CensusEasy
CITY · 2010 ACS

King Arthur Park

Montana · 738 residents · 0.463 sq mi
Time machine
COMPARE TO
Part of the Bozeman metro area
Compare
The short version

King Arthur Park has lower-than-average household income, with a median household income of $41,341. Population has grown 29% since 2011. Median home value is $25,800. At a median age of 31.4, residents skew younger than the country as a whole. Poverty is rare here, at 2.7% of residents.

At a glance
Lower income
below the US median
US median: $52,703
Younger
median age 31.4
US median: 37.2
Less educated
22% hold a bachelor's degree
US average: 28%
Stable housing
home values roughly flat, inflation adjusted
US median home: $225,659
Section 01

Population & growth

Total population
738
+29%vs 2011
vs 574 in 2011
2010 – 2024
Population density
1,594 / sq mi
+29%vs 2011
vs 1,240 / sq mi in 2011
US average: 261
Median age
31.4
−41%vs 2011
vs 53.1 in 2011
US average: 37.2
Population, 2010 – 2024
3979281K2K3K201020202024King Arthur Park
20242K
201020202024
Section 02

Income & economy

Median household income
$41,341
+4%inflation adjusted, since 2011
vs $40,990 in 2011
US average: $52,703
2010 – 2024
Per capita income
$26,290
−11%vs 2011
vs $29,633 in 2011
US average: $27,286
Households earning $100K+
18.7%
−4.4 ptsvs 2011
vs 23.1% in 2011
US average: 33.3%
Poverty rate
2.7%
+0.4 ptsvs 2011
vs 2.3% in 2011
US average: 13.8%
Income inequality (Gini)
0.384
+31%vs 2011
vs 0.293 in 2011
US average: 0.461
Workforce by industry, 2010
Retail trade17.6%
US avg: 10.9%
Wholesale trade15%
US avg: 7.2%
Other services14.5%
US avg: 7%
Information9.8%
US avg: 11.5%
Public administration6.6%
US avg: 4.9%
Agriculture, forestry, fishing0%
US avg: 1.9%
Construction0%
US avg: 1.4%
Manufacturing0%
US avg: 0.5%
Transportation & warehousing0%
US avg: 3.1%
Finance & insurance0%
US avg: 5.1%
Professional, scientific, technical0%
US avg: 4.2%
Education & health services0%
US avg: 0.9%
Arts, entertainment, food0%
US avg: 2.4%
BARS: THIS PLACE · TICKS: US AVERAGE
Section 03

Housing

Median home value
$25,800
−2%inflation adjusted, since 2011
vs $27,100 in 2011
US average: $225,659
2010 – 2023
Median gross rent
$823
−19%inflation adjusted, since 2011
vs $1,042 in 2011
US average: $853
Owner-occupied
41.8%
−42.6 ptsvs 2011
vs 84.4% in 2011
22.2% rent
Vacancy rate
0.0%
Unchangedvs 2011
vs 0.0% in 2011
US average: 12.1%
Owner cost-burdened
42.2%
+9.7 ptsvs 2011
vs 32.5% in 2011
US average: 30.9%
Renter cost-burdened
0.0%
Unchangedvs 2011
vs 0.0% in 2011
US average: 46.8%
Afford Score
0.6
−6%vs 2011
vs 0.7 in 2011
2010 – 2023
RELATED:See current rent listings in King Arthur Park on RentDataNow
Section 04

Race & ethnicity

2011
White, non-Hispanic94.1%(540)
Black0%(0)
Hispanic / Latino2.8%(16)
Asian0%(0)
Other3.1%(18)
Diversity Score14.1%(81)
2010
White, non-Hispanic90.7%(669)
Black0.7%(5)
Hispanic / Latino2.6%(19)
Asian0.8%(6)
Other1.4%(10)
Diversity Score13.7%(101)
Diversity Score
14
−3%vs 2011
vs 14 in 2011
2010 – 2024
Section 05

Education

Bachelor's degree or higher
22.0%
−23.7 ptsvs 2011
vs 45.7% in 2011
US average: 27.9%
High school or higher
70.7%
−16.0 ptsvs 2011
vs 86.7% in 2011
US average: 84.9%
Graduate degree
7.3%
+0.6 ptsvs 2011
vs 6.7% in 2011
US average: 10.2%
Section 06

Commute & transportation

Average commute
15.7 min
+22%vs 2011
vs 12.8 min in 2011
US average: 25.2
Drive alone to work
82.7%
−14.0 ptsvs 2011
vs 96.7% in 2011
US average: 76.2%
Carpooled to work
13.9%
+10.5 ptsvs 2011
vs 3.3% in 2011
US average: 10.4%
Public transit
0.0%
Unchangedvs 2011
vs 0.0% in 2011
US average: 4.7%
Worked from home
0.0%
Unchangedvs 2011
vs 0.0% in 2011
US average: 4.1%
Walked to work
0.0%
Unchangedvs 2011
vs 0.0% in 2011
US average: 2.8%
Biked to work
0.0%
Unchangedvs 2011
vs 0.0% in 2011
US average: 0.5%
No vehicle available
0.0%
Unchangedvs 2011
vs 0.0% in 2011
US average: 8.7%
Section 07

Work & employment

Self-employed
12.1%
−3.0 ptsvs 2011
vs 15.1% in 2011
US average: 12.9%
Management & professional
22.3%
−32.7 ptsvs 2011
vs 55.0% in 2011
US average: 35.2%
Section 08

People & community

Male
29.7%
−11.1 ptsvs 2011
vs 40.8% in 2011
Female
70.3%
+11.1 ptsvs 2011
vs 59.2% in 2011
Foreign born
0.0%
Unchangedvs 2011
vs 0.0% in 2011
US average: 12.8%
Veterans
10.5%
−6.1 ptsvs 2011
vs 16.5% in 2011
US average: 9.9%
Drill deeper

Places similar to King Arthur Park

El Portal
Pop 1,943
Lincoln
Pop 1,873
Redington Shores
Pop 2,118
Lake Mack-Forest Hills
Pop 2,200
Places similar to King Arthur Park
Head to head

Compare King Arthur Park to nearby cities

KING ARTHUR PARK VS
Bozeman
Income$85,747+107%
Home value$687,900+2566%
Population58,814+2853%
SEE FULL COMPARISON →
KING ARTHUR PARK VS
Belgrade
Income$97,328+135%
Home value$535,200+1974%
Population13,107+558%
SEE FULL COMPARISON →
KING ARTHUR PARK VS
Livingston
Income$65,861+59%
Home value$392,400+1421%
Population9,290+366%
SEE FULL COMPARISON →
KING ARTHUR PARK VS
Butte-Silver Bow
Income$61,857+50%
Home value$257,800+899%
Population35,469+1681%
SEE FULL COMPARISON →
Frequently asked

How many people live in King Arthur Park, Montana?

King Arthur Park, Montana has about 738 residents according to the 2010 American Community Survey.

What is the median household income in King Arthur Park, Montana?

The typical household in King Arthur Park, Montana earns about $41,341 a year. Half of households make more than that, and half make less.

Is King Arthur Park, Montana expensive?

In King Arthur Park, Montana, the median home is worth about $25,800, and the typical rent is about $823 a month.

How educated are people in King Arthur Park, Montana?

About 22.0% of adults age 25 and over in King Arthur Park, Montana hold a bachelor's degree or higher.

What is the poverty rate in King Arthur Park, Montana?

About 2.7% of people in King Arthur Park, Montana live below the federal poverty line.

Keep going

Explore from here

Up the hierarchy
Montana
Rankings
Highest income citiesFastest growing citiesMost educated cities
Compare
Compare King Arthur Park with another place

DATA: US CENSUS BUREAU ACS 5-YEAR + DECENNIAL CENSUS · UPDATED 2024

How we source and harmonize this data →