RANKING · 2010 CENSUS · 97 SHOWN OF 97

Highest housing vacancy, Utah cities · 2010

Utah cities ranked by the share of housing units that are vacant (2023 ACS). This list covers the 97 cities in Utah that qualify, ranked against each other statewide.

Flip the list · Tightest housing markets, US cities →

UtahAll statesPop > 5KAll rankings

SAME RANKING BYCounties States Metros ZIP codes

YEAR2010 2024

RANKPLACESTATEPOPHOUSING VACANCY RATEVS 2000

01Park City, UTUT8,58764.0%–

02Snyderville, UTUT5,94841.4%–

03Midway, UTUT6,01129.6%–

04Ephraim, UTUT6,39319.0%–

05St. George, UTUT108,71318.8%–

06Washington, UTUT37,10716.8%–

07Summit Park, UTUT8,53715.7%–

08Ivins, UTUT11,54615.5%–

09Moab, UTUT5,20614.3%–

10Hurricane, UTUT25,74511.5%–

11Cedar City, UTUT41,87110.3%–

12Vernal, UTUT10,6719.9%–

13South Salt Lake, UTUT26,9349.7%–

14Alpine, UTUT10,4449.7%–

15Tremonton, UTUT12,9349.4%–

16Price, UTUT8,3689.2%–

17Kanab, UTUT5,3329.2%–

18Ogden, UTUT89,5109.1%–

19Richfield, UTUT8,4788.9%–

20Santa Clara, UTUT8,7228.6%–

21Salt Lake City, UTUT218,4288.5%–

22Clearfield, UTUT35,1448.5%–

23Vineyard, UTUT16,0927.9%–

24Millcreek, UTUT63,9267.9%–

25West Haven, UTUT25,6277.7%–

26Midvale, UTUT36,0997.1%–

27Enoch, UTUT8,8477.0%–

28Smithfield, UTUT15,1537.0%–

29Cottonwood Heights, UTUT32,2656.9%–

30Murray, UTUT53,2976.7%–

31Holladay, UTUT31,1626.6%–

32Provo, UTUT114,5276.5%–

33Draper, UTUT50,6526.4%–

34Brigham City, UTUT20,6336.2%–

35Logan, UTUT55,5766.2%–

36Herriman, UTUT63,2826.1%–

37Spanish Fork, UTUT48,8376.0%–

38Pleasant View, UTUT11,4235.9%–

39Sunset, UTUT5,5495.7%–

40Salem, UTUT12,2345.7%–

41Syracuse, UTUT39,9095.7%–

42Grantsville, UTUT16,4725.6%–

43Hyrum, UTUT11,1325.5%–

44Providence, UTUT9,5395.4%–

45Eagle Mountain, UTUT66,5575.4%–

46North Salt Lake, UTUT23,5885.4%–

47Saratoga Springs, UTUT61,3975.3%–

48Woods Cross, UTUT11,4295.3%–

49Layton, UTUT85,3085.2%–

50Washington Terrace, UTUT9,0755.1%–

51Perry, UTUT6,2265.0%–

52White City metro, UTUT5,1464.9%–

53Nephi, UTUT7,4884.9%–

54American Fork, UTUT41,0204.9%–

55Santaquin, UTUT18,9894.8%–

56Pleasant Grove, UTUT37,7734.8%–

57Roy, UTUT38,7944.6%–

58Riverdale, UTUT9,2064.6%–

59Magna metro, UTUT35,4014.4%–

60West Valley City, UTUT137,4914.4%–

61West Point, UTUT13,0584.3%–

62Bountiful, UTUT44,9884.1%–

63Sandy, UTUT92,3864.1%–

64Roosevelt, UTUT7,0324.1%–

65Lehi, UTUT95,3134.0%–

66Taylorsville, UTUT57,4844.0%–

67North Ogden, UTUT21,6894.0%–

68Hooper, UTUT9,7413.8%–

69Kearns metro, UTUT35,4043.8%–

70Highland, UTUT21,5713.6%–

71Tooele, UTUT42,2703.6%–

72North Logan, UTUT11,6083.6%–

73Payson, UTUT24,6303.5%–

74Orem, UTUT95,2143.5%–

75Bluffdale, UTUT19,5063.4%–

76South Jordan, UTUT87,6143.3%–

77Centerville, UTUT16,4803.2%–

78Springville, UTUT35,6703.1%–

79Riverton, UTUT47,3952.8%–

80Kaysville, UTUT33,3072.8%–

81Mapleton, UTUT16,2752.8%–

82Heber, UTUT19,6512.7%–

83Hyde Park, UTUT5,7862.7%–

84West Jordan, UTUT116,8122.7%–

85South Ogden, UTUT17,7102.6%–

86Clinton, UTUT23,7972.5%–

87Plain City, UTUT9,2562.0%–

88Farmington, UTUT26,2661.6%–

89Stansbury Park, UTUT11,2421.6%–

90South Weber, UTUT8,2181.4%–

91Nibley, UTUT8,9751.3%–

92Harrisville, UTUT7,1541.0%–

93Cedar Hills, UTUT9,7550.8%–

94Farr West, UTUT8,1630.8%–

95Fruit Heights, UTUT5,9520.0%–

96Lindon, UTUT12,0150.0%–

97West Bountiful, UTUT5,9310.0%–

SHOWING 1–97 OF 97

Download CSV (full list, 97 rows)

UPDATED 2026-06-02 · DATA: US CENSUS BUREAU ACS 5-YEAR ESTIMATES