CensusEasy
CITY · 2010 ACS

Ewing

Kentucky · 264 residents · 0.25 sq mi
Time machine
COMPARE TO
Compare
The short version

Ewing has notably lower household income than the US average, with a median household income of $34,167. Population has declined 5% since 2000. 14% of adults hold a bachelor's degree or higher, below the national rate of 28%. Median home value is $51,100. The poverty rate of 29.6% is well above the national figure.

At a glance
Lower income
below the US median
US median: $52,703
Older
median age 40.8
US median: 37.2
Less educated
14% hold a bachelor's degree
US average: 28%
More affordable
home values down 7%, inflation adjusted
US median home: $225,659
Section 01

Population & growth

Total population
264
−5%since 2000
from 278 in 2000
1990 – 2025
Population density
1,056 / sq mi
−5%since 2000
from 1,112 / sq mi in 2000
US average: 261
Median age
40.8
+16%since 2000
from 35.3 in 2000
US average: 37.2
Population, 1990 – 2024
1952583213834461990201020202024Ewing
2024346
1990201020202024
Section 02

Income & economy

Median household income
$34,167
−16%inflation adjusted, since 2000
from $32,083 in 2000
US average: $52,703
1990 – 2024
Per capita income
$12,670
−21%since 2000
from $15,991 in 2000
US average: $27,286
Households earning $100K+
5.3%
+1.6 ptssince 2009
from 3.7% in 2009
US average: 33.3%
Poverty rate
29.6%
+11.9 ptssince 2000
from 17.6% in 2000
US average: 13.8%
Income inequality (Gini)
0.345
US average: 0.461
Workforce by industry, 2010
Retail trade26.6%
US avg: 10.9%
Agriculture, forestry, fishing16.1%
US avg: 1.9%
Construction16.1%
US avg: 1.4%
Information13.5%
US avg: 11.5%
Wholesale trade5.7%
US avg: 7.2%
Finance & insurance4.2%
US avg: 5.1%
Professional, scientific, technical4.2%
US avg: 4.2%
Transportation & warehousing3.6%
US avg: 3.1%
Manufacturing0%
US avg: 0.5%
Education & health services0%
US avg: 0.9%
Arts, entertainment, food0%
US avg: 2.4%
Other services0%
US avg: 7%
Public administration0%
US avg: 4.9%
BARS: THIS PLACE · TICKS: US AVERAGE
Section 03

Housing

Median home value
$51,100
−7%inflation adjusted, since 2000
from $43,400 in 2000
US average: $225,659
1990 – 2024
Median gross rent
$650
+50%inflation adjusted, since 2000
from $343 in 2000
US average: $853
Owner-occupied
41.4%
−38.0 ptssince 2000
from 79.4% in 2000
24.2% rent
Vacancy rate
17.4%
+8.1 ptssince 2009
from 9.3% in 2009
US average: 12.1%
Owner cost-burdened
22.6%
+0.8 ptssince 2009
from 21.8% in 2009
US average: 30.9%
Renter cost-burdened
41.2%
+8.4 ptssince 2009
from 32.8% in 2009
US average: 46.8%
Afford Score
1.5
+11%since 2000
from 1.4 in 2000
1990 – 2024
RELATED:See current rent listings in Ewing on RentDataNow
Section 04

Race & ethnicity

2000
White, non-Hispanic100%(278)
Black0%(0)
Hispanic / Latino0%(0)
Asian0%(0)
Other0%
Diversity Score0%(0)
2010
White, non-Hispanic98.9%(261)
Black0%(0)
Hispanic / Latino0.4%(1)
Asian0.4%(1)
Other0%(0)
Diversity Score1.9%(5)
Diversity Score
2
from 0 in 2000
1990 – 2024
Section 05

Education

Bachelor's degree or higher
13.9%
+8.8 ptssince 2000
from 5.1% in 2000
US average: 27.9%
High school or higher
77.1%
+16.2 ptssince 2000
from 60.9% in 2000
US average: 84.9%
Graduate degree
6.1%
+4.6 ptssince 2000
from 1.5% in 2000
US average: 10.2%
Section 06

Commute & transportation

Average commute
34.1 min
+17%since 2000
from 29.3 min in 2000
US average: 25.2
Drive alone to work
53.6%
−15.3 ptssince 2009
from 68.9% in 2009
US average: 76.2%
Carpooled to work
34.4%
+6.3 ptssince 2009
from 28.0% in 2009
US average: 10.4%
Public transit
0.0%
Unchangedsince 2009
from 0.0% in 2009
US average: 4.7%
Worked from home
4.7%
+4.7 ptssince 2009
from 0.0% in 2009
US average: 4.1%
Walked to work
7.3%
+4.2 ptssince 2009
from 3.0% in 2009
US average: 2.8%
Biked to work
0.0%
Unchangedsince 2009
from 0.0% in 2009
US average: 0.5%
No vehicle available
1.3%
−0.2 ptssince 2009
from 1.5% in 2009
US average: 8.7%
Section 07

Work & employment

Self-employed
10.9%
−1.3 ptssince 2009
from 12.2% in 2009
US average: 12.9%
Management & professional
21.9%
−36.1 ptssince 2009
from 57.9% in 2009
US average: 35.2%
Section 08

People & community

Male
50.3%
−0.2 ptssince 2009
from 50.5% in 2009
Female
49.7%
+0.2 ptssince 2009
from 49.5% in 2009
Foreign born
1.7%
−0.7 ptssince 2009
from 2.4% in 2009
US average: 12.8%
Veterans
8.0%
−42.9 ptssince 2009
from 51.0% in 2009
US average: 9.9%
Drill deeper

Places similar to Ewing

Ellenton
Pop 220
Oliver
Pop 223
Pulaski
Pop 231
West Canaveral Groves
Pop 224
Places similar to Ewing
Head to head

Compare Ewing to nearby cities

EWING VS
Maysville
Income$39,013+14%
Home value$151,500+196%
Population8,688+3661%
SEE FULL COMPARISON →
EWING VS
Paris
Income$55,839+63%
Home value$186,300+265%
Population10,130+4285%
SEE FULL COMPARISON →
EWING VS
Winchester
Income$54,378+59%
Home value$188,300+268%
Population19,514+8348%
SEE FULL COMPARISON →
EWING VS
Georgetown
Income$80,088+134%
Home value$265,400+419%
Population40,883+17598%
SEE FULL COMPARISON →
Frequently asked

How many people live in Ewing, Kentucky?

Ewing, Kentucky has about 264 residents according to the 2010 American Community Survey.

What is the median household income in Ewing, Kentucky?

The typical household in Ewing, Kentucky earns about $34,167 a year. Half of households make more than that, and half make less.

Is Ewing, Kentucky expensive?

In Ewing, Kentucky, the median home is worth about $51,100, and the typical rent is about $650 a month.

How educated are people in Ewing, Kentucky?

About 13.9% of adults age 25 and over in Ewing, Kentucky hold a bachelor's degree or higher.

What is the poverty rate in Ewing, Kentucky?

About 29.6% of people in Ewing, Kentucky live below the federal poverty line.

Has Ewing, Kentucky grown since 1990?

Yes, Ewing, Kentucky has grown since 1990. The population has added about 42 residents, a change of about 19 percent over that period.

Keep going

Explore from here

Up the hierarchy
Kentucky
Rankings
Highest income citiesFastest growing citiesMost educated cities
Compare
Compare Ewing with another place

DATA: US CENSUS BUREAU ACS 5-YEAR + DECENNIAL CENSUS · UPDATED 2024

How we source and harmonize this data →