RANKING · 2010 CENSUS · 97 SHOWN OF 97

Most tech & information jobs, Utah cities · 2010

Utah cities ranked by the share of employed residents working in the information sector (2010 ACS). This list covers the 97 cities in Utah that qualify, ranked against each other statewide. The median across all 97 is 12.6%.

UtahAll statesPop > 5KAll rankings

SAME RANKING BYCounties States Metros ZIP codes

YEAR2010 2020 2024

RANKPLACESTATEPOPINFORMATIONVS –

01Vineyard, UTUT16,09222.0%–

02Hurricane, UTUT25,74520.9%–

03Santa Clara, UTUT8,72220.6%–

04Alpine, UTUT10,44417.9%–

05Grantsville, UTUT16,47217.6%–

06Tremonton, UTUT12,93417.6%–

07Sunset, UTUT5,54917.5%–

08Tooele, UTUT42,27016.8%–

09Ivins, UTUT11,54616.7%–

10Highland, UTUT21,57116.4%–

11Washington, UTUT37,10716.0%–

12Price, UTUT8,36815.9%–

13Layton, UTUT85,30815.7%–

14St. George, UTUT108,71315.7%–

15Richfield, UTUT8,47815.5%–

16Payson, UTUT24,63015.4%–

17Providence, UTUT9,53915.3%–

18Eagle Mountain, UTUT66,55715.0%–

19Moab, UTUT5,20614.8%–

20Brigham City, UTUT20,63314.8%–

21Springville, UTUT35,67014.7%–

22South Salt Lake, UTUT26,93414.7%–

23American Fork, UTUT41,02014.5%–

24Riverton, UTUT47,39514.3%–

25Riverdale, UTUT9,20614.3%–

26South Ogden, UTUT17,71014.2%–

27Midvale, UTUT36,09914.1%–

28Lindon, UTUT12,01514.0%–

29Roosevelt, UTUT7,03213.9%–

30West Haven, UTUT25,62713.8%–

31Orem, UTUT95,21413.7%–

32Clearfield, UTUT35,14413.6%–

33North Logan, UTUT11,60813.5%–

34Taylorsville, UTUT57,48413.3%–

35Lehi, UTUT95,31313.3%–

36Hyrum, UTUT11,13213.3%–

37Kearns metro, UTUT35,40413.2%–

38Vernal, UTUT10,67113.1%–

39Sandy, UTUT92,38613.0%–

40Cedar City, UTUT41,87113.0%–

41Spanish Fork, UTUT48,83713.0%–

42Magna metro, UTUT35,40113.0%–

43Enoch, UTUT8,84713.0%–

44West Bountiful, UTUT5,93113.0%–

45Cedar Hills, UTUT9,75512.9%–

46West Jordan, UTUT116,81212.8%–

47Draper, UTUT50,65212.7%–

48Millcreek, UTUT63,92612.7%–

49Logan, UTUT55,57612.6%–

50Bountiful, UTUT44,98812.6%–

51Pleasant Grove, UTUT37,77312.5%–

52Farr West, UTUT8,16312.4%–

53Clinton, UTUT23,79712.3%–

54Kaysville, UTUT33,30712.3%–

55Smithfield, UTUT15,15312.2%–

56Cottonwood Heights, UTUT32,26512.1%–

57Holladay, UTUT31,16212.1%–

58Syracuse, UTUT39,90911.8%–

59Heber, UTUT19,65111.7%–

60Santaquin, UTUT18,98911.7%–

61Murray, UTUT53,29711.6%–

62Farmington, UTUT26,26611.5%–

63Midway, UTUT6,01111.5%–

64West Valley City, UTUT137,49111.5%–

65Roy, UTUT38,79411.5%–

66Ogden, UTUT89,51011.4%–

67West Point, UTUT13,05811.4%–

68Provo, UTUT114,52711.2%–

69Harrisville, UTUT7,15411.0%–

70South Jordan, UTUT87,61410.9%–

71Bluffdale, UTUT19,50610.9%–

72Salem, UTUT12,23410.8%–

73Centerville, UTUT16,48010.7%–

74Saratoga Springs, UTUT61,39710.7%–

75Mapleton, UTUT16,27510.6%–

76Washington Terrace, UTUT9,07510.3%–

77Ephraim, UTUT6,39310.2%–

78Plain City, UTUT9,25610.1%–

79Woods Cross, UTUT11,42910.1%–

80Pleasant View, UTUT11,42310.0%–

81Summit Park, UTUT8,53710.0%–

82Salt Lake City, UTUT218,4289.7%–

83Hyde Park, UTUT5,7869.7%–

84White City metro, UTUT5,1469.6%–

85North Salt Lake, UTUT23,5889.5%–

86Nephi, UTUT7,4889.5%–

87Park City, UTUT8,5879.3%–

88Herriman, UTUT63,2829.2%–

89Stansbury Park, UTUT11,2429.1%–

90Fruit Heights, UTUT5,9528.9%–

91Nibley, UTUT8,9758.5%–

92South Weber, UTUT8,2188.1%–

93North Ogden, UTUT21,6897.5%–

94Perry, UTUT6,2267.5%–

95Hooper, UTUT9,7416.7%–

96Kanab, UTUT5,3326.2%–

97Snyderville, UTUT5,9485.6%–

SHOWING 1–97 OF 97

Download CSV (full list, 97 rows)

UPDATED 2026-09-11 · DATA: US CENSUS BUREAU DECENNIAL CENSUS