CensusEasy
CITY

Markleeville

California · 110 residents · 6.531 sq mi
Time machine
COMPARE TO
Part of the Gardnerville Ranchos micropolitan area
Compare
The short version

Population has fallen 44% since 2000, a loss of 87 residents. Median home value has more than tripled since 2000, reaching $583,300. With a median age of 57.9, the population is older than the US median of 38.9.

At a glance
Older
median age 57.9
US median: 38.9
Average education
35% hold a bachelor's degree
US average: 36%
Less affordable
home values up 94%, inflation adjusted
US median home: $376,019
Section 01

Population & growth

Total population
110
−44%since 2000
from 197 in 2000
2000 – 2024
Population density
17 / sq mi
−44%since 2000
from 30 / sq mi in 2000
US average: 281
Median age
57.9
+30%since 2000
from 44.6 in 2000
US average: 38.9
Population, 2000 – 2024
931451972483002000201020202024Markleeville
2024110
2000201020202024
Section 02

Income & economy

Per capita income
$29,865
−27%since 2000
from $40,774 in 2000
US average: $44,673
Households earning $100K+
39.5%
−28.2 ptssince 2009
from 67.7% in 2009
US average: 53.3%
Poverty rate
6.4%
−8.9 ptssince 2000
from 15.3% in 2000
US average: 12.5%
Income inequality (Gini)
0.424
+57%since 2010
from 0.270 in 2010
US average: 0.476
Workforce by industry, 2024
Retail trade22.5%
US avg: 9.9%
Finance & insurance15%
US avg: 5.9%
Education & health services15%
US avg: 0.9%
Arts, entertainment, food10%
US avg: 1.9%
Agriculture, forestry, fishing0%
US avg: 1.6%
Construction0%
US avg: 1.2%
Manufacturing0%
US avg: 0.4%
Wholesale trade0%
US avg: 6.9%
Transportation & warehousing0%
US avg: 2.2%
Information0%
US avg: 10.8%
Professional, scientific, technical0%
US avg: 5.1%
Other services0%
US avg: 6.7%
Public administration0%
US avg: 4.8%
BARS: THIS PLACE · TICKS: US AVERAGE
Section 03

Housing

Median home value
$583,300
+94%inflation adjusted, since 2000
from $165,400 in 2000
US average: $376,019
2000 – 2024
Owner-occupied
79.1%
+10.6 ptssince 2000
from 68.5% in 2000
20.9% rent
Vacancy rate
66.9%
+6.3 ptssince 2009
from 60.6% in 2009
US average: 10.0%
Owner cost-burdened
70.6%
+44.4 ptssince 2009
from 26.2% in 2009
US average: 22.9%
Renter cost-burdened
0.0%
−13.0 ptssince 2009
from 13.0% in 2009
US average: 47.4%
RELATED:See current rent listings in Markleeville on RentDataNow
Section 04

Race & ethnicity

2000
White, non-Hispanic95.9%(189)
Black0%(0)
Hispanic / Latino1.5%(3)
Asian0%(0)
Other0%
Diversity Score3.8%(8)
2024
White, non-Hispanic46.4%(51)
Black0%(0)
Hispanic / Latino26.4%(29)
Asian27.3%(30)
Other0%(0)
Diversity Score80.1%(88)
Diversity Score
80
+1984%since 2000
from 4 in 2000
2000 – 2024
Section 05

Education

Bachelor's degree or higher
35.2%
+4.3 ptssince 2000
from 30.9% in 2000
US average: 35.6%
High school or higher
100.0%
+7.2 ptssince 2000
from 92.8% in 2000
US average: 89.6%
Graduate degree
10.2%
+1.7 ptssince 2000
from 8.6% in 2000
US average: 14.0%
Section 06

Commute & transportation

Average commute
28.9 min
+53%since 2000
from 18.9 min in 2000
US average: 26.5
Drive alone to work
80.0%
+12.3 ptssince 2009
from 67.7% in 2009
US average: 68.9%
Carpooled to work
0.0%
−6.2 ptssince 2009
from 6.2% in 2009
US average: 8.5%
Public transit
0.0%
Unchangedsince 2009
from 0.0% in 2009
US average: 3.2%
Worked from home
20.0%
+4.6 ptssince 2009
from 15.4% in 2009
US average: 15.0%
Walked to work
0.0%
−10.8 ptssince 2009
from 10.8% in 2009
US average: 2.4%
Biked to work
0.0%
Unchangedsince 2009
from 0.0% in 2009
US average: 0.4%
No vehicle available
0.0%
Unchangedsince 2009
from 0.0% in 2009
US average: 8.3%
Section 07

Work & employment

Unemployment rate
0.0%
Unchangedsince 2011
from 0.0% in 2011
US average: 5.2%
Labor force participation
45.5%
−31.7 ptssince 2011
from 77.1% in 2011
US average: 63.5%
Self-employed
10.0%
−46.5 ptssince 2009
from 56.5% in 2009
US average: 13.1%
Management & professional
52.5%
−18.5 ptssince 2009
from 71.0% in 2009
US average: 42.5%
Section 08

People & community

Male
60.0%
+11.9 ptssince 2009
from 48.1% in 2009
Female
40.0%
−11.9 ptssince 2009
from 51.9% in 2009
Foreign born
27.3%
+24.1 ptssince 2009
from 3.1% in 2009
US average: 14.1%
Veterans
4.5%
−56.8 ptssince 2009
from 61.3% in 2009
US average: 6.2%
With a disability
28.2%
+24.0 ptssince 2012
from 4.2% in 2012
US average: 13.3%
Uninsured
0.0%
−72.4 ptssince 2013
from 72.4% in 2013
US average: 8.4%
Broadband at home
100.0%
+10.8 ptssince 2017
from 89.2% in 2017
US average: 91.0%
English only at home
69.7%
−29.0 ptssince 2016
from 98.7% in 2016
US average: 77.7%
Spanish at home
0.0%
−1.3 ptssince 2016
from 1.3% in 2016
US average: 13.6%
Drill deeper

Places similar to Markleeville

Hope
Pop 108
Bellville
Pop 125
Juliette
Pop 128
Manor
Pop 136
Places similar to Markleeville
Head to head

Compare Markleeville to nearby cities

MARKLEEVILLE VS
Gardnerville Ranchos
Income$87,785
Home value$486,000−17%
Population12,114+10913%
SEE FULL COMPARISON →
MARKLEEVILLE VS
South Lake Tahoe
Income$82,002
Home value$682,400+17%
Population21,115+19095%
SEE FULL COMPARISON →
MARKLEEVILLE VS
Carson
Income$72,355
Home value$453,000−22%
Population58,571+53146%
SEE FULL COMPARISON →
MARKLEEVILLE VS
Incline
Income$167,069
Home value$1,454,600+149%
Population9,272+8329%
SEE FULL COMPARISON →
Frequently asked

How many people live in Markleeville, California?

Markleeville, California has about 110 residents according to the 2024 American Community Survey.

Is Markleeville, California expensive?

In Markleeville, California, the median home is worth about $583,300.

How educated are people in Markleeville, California?

About 35.2% of adults age 25 and over in Markleeville, California hold a bachelor's degree or higher.

What is the poverty rate in Markleeville, California?

About 6.4% of people in Markleeville, California live below the federal poverty line.

Keep going

Explore from here

Up the hierarchy
California
Rankings
Highest income citiesFastest growing citiesMost educated cities
Compare
Compare Markleeville with another place

DATA: US CENSUS BUREAU ACS 5-YEAR + DECENNIAL CENSUS · UPDATED 2024

How we source and harmonize this data →