Census tract rankings · Oklahoma
Most rent-burdened census tracts in Oklahoma
Share of renter households paying more than 30% of income on rent — a federal threshold for housing-cost burden. Filtered to Oklahoma, ranked among all tracts in the state.
Flip the list · Least rent-burdened census tracts in Oklahoma →Filter by state
All USAlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming
| Rank | Tract | County | rent burden |
|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Tract 1092.05 | Oklahoma, OK | 100.0% |
| #2 | Tract 3008.03 | Canadian, OK | 96.4% |
| #3 | Tract 110.02 | Payne, OK | 92.0% |
| #4 | Tract 1082.25 | Oklahoma, OK | 86.7% |
| #5 | Tract 105.02 | Payne, OK | 86.0% |
| #6 | Tract 2 | Tulsa, OK | 82.1% |
| #7 | Tract 103 | Payne, OK | 81.3% |
| #8 | Tract 1052.01 | Oklahoma, OK | 81.2% |
| #9 | Tract 1085.15 | Oklahoma, OK | 78.9% |
| #10 | Tract 94.04 | Tulsa, OK | 78.3% |
| #11 | Tract 305.08 | Wagoner, OK | 78.0% |
| #12 | Tract 2012.02 | Cleveland, OK | 76.9% |
| #13 | Tract 2015.12 | Cleveland, OK | 76.4% |
| #14 | Tract 4002.03 | McClain, OK | 75.9% |
| #15 | Tract 1082.36 | Oklahoma, OK | 75.8% |
| #16 | Tract 13.02 | Garfield, OK | 74.1% |
| #17 | Tract 106 | Payne, OK | 73.0% |
| #18 | Tract 1083.17 | Oklahoma, OK | 72.4% |
| #19 | Tract 41.01 | Tulsa, OK | 72.2% |
| #20 | Tract 1004 | Oklahoma, OK | 71.8% |
| #21 | Tract 1002.02 | Oklahoma, OK | 71.0% |
| #22 | Tract 1080.09 | Oklahoma, OK | 70.5% |
| #23 | Tract 1087.10 | Oklahoma, OK | 70.5% |
| #24 | Tract 75.23 | Tulsa, OK | 69.9% |
| #25 | Tract 1013 | Oklahoma, OK | 69.8% |
| #26 | Tract 1081.14 | Oklahoma, OK | 69.8% |
| #27 | Tract 2012.05 | Cleveland, OK | 68.6% |
| #28 | Tract 1072.22 | Oklahoma, OK | 68.6% |
| #29 | Tract 9506 | Texas, OK | 67.9% |
| #30 | Tract 1047 | Oklahoma, OK | 67.7% |
| #31 | Tract 6003 | Logan, OK | 67.6% |
| #32 | Tract 1078.05 | Oklahoma, OK | 67.4% |
| #33 | Tract 1084.03 | Oklahoma, OK | 67.3% |
| #34 | Tract 1067.05 | Oklahoma, OK | 67.3% |
| #35 | Tract 6004.02 | Logan, OK | 67.2% |
| #36 | Tract 1067.06 | Oklahoma, OK | 67.1% |
| #37 | Tract 7 | Washington, OK | 67.0% |
| #38 | Tract 75.26 | Tulsa, OK | 66.7% |
| #39 | Tract 1073.05 | Oklahoma, OK | 66.7% |
| #40 | Tract 105.03 | Payne, OK | 66.5% |
| #41 | Tract 1063.02 | Oklahoma, OK | 66.2% |
| #42 | Tract 2011.04 | Cleveland, OK | 65.7% |
| #43 | Tract 2009 | Cleveland, OK | 65.6% |
| #44 | Tract 1041 | Oklahoma, OK | 65.6% |
| #45 | Tract 1066.10 | Oklahoma, OK | 65.5% |
| #46 | Tract 90.13 | Tulsa, OK | 65.4% |
| #47 | Tract 1074.01 | Oklahoma, OK | 65.3% |
| #48 | Tract 108 | Payne, OK | 65.3% |
| #49 | Tract 15 | Comanche, OK | 65.2% |
| #50 | Tract 1059.04 | Oklahoma, OK | 65.1% |
| #51 | Tract 3007.01 | Canadian, OK | 64.6% |
| #52 | Tract 2016.02 | Cleveland, OK | 64.4% |
| #53 | Tract 3 | Muskogee, OK | 64.2% |
| #54 | Tract 1082.29 | Oklahoma, OK | 64.2% |
| #55 | Tract 1097 | Oklahoma, OK | 63.7% |
| #56 | Tract 77.04 | Tulsa, OK | 63.2% |
| #57 | Tract 2018.02 | Cleveland, OK | 63.1% |
| #58 | Tract 9607.02 | Custer, OK | 63.0% |
| #59 | Tract 2006.02 | Cleveland, OK | 62.9% |
| #60 | Tract 17 | Comanche, OK | 62.6% |
| #61 | Tract 1082.26 | Oklahoma, OK | 62.5% |
| #62 | Tract 76.15 | Tulsa, OK | 62.5% |
| #63 | Tract 14.01 | Muskogee, OK | 62.5% |
| #64 | Tract 15 | Garfield, OK | 62.5% |
| #65 | Tract 62 | Tulsa, OK | 62.2% |
| #66 | Tract 1082.24 | Oklahoma, OK | 62.2% |
| #67 | Tract 1068.04 | Oklahoma, OK | 62.1% |
| #68 | Tract 305.02 | Wagoner, OK | 62.0% |
| #69 | Tract 75.25 | Tulsa, OK | 62.0% |
| #70 | Tract 1074.04 | Oklahoma, OK | 61.9% |
| #71 | Tract 1069.07 | Oklahoma, OK | 61.8% |
| #72 | Tract 4864 | Pittsburg, OK | 61.8% |
| #73 | Tract 69.03 | Tulsa, OK | 61.7% |
| #74 | Tract 27 | Tulsa, OK | 61.3% |
| #75 | Tract 1088.04 | Oklahoma, OK | 61.0% |
| #76 | Tract 1018 | Oklahoma, OK | 60.9% |
| #77 | Tract 1008 | Oklahoma, OK | 60.8% |
| #78 | Tract 1069.10 | Oklahoma, OK | 60.5% |
| #79 | Tract 76.52 | Tulsa, OK | 60.4% |
| #80 | Tract 3759.02 | Delaware, OK | 60.4% |
| #81 | Tract 9400.06 | Osage, OK | 60.3% |
| #82 | Tract 1085.21 | Oklahoma, OK | 60.1% |
| #83 | Tract 21 | Tulsa, OK | 60.0% |
| #84 | Tract 49 | Tulsa, OK | 60.0% |
| #85 | Tract 1072.23 | Oklahoma, OK | 59.8% |
| #86 | Tract 1069.17 | Oklahoma, OK | 59.7% |
| #87 | Tract 76.43 | Tulsa, OK | 59.5% |
| #88 | Tract 2025.02 | Cleveland, OK | 59.5% |
| #89 | Tract 73.10 | Tulsa, OK | 59.5% |
| #90 | Tract 107 | Payne, OK | 59.5% |
| #91 | Tract 501.04 | Rogers, OK | 59.4% |
| #92 | Tract 2020.08 | Cleveland, OK | 59.0% |
| #93 | Tract 2019.03 | Cleveland, OK | 58.7% |
| #94 | Tract 65.07 | Tulsa, OK | 58.6% |
| #95 | Tract 4 | Washington, OK | 58.6% |
| #96 | Tract 76.31 | Tulsa, OK | 58.6% |
| #97 | Tract 3010.14 | Canadian, OK | 58.6% |
| #98 | Tract 9637 | Kiowa, OK | 58.5% |
| #99 | Tract 2 | Muskogee, OK | 58.4% |
| #100 | Tract 113 | Tulsa, OK | 58.2% |
More tract rankings
Densest census tracts · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Least-dense inhabited census tracts · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Most populous census tracts · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Highest-income census tracts · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Lowest-income census tracts · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Highest per-capita income census tracts · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Highest median home values · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Lowest median home values · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Highest median rent · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Lowest median rent · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Most-educated census tracts · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Least-educated census tracts · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →