CensusEasy
CITY

Munds Park

Arizona · 608 residents · 22.247 sq mi
Time machine
COMPARE TO
Part of the Flagstaff metro area
Compare
The short version

Population has fallen 51% since 2000, a loss of 642 residents. Median home value has more than tripled since 2000, reaching $779,900. With a median age of 71.6, the population is older than the US median of 38.9. The poverty rate of 52.3% is well above the national figure. Despite a median home value of $779,900, the poverty rate sits 320% above the US average — a pattern often seen in resort and college towns.

At a glance
Older
median age 71.6
US median: 38.9
Average education
37% hold a bachelor's degree
US average: 36%
Less affordable
home values up 232%, inflation adjusted
US median home: $376,019
Section 01

Population & growth

Total population
608
−51%since 2000
from 1,250 in 2000
2000 – 2024
Population density
27 / sq mi
−51%since 2000
from 56 / sq mi in 2000
US average: 281
Median age
71.6
+42%since 2000
from 50.4 in 2000
US average: 38.9
Population, 2000 – 2024
5447369291K1K2000201020202024Munds Park
2024608
2000201020202024
Section 02

Income & economy

Per capita income
$37,292
+64%since 2000
from $22,769 in 2000
US average: $44,673
Households earning $100K+
32.7%
+12.6 ptssince 2009
from 20.1% in 2009
US average: 53.3%
Poverty rate
52.3%
+44.5 ptssince 2000
from 7.9% in 2000
US average: 12.5%
Income inequality (Gini)
0.588
+49%since 2010
from 0.396 in 2010
US average: 0.476
Workforce by industry, 2024
Information42.4%
US avg: 10.8%
Agriculture, forestry, fishing0%
US avg: 1.6%
Construction0%
US avg: 1.2%
Manufacturing0%
US avg: 0.4%
Wholesale trade0%
US avg: 6.9%
Retail trade0%
US avg: 9.9%
Transportation & warehousing0%
US avg: 2.2%
Finance & insurance0%
US avg: 5.9%
Professional, scientific, technical0%
US avg: 5.1%
Education & health services0%
US avg: 0.9%
Arts, entertainment, food0%
US avg: 1.9%
Other services0%
US avg: 6.7%
Public administration0%
US avg: 4.8%
BARS: THIS PLACE · TICKS: US AVERAGE
Section 03

Housing

Median home value
$779,900
+232%inflation adjusted, since 2000
from $129,000 in 2000
US average: $376,019
2000 – 2024
Owner-occupied
83.6%
−3.7 ptssince 2000
from 87.3% in 2000
16.4% rent
Vacancy rate
87.5%
−1.9 ptssince 2009
from 89.3% in 2009
US average: 10.0%
Owner cost-burdened
76.0%
+21.2 ptssince 2009
from 54.8% in 2009
US average: 22.9%
Renter cost-burdened
22.6%
+22.6 ptssince 2014
from 0.0% in 2014
US average: 47.4%
RELATED:See current rent listings in Munds Park on RentDataNow
Section 04

Race & ethnicity

2000
White, non-Hispanic91.6%(1,145)
Black0.3%(4)
Hispanic / Latino5.7%(71)
Asian0.2%(3)
Other0%
Diversity Score15%(188)
2024
White, non-Hispanic100%(608)
Black0%(0)
Hispanic / Latino0%(0)
Asian0%(0)
Other0%(0)
Diversity Score0%(0)
Diversity Score
0
−100%since 2000
from 15 in 2000
2000 – 2024
Section 05

Education

Bachelor's degree or higher
37.4%
+11.8 ptssince 2000
from 25.6% in 2000
US average: 35.6%
High school or higher
93.1%
+3.4 ptssince 2000
from 89.8% in 2000
US average: 89.6%
Graduate degree
21.8%
+15.3 ptssince 2000
from 6.5% in 2000
US average: 14.0%
Section 06

Commute & transportation

Drive alone to work
100.0%
+32.1 ptssince 2009
from 67.9% in 2009
US average: 68.9%
Carpooled to work
0.0%
−9.9 ptssince 2009
from 9.9% in 2009
US average: 8.5%
Public transit
0.0%
Unchangedsince 2009
from 0.0% in 2009
US average: 3.2%
Worked from home
0.0%
−22.2 ptssince 2009
from 22.2% in 2009
US average: 15.0%
Walked to work
0.0%
Unchangedsince 2009
from 0.0% in 2009
US average: 2.4%
Biked to work
0.0%
Unchangedsince 2009
from 0.0% in 2009
US average: 0.4%
No vehicle available
0.0%
Unchangedsince 2009
from 0.0% in 2009
US average: 8.3%
Section 07

Work & employment

Unemployment rate
32.7%
+32.7 ptssince 2011
from 0.0% in 2011
US average: 5.2%
Labor force participation
24.7%
−34.1 ptssince 2011
from 58.8% in 2011
US average: 63.5%
Self-employed
0.0%
−18.1 ptssince 2009
from 18.1% in 2009
US average: 13.1%
Management & professional
14.1%
−42.9 ptssince 2009
from 57.0% in 2009
US average: 42.5%
Section 08

People & community

Male
51.8%
+7.1 ptssince 2009
from 44.7% in 2009
Female
48.2%
−7.1 ptssince 2009
from 55.3% in 2009
Foreign born
7.2%
−1.2 ptssince 2009
from 8.4% in 2009
US average: 14.1%
Veterans
0.0%
−46.2 ptssince 2009
from 46.2% in 2009
US average: 6.2%
With a disability
27.0%
+20.1 ptssince 2012
from 6.9% in 2012
US average: 13.3%
Uninsured
4.3%
−93.9 ptssince 2013
from 98.2% in 2013
US average: 8.4%
Broadband at home
79.9%
−9.9 ptssince 2017
from 89.8% in 2017
US average: 91.0%
English only at home
100.0%
Unchangedsince 2016
from 100.0% in 2016
US average: 77.7%
Spanish at home
0.0%
Unchangedsince 2016
from 0.0% in 2016
US average: 13.6%
Drill deeper

Places similar to Munds Park

St. Lucie
Pop 642
Ponce de Leon
Pop 521
Micanopy
Pop 653
Colbert
Pop 679
Places similar to Munds Park
Head to head

Compare Munds Park to nearby cities

MUNDS PARK VS
Sedona
Income$73,738
Home value$786,800+1%
Population9,619+1482%
SEE FULL COMPARISON →
MUNDS PARK VS
Flagstaff
Income$71,512
Home value$552,900−29%
Population77,260+12607%
SEE FULL COMPARISON →
MUNDS PARK VS
Cottonwood
Income$48,448
Home value$324,100−58%
Population12,709+1990%
SEE FULL COMPARISON →
MUNDS PARK VS
Verde
Income$69,331
Home value$354,200−55%
Population11,930+1862%
SEE FULL COMPARISON →
Frequently asked

How many people live in Munds Park, Arizona?

Munds Park, Arizona has about 608 residents according to the 2024 American Community Survey.

Is Munds Park, Arizona expensive?

In Munds Park, Arizona, the median home is worth about $779,900.

How educated are people in Munds Park, Arizona?

About 37.4% of adults age 25 and over in Munds Park, Arizona hold a bachelor's degree or higher.

What is the poverty rate in Munds Park, Arizona?

About 52.3% of people in Munds Park, Arizona live below the federal poverty line.

Keep going

Explore from here

Up the hierarchy
Arizona
Rankings
Highest income citiesFastest growing citiesMost educated cities
Compare
Compare Munds Park with another place

DATA: US CENSUS BUREAU ACS 5-YEAR + DECENNIAL CENSUS · UPDATED 2024

How we source and harmonize this data →