Population growth rate, explained
Percent change in population from the prior decennial census.
What it measures
Population growth rate is the percentage change in a place's resident population over a defined period. CensusEasy reports the cumulative percentage change between two ACS or decennial vintages, for example, the 2010-to-2024 change for fastest-growing-cities rankings. A positive growth rate means the population grew; a negative rate means it shrank. The growth rate combines three demographic components: natural change (births minus deaths) and net migration (people moving in minus people moving out). For most US places, net migration dwarfs natural change as the driver of growth.
The growth rate is a flow measure, not a level, a county with 50% growth from a base of 10,000 added only 5,000 people, while one with 5% growth from a base of 1,000,000 added 50,000. For most local decisions, the absolute change in population matters as much as the percentage change.
Why it matters
Growth rate predicts the next decade of demand for housing, schools, water, transportation, and consumer goods. A metro growing above 2% per year is doubling its population every 35 years and accumulating an infrastructure backlog that needs continuous investment. A metro shrinking by 1% per year is hollowing out, services, retail, and home values follow the population down. For real-estate investors, the 10-year growth rate is one of the strongest single predictors of nominal home-price appreciation. For city governments, growth rate divides the country into expanding tax bases (Sunbelt metros, southeast Florida) and contracting ones (the legacy industrial Midwest, parts of the rural South).
Top US places by population growth
Top 25 per geography type from the latest ACS vintage. See the full ranking links for the complete eligible universe.
Top states (2020)
SEE ALL 51 →Top metro areas (2020)
SEE ALL 918 →Top counties (2020)
SEE ALL 3,131 →Top cities (2020)
SEE ALL 6,642 →How the Census measures it
Growth rates on this site are computed from two snapshots of the ACS or decennial population. The formula is (new - old) / old × 100. Comparing decennial counts (2010 to 2020) gives the cleanest read because both are full enumerations; comparing two ACS estimates (2015-2019 to 2020-2024) introduces some noise because both endpoints are estimates with their own confidence intervals. The Census Bureau also publishes annual Population Estimates (PEP) that allow shorter-window growth-rate calculations, but CensusEasy uses ACS for consistency with the rest of the metric series.
How to read the numbers
Since 2010, the fastest-growing US metros have been concentrated in the South and Mountain West: Austin, Raleigh, Phoenix, Boise, the Florida Gulf coast metros, and several Texas and Tennessee mid-sized cities. The fastest-growing individual cities tend to be exurbs of those metros, Frisco, Texas; Buckeye, Arizona; Lehi, Utah, where greenfield housing supply absorbed migration that the central cities couldn't accommodate. The fastest-shrinking places cluster in Appalachia, the rural Great Plains, and a handful of legacy industrial cities in Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, and Illinois. Within a metro, the city-versus-suburb growth split is often a reliable indicator of local housing-policy posture.
Caveats and limitations
Small-place percentage changes are volatile, a 3,000-person town adding 600 residents posts a 20% growth rate that doesn't survive into the next vintage. Boundary changes (annexations, incorporations, consolidations) can produce phantom growth or decline that has nothing to do with actual migration; the Census Bureau publishes population for the geography as it existed on each survey date, not the constant boundary. When comparing growth rates across very different time windows (5-year ACS deltas vs 10-year decennial deltas), annualize before comparing, otherwise the longer window looks artificially impressive.