RANKING · 2010 CENSUS · 97 SHOWN OF 97

Most owner cost-burdened, Utah cities · 2010

Utah cities ranked by the share of owner households spending 30% or more of income on housing costs (2010 ACS). This list covers the 97 cities in Utah that qualify, ranked against each other statewide. The median across all 97 is 27.5%.

UtahAll statesPop > 5KAll rankings

SAME RANKING BYCounties States Metros ZIP codes

YEAR2010 2024

RANKPLACESTATEPOPOWNER COST-BURDENED HOUSEHOLDSVS –

01Saratoga Springs, UTUT61,39745.7%–

02Eagle Mountain, UTUT66,55744.9%–

03Vineyard, UTUT16,09243.9%–

04Snyderville, UTUT5,94843.6%–

05Herriman, UTUT63,28243.2%–

06Park City, UTUT8,58740.1%–

07Heber, UTUT19,65139.0%–

08Enoch, UTUT8,84739.0%–

09Mapleton, UTUT16,27538.1%–

10Nibley, UTUT8,97537.0%–

11Washington, UTUT37,10736.8%–

12Santa Clara, UTUT8,72236.5%–

13Ivins, UTUT11,54636.1%–

14Kearns metro, UTUT35,40434.8%–

15Magna metro, UTUT35,40134.4%–

16Spanish Fork, UTUT48,83734.2%–

17Lehi, UTUT95,31334.1%–

18Draper, UTUT50,65233.9%–

19Hooper, UTUT9,74133.7%–

20Springville, UTUT35,67032.7%–

21Hurricane, UTUT25,74532.6%–

22Cedar City, UTUT41,87132.4%–

23South Jordan, UTUT87,61432.3%–

24Riverton, UTUT47,39532.3%–

25West Jordan, UTUT116,81232.1%–

26Bluffdale, UTUT19,50631.8%–

27Highland, UTUT21,57131.5%–

28Hyrum, UTUT11,13231.3%–

29South Salt Lake, UTUT26,93430.9%–

30Clearfield, UTUT35,14430.9%–

31Farmington, UTUT26,26630.8%–

32St. George, UTUT108,71330.5%–

33North Salt Lake, UTUT23,58830.4%–

34Pleasant Grove, UTUT37,77330.3%–

35West Valley City, UTUT137,49130.2%–

36Provo, UTUT114,52730.1%–

37Syracuse, UTUT39,90930.0%–

38West Point, UTUT13,05830.0%–

39Clinton, UTUT23,79729.8%–

40Santaquin, UTUT18,98929.7%–

41West Haven, UTUT25,62729.4%–

42Payson, UTUT24,63029.3%–

43Summit Park, UTUT8,53729.1%–

44Salt Lake City, UTUT218,42828.8%–

45Harrisville, UTUT7,15428.4%–

46Logan, UTUT55,57628.0%–

47Midvale, UTUT36,09928.0%–

48Holladay, UTUT31,16227.6%–

49Lindon, UTUT12,01527.5%–

50Layton, UTUT85,30827.4%–

51Alpine, UTUT10,44427.0%–

52Sandy, UTUT92,38626.9%–

53Nephi, UTUT7,48826.9%–

54Orem, UTUT95,21426.7%–

55Taylorsville, UTUT57,48426.3%–

56Woods Cross, UTUT11,42926.1%–

57Ogden, UTUT89,51026.0%–

58Midway, UTUT6,01125.9%–

59Roosevelt, UTUT7,03225.8%–

60Ephraim, UTUT6,39325.5%–

61Cedar Hills, UTUT9,75525.4%–

62Roy, UTUT38,79425.3%–

63White City metro, UTUT5,14625.1%–

64South Ogden, UTUT17,71025.1%–

65Millcreek, UTUT63,92624.9%–

66North Logan, UTUT11,60824.6%–

67Murray, UTUT53,29724.5%–

68Farr West, UTUT8,16324.4%–

69Providence, UTUT9,53924.3%–

70Plain City, UTUT9,25623.9%–

71Kaysville, UTUT33,30723.7%–

72Perry, UTUT6,22623.6%–

73Washington Terrace, UTUT9,07523.5%–

74Tooele, UTUT42,27023.5%–

75Grantsville, UTUT16,47223.3%–

76South Weber, UTUT8,21823.2%–

77Richfield, UTUT8,47823.1%–

78West Bountiful, UTUT5,93122.9%–

79Moab, UTUT5,20622.7%–

80Sunset, UTUT5,54922.5%–

81Cottonwood Heights, UTUT32,26522.2%–

82Smithfield, UTUT15,15322.1%–

83Hyde Park, UTUT5,78622.0%–

84American Fork, UTUT41,02021.9%–

85Bountiful, UTUT44,98821.4%–

86Riverdale, UTUT9,20620.8%–

87Vernal, UTUT10,67120.6%–

88Salem, UTUT12,23420.3%–

89North Ogden, UTUT21,68919.9%–

90Pleasant View, UTUT11,42319.6%–

91Tremonton, UTUT12,93419.3%–

92Brigham City, UTUT20,63319.3%–

93Kanab, UTUT5,33218.7%–

94Fruit Heights, UTUT5,95217.7%–

95Centerville, UTUT16,48017.1%–

96Price, UTUT8,36816.1%–

97Stansbury Park, UTUT11,24215.5%–

SHOWING 1–97 OF 97

Download CSV (full list, 97 rows)

UPDATED 2026-09-11 · DATA: US CENSUS BUREAU DECENNIAL CENSUS