RANKING · 2020 CENSUS · 97 SHOWN OF 97

Most tech & information jobs, Utah cities · 2020

Utah cities ranked by the share of employed residents working in the information sector (2023 ACS). This list covers the 97 cities in Utah that qualify, ranked against each other statewide.

UtahAll statesPop > 5KAll rankings

SAME RANKING BYCounties States Metros ZIP codes

YEAR2010 2020 2024

RANKPLACESTATEPOPINFORMATIONVS 2000

01Stansbury Park, UTUT11,24223.1%–

02Washington Terrace, UTUT9,07520.3%–

03Ivins, UTUT11,54619.4%–

04Santa Clara, UTUT8,72218.0%–

05Washington, UTUT37,10716.7%–

06Payson, UTUT24,63016.6%–

07Vernal, UTUT10,67115.8%–

08Moab, UTUT5,20615.5%–

09Saratoga Springs, UTUT61,39715.2%–

10Pleasant Grove, UTUT37,77315.1%–

11Tooele, UTUT42,27014.8%–

12North Ogden, UTUT21,68914.7%–

13Hyde Park, UTUT5,78614.5%–

14Roy, UTUT38,79414.5%–

15Highland, UTUT21,57114.4%–

16Kaysville, UTUT33,30714.0%–

17Kanab, UTUT5,33214.0%–

18Murray, UTUT53,29713.6%–

19Richfield, UTUT8,47813.3%–

20Grantsville, UTUT16,47213.2%–

21South Ogden, UTUT17,71013.0%–

22American Fork, UTUT41,02013.0%–

23St. George, UTUT108,71312.9%–

24Cedar City, UTUT41,87112.8%–

25Farmington, UTUT26,26612.8%–

26Sunset, UTUT5,54912.8%–

27Spanish Fork, UTUT48,83712.8%–

28Clinton, UTUT23,79712.7%–

29Heber, UTUT19,65112.7%–

30Logan, UTUT55,57612.6%–

31Roosevelt, UTUT7,03212.6%–

32North Salt Lake, UTUT23,58812.4%–

33Syracuse, UTUT39,90912.4%–

34Riverton, UTUT47,39512.3%–

35Santaquin, UTUT18,98912.3%–

36White City metro, UTUT5,14612.3%–

37South Weber, UTUT8,21812.3%–

38Perry, UTUT6,22612.2%–

39Bluffdale, UTUT19,50612.2%–

40Sandy, UTUT92,38612.2%–

41Park City, UTUT8,58712.1%–

42South Salt Lake, UTUT26,93412.0%–

43Hurricane, UTUT25,74512.0%–

44West Valley City, UTUT137,49111.9%–

45Lindon, UTUT12,01511.9%–

46Layton, UTUT85,30811.9%–

47Eagle Mountain, UTUT66,55711.8%–

48Lehi, UTUT95,31311.6%–

49Pleasant View, UTUT11,42311.6%–

50Orem, UTUT95,21411.5%–

51Midvale, UTUT36,09911.5%–

52Herriman, UTUT63,28211.4%–

53Nibley, UTUT8,97511.4%–

54Riverdale, UTUT9,20611.4%–

55Ogden, UTUT89,51011.3%–

56South Jordan, UTUT87,61411.2%–

57Woods Cross, UTUT11,42911.2%–

58Brigham City, UTUT20,63311.2%–

59West Jordan, UTUT116,81211.2%–

60Hooper, UTUT9,74110.9%–

61Cottonwood Heights, UTUT32,26510.9%–

62Provo, UTUT114,52710.8%–

63Alpine, UTUT10,44410.8%–

64Millcreek, UTUT63,92610.7%–

65Mapleton, UTUT16,27510.7%–

66Springville, UTUT35,67010.6%–

67Kearns metro, UTUT35,40410.6%–

68Bountiful, UTUT44,98810.6%–

69Taylorsville, UTUT57,48410.5%–

70Hyrum, UTUT11,13210.5%–

71Enoch, UTUT8,84710.4%–

72Midway, UTUT6,01110.4%–

73Clearfield, UTUT35,14410.3%–

74Vineyard, UTUT16,09210.3%–

75Holladay, UTUT31,16210.3%–

76Cedar Hills, UTUT9,75510.2%–

77Farr West, UTUT8,16310.0%–

78Draper, UTUT50,65210.0%–

79Tremonton, UTUT12,9349.9%–

80Nephi, UTUT7,4889.9%–

81West Point, UTUT13,0589.9%–

82Plain City, UTUT9,2569.8%–

83Ephraim, UTUT6,3939.8%–

84Summit Park, UTUT8,5379.6%–

85Smithfield, UTUT15,1539.6%–

86North Logan, UTUT11,6089.3%–

87Magna metro, UTUT35,4019.0%–

88Salem, UTUT12,2349.0%–

89Salt Lake City, UTUT218,4288.8%–

90Providence, UTUT9,5398.4%–

91Harrisville, UTUT7,1548.2%–

92West Haven, UTUT25,6277.9%–

93Price, UTUT8,3687.4%–

94Centerville, UTUT16,4807.0%–

95West Bountiful, UTUT5,9316.7%–

96Fruit Heights, UTUT5,9526.3%–

97Snyderville, UTUT5,9486.0%–

SHOWING 1–97 OF 97

Download CSV (full list, 97 rows)

UPDATED 2026-06-02 · DATA: US CENSUS BUREAU ACS 5-YEAR ESTIMATES