CensusEasy
HOUSING

US cities where real rent has grown most since 2000

Maricopa, Arizona's median gross rent is +$1,362 higher in real terms than in 2000, the largest real increase among US cities of 50,000 or more.

By CensusEasy Data Team·May 24, 2026·5 min read·Data: Census 2000 + ACS 5-year 2020-2024, CPI-U through 2024
US cities where real rent has grown most since 2000

Rent has outpaced inflation almost everywhere in the United States since 2000, but the gap between fastest and slowest cities is large. After converting 2000 gross rent to 2024 dollars using the BLS CPI, the 25 cities where the typical renter is now paying the most additional inflation-adjusted dollars are below.

Maricopa, Arizona leads at +$1,362 added to the median gross rent in real terms.

#Place2000 (in 2024 $)LatestChange
1Maricopa, Arizona$636$1,998+$1,362
2Brentwood, California$1,512$2,758+$1,246
3Celina, Texas$1,153$2,379+$1,226
4Herriman, Utah$807$2,019+$1,212
5Buckeye, Arizona$789$1,963+$1,174
6Hoboken, New Jersey$1,825$2,938+$1,113
7Encinitas, California$1,780$2,886+$1,106
8Fulshear, Texas$880$1,952+$1,072
9Cambridge, Massachusetts$1,752$2,787+$1,035
10Palo Alto, California$2,457$3,484+$1,027
11Saratoga Springs, Utah$1,230$2,256+$1,026
12Newport Beach, California$2,290$3,316+$1,026
13Medford, Massachusetts$1,492$2,509+$1,017
14Chino Hills, California$1,885$2,894+$1,009
15Tracy, California$1,470$2,478+$1,008
16Carlsbad, California$1,802$2,808+$1,006
17Boca Raton, Florida$1,543$2,508+$965
18Santa Monica, California$1,443$2,402+$959
19Camarillo, California$1,776$2,734+$958
20Redwood City, California$2,013$2,968+$955
21San Mateo, California$2,128$3,077+$949
22Chula Vista, California$1,288$2,229+$941
23Chino, California$1,401$2,336+$935
24Lake Elsinore, California$1,153$2,078+$925
25Somerville, Massachusetts$1,592$2,517+$925

Key findings

  • Maricopa, Arizona leads the list at +$1,362.
  • The 25th-ranked city on this list — Somerville, Massachusetts — shows +$925.
  • Across the full universe of 871 city rows with both data points, the typical change was +$362.
  • The top gainers concentrate in California (14 of the top 25), Massachusetts (3 of the top 25), Arizona (2 of the top 25).

Where the pattern sits geographically

California (14 of the top 25), Massachusetts (3 of the top 25), Arizona (2 of the top 25) together account for the bulk of the top of this list. Click any city above to open its CensusEasy page, which carries the full historical time series for every metric we publish (income, education, housing, commute, race composition, industry mix), plus its rank within its state and its national percentile on each metric.

How to read this

This ranking is sorted by absolute change, not by percentage change. Absolute change is the figure that lines up with how readers experience these numbers in everyday life ("the typical household here earns $X more than in 1990"). The percentage-change framing surfaces a different set of city rows — usually places that started from a low base — and we publish those rankings separately on the rankings pages.

A single metric never tells the whole story. The smallest gain on this list can reflect either change in the same population staying in place, or compositional change as some residents leave and others arrive. Companion studies on poverty, education, and housing cost together describe the fuller picture.

"Gross rent" includes contract rent plus tenant-paid utilities, so the comparison captures the full housing cost, not just the headline rent number.

Methodology

Median gross rent (contract rent plus tenant-paid utilities), 2000 (Decennial SF3 H063) versus the latest ACS 5-year (B25064). 2000 dollars converted to 2024 dollars using the BLS CPI-U: a 2000 dollar equals 1.822 2024 dollars. Cities with at least 50,000 residents and both data points are included.

Download the data

The full underlying ranking is available as a CSV — every place with both data points, not just the top rows shown above. Columns: rank, place, state, baseline value, latest value, change, and the CensusEasy URL for each place.

us-cities-where-real-rent-grew-most-since-2000.csv
How to cite this report

You may cite or republish these findings, and the downloadable dataset is licensed under CC BY 4.0. Reuse requires that you credit CensusEasy and link back to this page so readers can verify the underlying data.

CensusEasy Data Team (2026). "US cities where real rent has grown most since 2000." CensusEasy. Retrieved from https://censuseasy.com/studies/us-cities-where-real-rent-grew-most-since-2000
Sources
  • 1990 Decennial Census — Summary Tape File 3A (STF3A), public-domain CD-ROM extracts. Median household income from P080, education attainment from P057, mean commute time computed from P049.
  • American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates — US Census Bureau, latest published vintage, Tables B19013 (income), B15003 (education), B08303 / B08013 (commute), B25077 (home value).
  • Decennial Census 2020 — for population and density baselines.
  • BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI-U) — annual averages, used to convert nominal dollars to 2024 dollars. Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics.
  • The full underlying tables for every place are available on each place's CensusEasy page; click any row in this study to open the place page.
Written by
CensusEasy Data Team

CensusEasy publishes original research grounded in US Census Bureau data. Every study includes the underlying numbers, methodology, and sources so readers can verify or extend the analysis.

Data note. Figures in this report are derived from US Census Bureau and Bureau of Labor Statistics data, including American Community Survey estimates that carry sampling margins of error. This information is provided as is, for general informational purposes, without warranty of accuracy or completeness. CensusEasy is not affiliated with or endorsed by the US Census Bureau or any government agency. See our Terms of Use for details.