Census tract rankings · Oklahoma
Least-connected census tracts in Oklahoma
Smallest share of households with a broadband internet subscription — the sharp end of the digital divide. A population floor keeps tiny tracts off the list. Filtered to Oklahoma, ranked among all tracts in the state.
Flip the list · Best-connected census tracts in Oklahoma →Filter by state
All USAlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming
| Rank | Tract | County | low broadband |
|---|---|---|---|
| #201 | Tract 5 | Okmulgee, OK | 80.7% |
| #202 | Tract 4868 | Pittsburg, OK | 80.7% |
| #203 | Tract 7907.02 | Murray, OK | 80.7% |
| #204 | Tract 2792 | Haskell, OK | 80.8% |
| #205 | Tract 90.11 | Tulsa, OK | 80.8% |
| #206 | Tract 1068.02 | Oklahoma, OK | 80.8% |
| #207 | Tract 704 | Tillman, OK | 80.8% |
| #208 | Tract 1052.02 | Oklahoma, OK | 80.8% |
| #209 | Tract 71.01 | Tulsa, OK | 80.9% |
| #210 | Tract 9783.01 | Cherokee, OK | 80.9% |
| #211 | Tract 21.02 | Comanche, OK | 81.0% |
| #212 | Tract 809 | Okfuskee, OK | 81.0% |
| #213 | Tract 29 | Tulsa, OK | 81.0% |
| #214 | Tract 9400.04 | Osage, OK | 81.0% |
| #215 | Tract 14 | Tulsa, OK | 81.1% |
| #216 | Tract 5748 | Ottawa, OK | 81.1% |
| #217 | Tract 2794 | Haskell, OK | 81.1% |
| #218 | Tract 10 | Muskogee, OK | 81.1% |
| #219 | Tract 5010.05 | Pottawatomie, OK | 81.2% |
| #220 | Tract 872 | Latimer, OK | 81.2% |
| #221 | Tract 5749 | Ottawa, OK | 81.2% |
| #222 | Tract 307.98 | Wagoner, OK | 81.2% |
| #223 | Tract 2002 | Cleveland, OK | 81.2% |
| #224 | Tract 304.01 | Sequoyah, OK | 81.3% |
| #225 | Tract 943 | Love, OK | 81.3% |
| #226 | Tract 5 | Tulsa, OK | 81.3% |
| #227 | Tract 76.50 | Tulsa, OK | 81.4% |
| #228 | Tract 1077.04 | Oklahoma, OK | 81.4% |
| #229 | Tract 948.06 | Marshall, OK | 81.4% |
| #230 | Tract 9556 | Alfalfa, OK | 81.4% |
| #231 | Tract 1010 | Oklahoma, OK | 81.5% |
| #232 | Tract 70 | Tulsa, OK | 81.5% |
| #233 | Tract 5838 | Seminole, OK | 81.5% |
| #234 | Tract 5837 | Seminole, OK | 81.5% |
| #235 | Tract 13.02 | Muskogee, OK | 81.6% |
| #236 | Tract 502.01 | Rogers, OK | 81.6% |
| #237 | Tract 985.02 | McCurtain, OK | 81.6% |
| #238 | Tract 301.05 | Sequoyah, OK | 81.7% |
| #239 | Tract 7957 | Bryan, OK | 81.7% |
| #240 | Tract 5742 | Ottawa, OK | 81.7% |
| #241 | Tract 871 | Latimer, OK | 81.7% |
| #242 | Tract 5835 | Seminole, OK | 81.7% |
| #243 | Tract 1082.07 | Oklahoma, OK | 81.7% |
| #244 | Tract 1073.05 | Oklahoma, OK | 81.7% |
| #245 | Tract 9612 | Lincoln, OK | 81.8% |
| #246 | Tract 4862 | Pittsburg, OK | 81.8% |
| #247 | Tract 85.01 | Tulsa, OK | 81.8% |
| #248 | Tract 9592 | Dewey, OK | 81.8% |
| #249 | Tract 892 | Pontotoc, OK | 81.8% |
| #250 | Tract 9.01 | Stephens, OK | 81.9% |
| #251 | Tract 1069.17 | Oklahoma, OK | 81.9% |
| #252 | Tract 4856.01 | Pittsburg, OK | 81.9% |
| #253 | Tract 8.02 | Muskogee, OK | 82.0% |
| #254 | Tract 3735 | Craig, OK | 82.0% |
| #255 | Tract 941 | Love, OK | 82.1% |
| #256 | Tract 4866 | Pittsburg, OK | 82.1% |
| #257 | Tract 9543 | Woods, OK | 82.1% |
| #258 | Tract 16 | Comanche, OK | 82.1% |
| #259 | Tract 947 | Marshall, OK | 82.2% |
| #260 | Tract 302.02 | Sequoyah, OK | 82.2% |
| #261 | Tract 401 | Mayes, OK | 82.2% |
| #262 | Tract 9400.13 | Osage, OK | 82.2% |
| #263 | Tract 1046 | Oklahoma, OK | 82.2% |
| #264 | Tract 3 | Muskogee, OK | 82.3% |
| #265 | Tract 2012.04 | Cleveland, OK | 82.3% |
| #266 | Tract 82 | Tulsa, OK | 82.3% |
| #267 | Tract 211.01 | Creek, OK | 82.4% |
| #268 | Tract 1095 | Oklahoma, OK | 82.5% |
| #269 | Tract 9586 | Blaine, OK | 82.5% |
| #270 | Tract 73.06 | Tulsa, OK | 82.6% |
| #271 | Tract 8927 | Carter, OK | 82.6% |
| #272 | Tract 402.99 | Le Flore, OK | 82.6% |
| #273 | Tract 9651 | Washita, OK | 82.6% |
| #274 | Tract 76.44 | Tulsa, OK | 82.6% |
| #275 | Tract 1043 | Oklahoma, OK | 82.6% |
| #276 | Tract 5011.04 | Pottawatomie, OK | 82.7% |
| #277 | Tract 73.14 | Tulsa, OK | 82.7% |
| #278 | Tract 89 | Tulsa, OK | 82.7% |
| #279 | Tract 8931 | Carter, OK | 82.7% |
| #280 | Tract 68.04 | Tulsa, OK | 82.7% |
| #281 | Tract 302.01 | Sequoyah, OK | 82.7% |
| #282 | Tract 1100 | Oklahoma, OK | 82.7% |
| #283 | Tract 105.02 | Payne, OK | 82.7% |
| #284 | Tract 1088.03 | Oklahoma, OK | 82.7% |
| #285 | Tract 1082.08 | Oklahoma, OK | 82.8% |
| #286 | Tract 9671 | Choctaw, OK | 82.8% |
| #287 | Tract 13.01 | Muskogee, OK | 82.8% |
| #288 | Tract 9650 | Washita, OK | 82.8% |
| #289 | Tract 5011.01 | Pottawatomie, OK | 82.9% |
| #290 | Tract 8 | Stephens, OK | 82.9% |
| #291 | Tract 12 | Garfield, OK | 82.9% |
| #292 | Tract 9.01 | Okmulgee, OK | 82.9% |
| #293 | Tract 810 | Okfuskee, OK | 82.9% |
| #294 | Tract 73.04 | Tulsa, OK | 83.0% |
| #295 | Tract 6.02 | Garfield, OK | 83.0% |
| #296 | Tract 108 | Payne, OK | 83.0% |
| #297 | Tract 1621.01 | Caddo, OK | 83.1% |
| #298 | Tract 13.02 | Kay, OK | 83.2% |
| #299 | Tract 6602.01 | Johnston, OK | 83.2% |
| #300 | Tract 9589 | Blaine, OK | 83.2% |
More tract rankings
Densest census tracts · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Least-dense inhabited census tracts · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Most populous census tracts · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Highest-income census tracts · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Lowest-income census tracts · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Highest per-capita income census tracts · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Highest median home values · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Lowest median home values · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Highest median rent · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Lowest median rent · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Most-educated census tracts · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →
Least-educated census tracts · Oklahoma
SEE LIST →