CensusEasy
CITY · 2010 ACS

Kingman

Indiana · 511 residents · 0.66 sq mi
Time machine
COMPARE TO
Compare
The short version

Kingman has notably lower household income than the US average, with a median household income of $38,393. Population has declined 5% since 2000. 4% of adults hold a bachelor's degree or higher, below the national rate of 28%. Median home value has risen by half since 2000, reaching $72,900.

At a glance
Lower income
below the US median
US median: $52,703
Mid-age
median age 38.7
US median: 37.2
Less educated
4% hold a bachelor's degree
US average: 28%
Less affordable
home values up 35%, inflation adjusted
US median home: $225,659
Section 01

Population & growth

Total population
511
−5%since 2000
from 538 in 2000
1990 – 2025
Population density
774 / sq mi
−5%since 2000
from 815 / sq mi in 2000
US average: 261
Median age
38.7
+10%since 2000
from 35.1 in 2000
US average: 37.2
Population, 1990 – 2024
3934755576387201990201020202024Kingman
2024693
1990201020202024
Section 02

Income & economy

Median household income
$38,393
+7%inflation adjusted, since 2000
from $28,438 in 2000
US average: $52,703
1990 – 2024
Per capita income
$13,560
+6%since 2000
from $12,815 in 2000
US average: $27,286
Households earning $100K+
12.6%
+1.0 ptssince 2009
from 11.6% in 2009
US average: 33.3%
Poverty rate
20.9%
+4.7 ptssince 2000
from 16.2% in 2000
US average: 13.8%
Income inequality (Gini)
0.379
US average: 0.461
Workforce by industry, 2010
Retail trade35.7%
US avg: 10.9%
Wholesale trade8.3%
US avg: 7.2%
Arts, entertainment, food6%
US avg: 2.4%
Finance & insurance4.8%
US avg: 5.1%
Other services4.8%
US avg: 7%
Transportation & warehousing4.2%
US avg: 3.1%
Information4.2%
US avg: 11.5%
Education & health services3%
US avg: 0.9%
Agriculture, forestry, fishing1.8%
US avg: 1.9%
Construction1.8%
US avg: 1.4%
Professional, scientific, technical1.8%
US avg: 4.2%
Manufacturing0%
US avg: 0.5%
Public administration0%
US avg: 4.9%
BARS: THIS PLACE · TICKS: US AVERAGE
Section 03

Housing

Median home value
$72,900
+35%inflation adjusted, since 2000
from $42,500 in 2000
US average: $225,659
1990 – 2024
Median gross rent
$520
+2%inflation adjusted, since 2000
from $402 in 2000
US average: $853
Owner-occupied
36.4%
−29.2 ptssince 2000
from 65.6% in 2000
35.9% rent
Vacancy rate
20.1%
+3.8 ptssince 2009
from 16.3% in 2009
US average: 12.1%
Owner cost-burdened
25.4%
−13.6 ptssince 2009
from 39.0% in 2009
US average: 30.9%
Renter cost-burdened
27.7%
+1.6 ptssince 2009
from 26.1% in 2009
US average: 46.8%
Afford Score
1.9
+27%since 2000
from 1.5 in 2000
1990 – 2024
RELATED:See current rent listings in Kingman on RentDataNow
Section 04

Race & ethnicity

2000
White, non-Hispanic98.9%(532)
Black0%(0)
Hispanic / Latino0.2%(1)
Asian0%(0)
Other0%
Diversity Score0.5%(3)
2010
White, non-Hispanic97.1%(496)
Black0%(0)
Hispanic / Latino1.4%(7)
Asian0%(0)
Other0%(0)
Diversity Score3.4%(18)
Diversity Score
3
+633%since 2000
from 0 in 2000
1990 – 2024
Section 05

Education

Bachelor's degree or higher
4.4%
−3.3 ptssince 2000
from 7.7% in 2000
US average: 27.9%
High school or higher
70.4%
−10.2 ptssince 2000
from 80.6% in 2000
US average: 84.9%
Graduate degree
2.1%
−1.0 ptssince 2000
from 3.1% in 2000
US average: 10.2%
Section 06

Commute & transportation

Average commute
38.1 min
+88%since 2000
from 20.2 min in 2000
US average: 25.2
Drive alone to work
81.5%
+6.7 ptssince 2009
from 74.9% in 2009
US average: 76.2%
Carpooled to work
12.5%
−5.6 ptssince 2009
from 18.1% in 2009
US average: 10.4%
Public transit
0.0%
Unchangedsince 2009
from 0.0% in 2009
US average: 4.7%
Worked from home
4.2%
−1.4 ptssince 2009
from 5.5% in 2009
US average: 4.1%
Walked to work
1.8%
+0.3 ptssince 2009
from 1.5% in 2009
US average: 2.8%
Biked to work
0.0%
Unchangedsince 2009
from 0.0% in 2009
US average: 0.5%
No vehicle available
4.7%
−0.2 ptssince 2009
from 5.0% in 2009
US average: 8.7%
Section 07

Work & employment

Self-employed
13.7%
+5.8 ptssince 2009
from 7.8% in 2009
US average: 12.9%
Management & professional
19.0%
−19.7 ptssince 2009
from 38.7% in 2009
US average: 35.2%
Section 08

People & community

Male
51.7%
+3.3 ptssince 2009
from 48.4% in 2009
Female
48.3%
−3.3 ptssince 2009
from 51.6% in 2009
Foreign born
0.0%
Unchangedsince 2009
from 0.0% in 2009
US average: 12.8%
Veterans
16.3%
−31.5 ptssince 2009
from 47.8% in 2009
US average: 9.9%
Drill deeper

Places similar to Kingman

Alapaha
Pop 494
Wiscon
Pop 499
Dexter
Pop 694
Altha
Pop 492
Places similar to Kingman
Head to head

Compare Kingman to nearby cities

KINGMAN VS
Crawfordsville
Income$55,033+43%
Home value$134,000+84%
Population16,699+2861%
SEE FULL COMPARISON →
KINGMAN VS
Danville
Income$45,957+20%
Home value$79,000+8%
Population28,138+4889%
SEE FULL COMPARISON →
KINGMAN VS
Brazil
Income$52,055+36%
Home value$113,900+56%
Population8,343+1379%
SEE FULL COMPARISON →
KINGMAN VS
Greencastle
Income$55,565+45%
Home value$169,200+132%
Population9,924+1660%
SEE FULL COMPARISON →
Frequently asked

How many people live in Kingman, Indiana?

Kingman, Indiana has about 511 residents according to the 2010 American Community Survey.

What is the median household income in Kingman, Indiana?

The typical household in Kingman, Indiana earns about $38,393 a year. Half of households make more than that, and half make less.

Is Kingman, Indiana expensive?

In Kingman, Indiana, the median home is worth about $72,900, and the typical rent is about $520 a month.

How educated are people in Kingman, Indiana?

About 4.4% of adults age 25 and over in Kingman, Indiana hold a bachelor's degree or higher.

What is the poverty rate in Kingman, Indiana?

About 20.9% of people in Kingman, Indiana live below the federal poverty line.

Has Kingman, Indiana grown since 1990?

Yes, Kingman, Indiana has shrunk since 1990. The population has lost about 58 residents, a change of about -10 percent over that period.

Keep going

Explore from here

Up the hierarchy
Indiana
Rankings
Highest income citiesFastest growing citiesMost educated cities
Compare
Compare Kingman with another place

DATA: US CENSUS BUREAU ACS 5-YEAR + DECENNIAL CENSUS · UPDATED 2024

How we source and harmonize this data →