RANKING · 2024 ACS · 97 SHOWN OF 97

Highest labor force participation, Utah cities

Utah cities ranked by the share of adults 16+ in the civilian labor force (2023 ACS). This list covers the 97 cities in Utah that qualify, ranked against each other statewide.

Flip the list · Lowest labor force participation, US cities →

UtahAll statesPop > 5KAll rankings

SAME RANKING BYCounties States Metros ZIP codes

YEAR2020 2024

RANKPLACESTATEPOPLABOR FORCE PARTICIPATIONVS 2000

01Vineyard, UTUT16,09282.8%–

02Woods Cross, UTUT11,42979.6%–

03Bluffdale, UTUT19,50678.9%–

04Sunset, UTUT5,54977.6%–

05Stansbury Park, UTUT11,24276.8%–

06South Salt Lake, UTUT26,93476.5%–

07Herriman, UTUT63,28276.3%–

08Syracuse, UTUT39,90976.1%–

09Harrisville, UTUT7,15476.0%–

10Eagle Mountain, UTUT66,55775.9%–

11Midvale, UTUT36,09975.7%–

12Heber, UTUT19,65175.6%–

13Lehi, UTUT95,31375.6%–

14West Jordan, UTUT116,81275.5%–

15West Point, UTUT13,05874.5%–

16Santaquin, UTUT18,98974.0%–

17Logan, UTUT55,57673.9%–

18Kearns metro, UTUT35,40473.8%–

19West Haven, UTUT25,62773.6%–

20Nibley, UTUT8,97573.2%–

21Farr West, UTUT8,16373.2%–

22West Valley City, UTUT137,49173.1%–

23Salt Lake City, UTUT218,42873.0%–

24North Salt Lake, UTUT23,58873.0%–

25Riverton, UTUT47,39573.0%–

26Provo, UTUT114,52772.8%–

27Saratoga Springs, UTUT61,39772.8%–

28Layton, UTUT85,30872.7%–

29American Fork, UTUT41,02072.6%–

30Grantsville, UTUT16,47272.5%–

31Roy, UTUT38,79472.4%–

32White City metro, UTUT5,14672.1%–

33Salem, UTUT12,23472.1%–

34Summit Park, UTUT8,53771.9%–

35Orem, UTUT95,21471.7%–

36Tremonton, UTUT12,93471.7%–

37Nephi, UTUT7,48871.5%–

38Springville, UTUT35,67071.5%–

39Tooele, UTUT42,27071.5%–

40Spanish Fork, UTUT48,83771.4%–

41Smithfield, UTUT15,15371.0%–

42South Jordan, UTUT87,61470.9%–

43Taylorsville, UTUT57,48470.7%–

44Snyderville, UTUT5,94870.4%–

45Clinton, UTUT23,79770.4%–

46Plain City, UTUT9,25670.2%–

47North Ogden, UTUT21,68970.0%–

48Millcreek, UTUT63,92669.9%–

49Moab, UTUT5,20669.9%–

50Magna metro, UTUT35,40169.9%–

51Murray, UTUT53,29769.9%–

52Payson, UTUT24,63069.8%–

53Cottonwood Heights, UTUT32,26569.7%–

54South Weber, UTUT8,21869.6%–

55Sandy, UTUT92,38669.4%–

56Hyrum, UTUT11,13269.3%–

57Perry, UTUT6,22669.2%–

58Ogden, UTUT89,51069.1%–

59South Ogden, UTUT17,71069.1%–

60Hooper, UTUT9,74169.0%–

61Clearfield, UTUT35,14468.8%–

62Pleasant Grove, UTUT37,77368.7%–

63North Logan, UTUT11,60868.3%–

64Draper, UTUT50,65268.1%–

65Kaysville, UTUT33,30767.7%–

66Bountiful, UTUT44,98867.3%–

67Park City, UTUT8,58767.1%–

68Hyde Park, UTUT5,78667.0%–

69Pleasant View, UTUT11,42366.6%–

70Riverdale, UTUT9,20666.6%–

71Cedar City, UTUT41,87166.3%–

72Roosevelt, UTUT7,03265.9%–

73Enoch, UTUT8,84765.4%–

74Farmington, UTUT26,26665.3%–

75Centerville, UTUT16,48065.3%–

76Cedar Hills, UTUT9,75565.1%–

77Holladay, UTUT31,16265.1%–

78Washington Terrace, UTUT9,07564.3%–

79Fruit Heights, UTUT5,95264.2%–

80Lindon, UTUT12,01564.1%–

81Highland, UTUT21,57163.6%–

82Santa Clara, UTUT8,72263.6%–

83Providence, UTUT9,53963.6%–

84West Bountiful, UTUT5,93163.4%–

85Ephraim, UTUT6,39363.3%–

86Vernal, UTUT10,67162.5%–

87Brigham City, UTUT20,63362.4%–

88Mapleton, UTUT16,27562.3%–

89Midway, UTUT6,01161.6%–

90Kanab, UTUT5,33261.4%–

91Richfield, UTUT8,47860.0%–

92Washington, UTUT37,10759.8%–

93St. George, UTUT108,71358.7%–

94Price, UTUT8,36857.9%–

95Alpine, UTUT10,44457.8%–

96Hurricane, UTUT25,74554.0%–

97Ivins, UTUT11,54647.4%–

SHOWING 1–97 OF 97

Download CSV (full list, 97 rows)

UPDATED 2026-06-02 · DATA: US CENSUS BUREAU ACS 5-YEAR ESTIMATES