CensusEasy
Census tract rankings · Oklahoma

Most rent-burdened census tracts in Oklahoma

Share of renter households paying more than 30% of income on rent — a federal threshold for housing-cost burden. Filtered to Oklahoma, ranked among all tracts in the state.

Flip the list · Least rent-burdened census tracts in Oklahoma
Filter by state
RankTractCountyrent burden
#1Tract 1092.05Oklahoma, OK100.0%
#2Tract 3008.03Canadian, OK96.4%
#3Tract 110.02Payne, OK92.0%
#4Tract 1082.25Oklahoma, OK86.7%
#5Tract 105.02Payne, OK86.0%
#6Tract 2Tulsa, OK82.1%
#7Tract 103Payne, OK81.3%
#8Tract 1052.01Oklahoma, OK81.2%
#9Tract 1085.15Oklahoma, OK78.9%
#10Tract 94.04Tulsa, OK78.3%
#11Tract 305.08Wagoner, OK78.0%
#12Tract 2012.02Cleveland, OK76.9%
#13Tract 2015.12Cleveland, OK76.4%
#14Tract 4002.03McClain, OK75.9%
#15Tract 1082.36Oklahoma, OK75.8%
#16Tract 13.02Garfield, OK74.1%
#17Tract 106Payne, OK73.0%
#18Tract 1083.17Oklahoma, OK72.4%
#19Tract 41.01Tulsa, OK72.2%
#20Tract 1004Oklahoma, OK71.8%
#21Tract 1002.02Oklahoma, OK71.0%
#22Tract 1080.09Oklahoma, OK70.5%
#23Tract 1087.10Oklahoma, OK70.5%
#24Tract 75.23Tulsa, OK69.9%
#25Tract 1013Oklahoma, OK69.8%
#26Tract 1081.14Oklahoma, OK69.8%
#27Tract 2012.05Cleveland, OK68.6%
#28Tract 1072.22Oklahoma, OK68.6%
#29Tract 9506Texas, OK67.9%
#30Tract 1047Oklahoma, OK67.7%
#31Tract 6003Logan, OK67.6%
#32Tract 1078.05Oklahoma, OK67.4%
#33Tract 1084.03Oklahoma, OK67.3%
#34Tract 1067.05Oklahoma, OK67.3%
#35Tract 6004.02Logan, OK67.2%
#36Tract 1067.06Oklahoma, OK67.1%
#37Tract 7Washington, OK67.0%
#38Tract 75.26Tulsa, OK66.7%
#39Tract 1073.05Oklahoma, OK66.7%
#40Tract 105.03Payne, OK66.5%
#41Tract 1063.02Oklahoma, OK66.2%
#42Tract 2011.04Cleveland, OK65.7%
#43Tract 2009Cleveland, OK65.6%
#44Tract 1041Oklahoma, OK65.6%
#45Tract 1066.10Oklahoma, OK65.5%
#46Tract 90.13Tulsa, OK65.4%
#47Tract 1074.01Oklahoma, OK65.3%
#48Tract 108Payne, OK65.3%
#49Tract 15Comanche, OK65.2%
#50Tract 1059.04Oklahoma, OK65.1%
#51Tract 3007.01Canadian, OK64.6%
#52Tract 2016.02Cleveland, OK64.4%
#53Tract 3Muskogee, OK64.2%
#54Tract 1082.29Oklahoma, OK64.2%
#55Tract 1097Oklahoma, OK63.7%
#56Tract 77.04Tulsa, OK63.2%
#57Tract 2018.02Cleveland, OK63.1%
#58Tract 9607.02Custer, OK63.0%
#59Tract 2006.02Cleveland, OK62.9%
#60Tract 17Comanche, OK62.6%
#61Tract 1082.26Oklahoma, OK62.5%
#62Tract 76.15Tulsa, OK62.5%
#63Tract 14.01Muskogee, OK62.5%
#64Tract 15Garfield, OK62.5%
#65Tract 62Tulsa, OK62.2%
#66Tract 1082.24Oklahoma, OK62.2%
#67Tract 1068.04Oklahoma, OK62.1%
#68Tract 305.02Wagoner, OK62.0%
#69Tract 75.25Tulsa, OK62.0%
#70Tract 1074.04Oklahoma, OK61.9%
#71Tract 1069.07Oklahoma, OK61.8%
#72Tract 4864Pittsburg, OK61.8%
#73Tract 69.03Tulsa, OK61.7%
#74Tract 27Tulsa, OK61.3%
#75Tract 1088.04Oklahoma, OK61.0%
#76Tract 1018Oklahoma, OK60.9%
#77Tract 1008Oklahoma, OK60.8%
#78Tract 1069.10Oklahoma, OK60.5%
#79Tract 76.52Tulsa, OK60.4%
#80Tract 3759.02Delaware, OK60.4%
#81Tract 9400.06Osage, OK60.3%
#82Tract 1085.21Oklahoma, OK60.1%
#83Tract 21Tulsa, OK60.0%
#84Tract 49Tulsa, OK60.0%
#85Tract 1072.23Oklahoma, OK59.8%
#86Tract 1069.17Oklahoma, OK59.7%
#87Tract 76.43Tulsa, OK59.5%
#88Tract 2025.02Cleveland, OK59.5%
#89Tract 73.10Tulsa, OK59.5%
#90Tract 107Payne, OK59.5%
#91Tract 501.04Rogers, OK59.4%
#92Tract 2020.08Cleveland, OK59.0%
#93Tract 2019.03Cleveland, OK58.7%
#94Tract 65.07Tulsa, OK58.6%
#95Tract 4Washington, OK58.6%
#96Tract 76.31Tulsa, OK58.6%
#97Tract 3010.14Canadian, OK58.6%
#98Tract 9637Kiowa, OK58.5%
#99Tract 2Muskogee, OK58.4%
#100Tract 113Tulsa, OK58.2%
More tract rankings