi in 2000
US average: 261
Median age
41.2
+5%since 2000
from 39.2 in 2000
US average: 37.2
Population, 1990 – 2024
3K3K3K3K3K1990201020202024Cut Bank
20243K
1990201020202024
Section 02

Income & economy

Median household income
$40,996
−4%inflation adjusted, since 2000
from $33,885 in 2000
US average: $52,703
1990 – 2024
Per capita income
$20,388
+28%since 2000
from $15,977 in 2000
US average: $27,286
Households earning $100K+
22.1%
−1.0 ptssince 2009
from 23.1% in 2009
US average: 33.3%
Poverty rate
17.2%
+4.8 ptssince 2000
from 12.4% in 2000
US average: 13.8%
Income inequality (Gini)
0.410
US average: 0.461
Workforce by industry, 2010
Information13.9%
US avg: 11.5%
Agriculture, forestry, fishing11.5%
US avg: 1.9%
Manufacturing9.5%
US avg: 0.5%
Finance & insurance8.2%
US avg: 5.1%
Professional, scientific, technical5.7%
US avg: 4.2%
Other services4.5%
US avg: 7%
Public administration4.5%
US avg: 4.9%
Education & health services2.5%
US avg: 0.9%
Construction2%
US avg: 1.4%
Wholesale trade1.6%
US avg: 7.2%
Retail trade1.3%
US avg: 10.9%
Arts, entertainment, food1.2%
US avg: 2.4%
Transportation & warehousing0.7%
US avg: 3.1%
BARS: THIS PLACE · TICKS: US AVERAGE
Section 03

Housing

Median home value
$69,700
−4%inflation adjusted, since 2000
from $57,200 in 2000
US average: $225,659
1990 – 2024
Median gross rent
$577
+10%inflation adjusted, since 2000
from $414 in 2000
US average: $853
Owner-occupied
37.4%
−33.5 ptssince 2000
from 70.9% in 2000
35.9% rent
Vacancy rate
17.0%
+4.3 ptssince 2009
from 12.7% in 2009
US average: 12.1%
Owner cost-burdened
13.4%
−3.1 ptssince 2009
from 16.5% in 2009
US average: 30.9%
Renter cost-burdened
50.8%
+0.8 ptssince 2009
from 50.0% in 2009
US average: 46.8%
Afford Score
1.7
+1%since 2000
from 1.7 in 2000
1990 – 2024
RELATED:See current rent listings in Cut Bank on RentDataNow
Section 04

Race & ethnicity

2000
White, non-Hispanic82.2%(2,551)
Black0%(1)
Hispanic / Latino0.9%(28)
Asian0.2%(7)
Other0%
Diversity Score3.4%(107)
2010
White, non-Hispanic73.8%(2,118)
Black0.2%(7)
Hispanic / Latino2.5%(72)
Asian0.5%(13)
Other20.7%(593)
Diversity Score47.9%(1,376)
Diversity Score
48
+1294%since 2000
from 3 in 2000
1990 – 2024
Section 05

Education

Bachelor's degree or higher
20.3%
−2.1 ptssince 2000
from 22.3% in 2000
US average: 27.9%
High school or higher
85.9%
−2.6 ptssince 2000
from 88.5% in 2000
US average: 84.9%
Graduate degree
4.3%
−1.8 ptssince 2000
from 6.1% in 2000
US average: 10.2%
Section 06

Commute & transportation

Average commute
10.9 min
+22%since 2000
from 9.0 min in 2000
US average: 25.2
Drive alone to work
63.6%
−2.1 ptssince 2009
from 65.7% in 2009
US average: 76.2%
Carpooled to work
19.0%
+0.1 ptssince 2009
from 18.9% in 2009
US average: 10.4%
Public transit
0.0%
Unchangedsince 2009
from 0.0% in 2009
US average: 4.7%
Worked from home
2.5%
+1.0 ptssince 2009
from 1.5% in 2009
US average: 4.1%
Walked to work
13.9%
+0.6 ptssince 2009
from 13.3% in 2009
US average: 2.8%
Biked to work
0.4%
+0.3 ptssince 2009
from 0.1% in 2009
US average: 0.5%
No vehicle available
10.8%
+5.9 ptssince 2009
from 5.0% in 2009
US average: 8.7%
Section 07

Work & employment

Self-employed
21.5%
−3.7 ptssince 2009
from 25.2% in 2009
US average: 12.9%
Management & professional
26.9%
−31.9 ptssince 2009
from 58.8% in 2009
US average: 35.2%
Section 08

People & community

Male
49.9%
+3.7 ptssince 2009
from 46.2% in 2009
Female
50.1%
−3.7 ptssince 2009
from 53.8% in 2009
Foreign born
1.5%
−0.5 ptssince 2009
from 2.0% in 2009
US average: 12.8%
Veterans
14.0%
−34.4 ptssince 2009
from 48.4% in 2009
US average: 9.9%
Drill deeper

Places similar to Cut Bank

Dover
Pop 3,009
Chattahoochee
Pop 3,011
Holden Heights
Pop 3,286
Jasper
Pop 3,444
Places similar to Cut Bank
Head to head

Compare Cut Bank to nearby cities

CUT BANK VS
Great Falls
Income$63,373+55%
Home value$257,000+269%
Population60,208+1923%
SEE FULL COMPARISON →
CUT BANK VS
Evergreen
Income$76,446+86%
Home value$340,800+389%
Population9,611+223%
SEE FULL COMPARISON →
CUT BANK VS
Kalispell
Income$63,415+55%
Home value$428,000+514%
Population31,851+970%
SEE FULL COMPARISON →
CUT BANK VS
Helena Valley West Central
Income$90,082+120%
Home value$367,200+427%
Population8,056+171%
SEE FULL COMPARISON →
Frequently asked

How many people live in Cut Bank, Montana?

Cut Bank, Montana has about 2,869 residents according to the 2010 American Community Survey.

What is the median household income in Cut Bank, Montana?

The typical household in Cut Bank, Montana earns about $40,996 a year. Half of households make more than that, and half make less.

Is Cut Bank, Montana expensive?

In Cut Bank, Montana, the median home is worth about $69,700, and the typical rent is about $577 a month.

How educated are people in Cut Bank, Montana?

About 20.3% of adults age 25 and over in Cut Bank, Montana hold a bachelor's degree or higher.

What is the poverty rate in Cut Bank, Montana?

About 17.2% of people in Cut Bank, Montana live below the federal poverty line.

Has Cut Bank, Montana grown since 1990?

Yes, Cut Bank, Montana has shrunk since 1990. The population has lost about 460 residents, a change of about -14 percent over that period.

Keep going

Explore from here

Up the hierarchy
Montana
Rankings
Highest income citiesFastest growing citiesMost educated cities
Compare
Compare Cut Bank with another place

DATA: US CENSUS BUREAU ACS 5-YEAR + DECENNIAL CENSUS · UPDATED 2024

How we source and harmonize this data →