Census tract rankings · Oklahoma
Most rent-burdened census tracts in Oklahoma
Share of renter households paying more than 30% of income on rent — a federal threshold for housing-cost burden. Filtered to Oklahoma, ranked among all tracts in the state.
Flip the list · Least rent-burdened census tracts in Oklahoma →Filter by state
All USAlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming
| Rank | Tract | County | rent burden |
|---|---|---|---|
| #101 | Tract 1049 | Oklahoma, OK | 58.0% |
| #102 | Tract 90.15 | Tulsa, OK | 58.0% |
| #103 | Tract 1066.08 | Oklahoma, OK | 58.0% |
| #104 | Tract 9662 | Beckham, OK | 57.8% |
| #105 | Tract 102.02 | Payne, OK | 57.8% |
| #106 | Tract 8 | Comanche, OK | 57.8% |
| #107 | Tract 1055 | Oklahoma, OK | 57.2% |
| #108 | Tract 77.06 | Tulsa, OK | 57.1% |
| #109 | Tract 2 | Stephens, OK | 57.0% |
| #110 | Tract 1086.03 | Oklahoma, OK | 57.0% |
| #111 | Tract 3008.02 | Canadian, OK | 57.0% |
| #112 | Tract 1067.10 | Oklahoma, OK | 57.0% |
| #113 | Tract 1074.06 | Oklahoma, OK | 56.9% |
| #114 | Tract 9509.01 | Texas, OK | 56.7% |
| #115 | Tract 1 | Okmulgee, OK | 56.6% |
| #116 | Tract 1087.06 | Oklahoma, OK | 56.2% |
| #117 | Tract 1084.02 | Oklahoma, OK | 56.2% |
| #118 | Tract 3005 | Canadian, OK | 56.2% |
| #119 | Tract 65.06 | Tulsa, OK | 56.1% |
| #120 | Tract 1072.14 | Oklahoma, OK | 56.0% |
| #121 | Tract 76.48 | Tulsa, OK | 56.0% |
| #122 | Tract 2015.11 | Cleveland, OK | 55.9% |
| #123 | Tract 75.36 | Tulsa, OK | 55.9% |
| #124 | Tract 85.01 | Tulsa, OK | 55.6% |
| #125 | Tract 1082.32 | Oklahoma, OK | 55.6% |
| #126 | Tract 7961.01 | Bryan, OK | 55.5% |
| #127 | Tract 9613 | Lincoln, OK | 55.5% |
| #128 | Tract 1078.01 | Oklahoma, OK | 55.4% |
| #129 | Tract 7803.01 | McIntosh, OK | 55.3% |
| #130 | Tract 3011 | Canadian, OK | 55.1% |
| #131 | Tract 1072.21 | Oklahoma, OK | 55.1% |
| #132 | Tract 109.01 | Payne, OK | 55.1% |
| #133 | Tract 1059.06 | Oklahoma, OK | 55.1% |
| #134 | Tract 2010 | Cleveland, OK | 55.0% |
| #135 | Tract 76.17 | Tulsa, OK | 55.0% |
| #136 | Tract 91.01 | Tulsa, OK | 54.8% |
| #137 | Tract 102.01 | Payne, OK | 54.7% |
| #138 | Tract 2021.05 | Cleveland, OK | 54.7% |
| #139 | Tract 504.06 | Rogers, OK | 54.5% |
| #140 | Tract 73.13 | Tulsa, OK | 54.5% |
| #141 | Tract 76.33 | Tulsa, OK | 54.5% |
| #142 | Tract 90.12 | Tulsa, OK | 54.5% |
| #143 | Tract 1066.11 | Oklahoma, OK | 54.3% |
| #144 | Tract 69.07 | Tulsa, OK | 54.2% |
| #145 | Tract 1086.04 | Oklahoma, OK | 54.2% |
| #146 | Tract 75.20 | Tulsa, OK | 54.2% |
| #147 | Tract 1073.02 | Oklahoma, OK | 54.1% |
| #148 | Tract 4 | Muskogee, OK | 54.1% |
| #149 | Tract 2025.01 | Cleveland, OK | 54.0% |
| #150 | Tract 5004 | Pottawatomie, OK | 54.0% |
| #151 | Tract 3009.01 | Canadian, OK | 54.0% |
| #152 | Tract 8926.01 | Carter, OK | 53.9% |
| #153 | Tract 40 | Tulsa, OK | 53.8% |
| #154 | Tract 58.05 | Tulsa, OK | 53.8% |
| #155 | Tract 3010.11 | Canadian, OK | 53.7% |
| #156 | Tract 1080.11 | Oklahoma, OK | 53.7% |
| #157 | Tract 8.02 | Muskogee, OK | 53.6% |
| #158 | Tract 1073.06 | Oklahoma, OK | 53.6% |
| #159 | Tract 1072.25 | Oklahoma, OK | 53.5% |
| #160 | Tract 2022.05 | Cleveland, OK | 53.5% |
| #161 | Tract 2016.04 | Cleveland, OK | 53.5% |
| #162 | Tract 9606 | Custer, OK | 53.5% |
| #163 | Tract 1072.06 | Oklahoma, OK | 53.2% |
| #164 | Tract 3003 | Canadian, OK | 53.2% |
| #165 | Tract 83 | Tulsa, OK | 53.1% |
| #166 | Tract 6.01 | Washington, OK | 53.0% |
| #167 | Tract 1005 | Oklahoma, OK | 52.9% |
| #168 | Tract 16.03 | Garfield, OK | 52.9% |
| #169 | Tract 43.02 | Tulsa, OK | 52.9% |
| #170 | Tract 1082.04 | Oklahoma, OK | 52.9% |
| #171 | Tract 704 | Tillman, OK | 52.8% |
| #172 | Tract 1095 | Oklahoma, OK | 52.8% |
| #173 | Tract 4 | Tulsa, OK | 52.7% |
| #174 | Tract 3010.10 | Canadian, OK | 52.6% |
| #175 | Tract 74.12 | Tulsa, OK | 52.6% |
| #176 | Tract 2 | Garfield, OK | 52.6% |
| #177 | Tract 1 | Comanche, OK | 52.6% |
| #178 | Tract 68.03 | Tulsa, OK | 52.4% |
| #179 | Tract 19.01 | Comanche, OK | 52.4% |
| #180 | Tract 2004 | Cleveland, OK | 52.2% |
| #181 | Tract 3014.09 | Canadian, OK | 52.2% |
| #182 | Tract 2021.07 | Cleveland, OK | 52.2% |
| #183 | Tract 1022 | Oklahoma, OK | 52.1% |
| #184 | Tract 9.02 | Muskogee, OK | 52.1% |
| #185 | Tract 7802 | McIntosh, OK | 52.1% |
| #186 | Tract 5 | Tulsa, OK | 52.1% |
| #187 | Tract 1068.03 | Oklahoma, OK | 52.1% |
| #188 | Tract 22.01 | Comanche, OK | 52.1% |
| #189 | Tract 57 | Tulsa, OK | 52.0% |
| #190 | Tract 23.01 | Tulsa, OK | 51.9% |
| #191 | Tract 1069.14 | Oklahoma, OK | 51.9% |
| #192 | Tract 1082.30 | Oklahoma, OK | 51.9% |
| #193 | Tract 1085.31 | Oklahoma, OK | 51.8% |
| #194 | Tract 2015.09 | Cleveland, OK | 51.8% |
| #195 | Tract 1087.08 | Oklahoma, OK | 51.7% |
| #196 | Tract 1085.26 | Oklahoma, OK | 51.7% |
| #197 | Tract 406.02 | Le Flore, OK | 51.6% |
| #198 | Tract 1066.06 | Oklahoma, OK | 51.5% |
| #199 | Tract 75.28 | Tulsa, OK | 51.4% |
| #200 | Tract 9508 | Custer, OK | 51.4% |
More tract rankings
Densest census tracts · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Least-dense inhabited census tracts · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Most populous census tracts · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Highest-income census tracts · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Lowest-income census tracts · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Highest per-capita income census tracts · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Highest median home values · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Lowest median home values · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Highest median rent · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Lowest median rent · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Most-educated census tracts · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Least-educated census tracts · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →