RANKING · 1990 CENSUS · 86 SHOWN OF 86

Highest renter share, Utah cities · 1990

Utah cities with the highest share of renter-occupied housing units (1990 ACS). This list covers the 86 cities in Utah that qualify, ranked against each other statewide. The median across all 86 is 20.9%.

UtahAll statesPop > 5KAll rankings

SAME RANKING BYCounties States Metros ZIP codes

YEAR1990 2000 2010 2020 2024

RANKPLACESTATEPOPRENTER-OCCUPIEDVS –

01South Salt Lake, UTUT26,93461.1%–

02Millcreek, UTUT63,92660.3%–

03Provo, UTUT114,52760.1%–

04Midvale, UTUT36,09959.5%–

05Logan, UTUT55,57656.8%–

06Salt Lake City, UTUT218,42850.6%–

07Park City, UTUT8,58746.6%–

08Clearfield, UTUT35,14445.2%–

09Ogden, UTUT89,51041.2%–

10Murray, UTUT53,29739.0%–

11Ephraim, UTUT6,39337.7%–

12Vernal, UTUT10,67136.8%–

13Cedar City, UTUT41,87136.6%–

14Vineyard, UTUT16,09236.4%–

15St. George, UTUT108,71334.2%–

16Riverdale, UTUT9,20634.1%–

17North Salt Lake, UTUT23,58833.8%–

18Price, UTUT8,36833.7%–

19Orem, UTUT95,21432.1%–

20Springville, UTUT35,67031.7%–

21Woods Cross, UTUT11,42931.6%–

22Moab, UTUT5,20630.8%–

23Washington Terrace, UTUT9,07529.8%–

24Sunset, UTUT5,54929.8%–

25Roosevelt, UTUT7,03229.4%–

26Layton, UTUT85,30827.8%–

27South Ogden, UTUT17,71027.5%–

28Spanish Fork, UTUT48,83726.2%–

29Cottonwood Heights, UTUT32,26526.2%–

30Tooele, UTUT42,27025.5%–

31Brigham City, UTUT20,63325.1%–

32Richfield, UTUT8,47825.0%–

33American Fork, UTUT41,02024.6%–

34Tremonton, UTUT12,93424.5%–

35Bountiful, UTUT44,98823.6%–

36Nephi, UTUT7,48823.2%–

37Grantsville, UTUT16,47222.1%–

38Payson, UTUT24,63022.0%–

39Hurricane, UTUT25,74521.8%–

40Lehi, UTUT95,31321.4%–

41West Jordan, UTUT116,81221.2%–

42Kaysville, UTUT33,30721.2%–

43Ivins, UTUT11,54620.9%–

44Midway, UTUT6,01120.9%–

45Kanab, UTUT5,33220.7%–

46Pleasant Grove, UTUT37,77320.7%–

47North Logan, UTUT11,60820.0%–

48Washington, UTUT37,10719.7%–

49Draper, UTUT50,65219.5%–

50Roy, UTUT38,79419.5%–

51Hyrum, UTUT11,13219.4%–

52Perry, UTUT6,22619.0%–

53Santaquin, UTUT18,98919.0%–

54Magna metro, UTUT35,40118.6%–

55West Point, UTUT13,05817.3%–

56Smithfield, UTUT15,15316.7%–

57Centerville, UTUT16,48015.5%–

58Syracuse, UTUT39,90915.4%–

59Alpine, UTUT10,44415.2%–

60Hyde Park, UTUT5,78615.1%–

61White City metro, UTUT5,14615.1%–

62Kearns metro, UTUT35,40414.4%–

63Farmington, UTUT26,26614.4%–

64Bluffdale, UTUT19,50613.7%–

65Santa Clara, UTUT8,72213.7%–

66Stansbury Park, UTUT11,24212.8%–

67Lindon, UTUT12,01512.6%–

68Clinton, UTUT23,79711.8%–

69Mapleton, UTUT16,27511.6%–

70Salem, UTUT12,23411.4%–

71Cedar Hills, UTUT9,75511.3%–

72Providence, UTUT9,53911.2%–

73North Ogden, UTUT21,68911.2%–

74Pleasant View, UTUT11,42310.9%–

75West Bountiful, UTUT5,93110.4%–

76Enoch, UTUT8,84710.3%–

77Plain City, UTUT9,25610.2%–

78Riverton, UTUT47,39510.1%–

79South Weber, UTUT8,2189.9%–

80Harrisville, UTUT7,1549.3%–

81South Jordan, UTUT87,6148.9%–

82Nibley, UTUT8,9758.9%–

83Farr West, UTUT8,1638.5%–

84Hooper, UTUT9,7417.3%–

85Fruit Heights, UTUT5,9527.3%–

86Highland, UTUT21,5714.6%–

SHOWING 1–86 OF 86

Download CSV (full list, 86 rows)

UPDATED 2026-09-11 · DATA: US CENSUS BUREAU DECENNIAL CENSUS