RANKING · 2024 ACS · 97 SHOWN OF 97

Worst broadband access, Utah cities

Utah cities with the lowest broadband subscription rates, where federal infrastructure investment is being targeted (2024 ACS). This list covers the 97 cities in Utah that qualify, ranked against each other statewide. The median across all 97 is 94.5%.

Flip the list · Best broadband access, US cities →

UtahAll statesPop > 5KAll rankings

SAME RANKING BYCounties States Metros ZIP codes

RANKPLACESTATEPOPBROADBAND INTERNET SUBSCRIPTIONVS –

01Ephraim, UTUT6,39379.3%–

02Moab, UTUT5,20681.3%–

03Price, UTUT8,36883.6%–

04Provo, UTUT114,52784.6%–

05Vineyard, UTUT16,09286.5%–

06Clearfield, UTUT35,14487.8%–

07Hyrum, UTUT11,13288.0%–

08Fruit Heights, UTUT5,95289.0%–

09South Salt Lake, UTUT26,93489.4%–

10Logan, UTUT55,57689.7%–

11Enoch, UTUT8,84790.2%–

12Payson, UTUT24,63090.6%–

13Vernal, UTUT10,67190.6%–

14Roosevelt, UTUT7,03290.7%–

15Salt Lake City, UTUT218,42891.0%–

16Nephi, UTUT7,48891.5%–

17St. George, UTUT108,71391.8%–

18Cedar City, UTUT41,87192.0%–

19Kanab, UTUT5,33292.0%–

20Brigham City, UTUT20,63392.2%–

21West Bountiful, UTUT5,93192.3%–

22Orem, UTUT95,21492.5%–

23White City metro, UTUT5,14692.5%–

24Hurricane, UTUT25,74592.6%–

25Richfield, UTUT8,47892.7%–

26West Haven, UTUT25,62793.1%–

27Layton, UTUT85,30893.1%–

28Millcreek, UTUT63,92693.2%–

29Springville, UTUT35,67093.2%–

30Woods Cross, UTUT11,42993.4%–

31Pleasant Grove, UTUT37,77393.5%–

32Tremonton, UTUT12,93493.5%–

33Sandy, UTUT92,38693.6%–

34Midvale, UTUT36,09993.7%–

35Park City, UTUT8,58793.7%–

36Ogden, UTUT89,51093.8%–

37Perry, UTUT6,22693.8%–

38Ivins, UTUT11,54693.9%–

39Washington Terrace, UTUT9,07593.9%–

40Murray, UTUT53,29793.9%–

41Tooele, UTUT42,27094.0%–

42Lindon, UTUT12,01594.1%–

43Heber, UTUT19,65194.2%–

44Bountiful, UTUT44,98894.3%–

45West Valley City, UTUT137,49194.3%–

46Roy, UTUT38,79494.4%–

47Centerville, UTUT16,48094.5%–

48Riverton, UTUT47,39594.5%–

49Taylorsville, UTUT57,48494.5%–

50Draper, UTUT50,65294.7%–

51South Ogden, UTUT17,71094.7%–

52Riverdale, UTUT9,20694.7%–

53Cottonwood Heights, UTUT32,26594.8%–

54American Fork, UTUT41,02094.9%–

55North Salt Lake, UTUT23,58894.9%–

56North Logan, UTUT11,60895.1%–

57South Jordan, UTUT87,61495.2%–

58Grantsville, UTUT16,47295.3%–

59Sunset, UTUT5,54995.4%–

60Holladay, UTUT31,16295.5%–

61Kearns metro, UTUT35,40495.5%–

62Harrisville, UTUT7,15495.7%–

63Magna metro, UTUT35,40195.8%–

64Providence, UTUT9,53995.8%–

65North Ogden, UTUT21,68995.9%–

66South Weber, UTUT8,21896.0%–

67Salem, UTUT12,23496.1%–

68Washington, UTUT37,10796.1%–

69West Jordan, UTUT116,81296.1%–

70Mapleton, UTUT16,27596.4%–

71Pleasant View, UTUT11,42396.4%–

72Clinton, UTUT23,79796.7%–

73Herriman, UTUT63,28296.8%–

74Lehi, UTUT95,31397.0%–

75Spanish Fork, UTUT48,83797.0%–

76Alpine, UTUT10,44497.1%–

77Farr West, UTUT8,16397.2%–

78Smithfield, UTUT15,15397.3%–

79Kaysville, UTUT33,30797.3%–

80Farmington, UTUT26,26697.4%–

81Bluffdale, UTUT19,50697.5%–

82Syracuse, UTUT39,90997.5%–

83Snyderville, UTUT5,94897.6%–

84Midway, UTUT6,01197.7%–

85Plain City, UTUT9,25697.7%–

86West Point, UTUT13,05897.7%–

87Highland, UTUT21,57197.9%–

88Santaquin, UTUT18,98998.0%–

89Cedar Hills, UTUT9,75598.0%–

90Saratoga Springs, UTUT61,39798.2%–

91Summit Park, UTUT8,53798.3%–

92Eagle Mountain, UTUT66,55798.4%–

93Hyde Park, UTUT5,78698.4%–

94Santa Clara, UTUT8,72298.5%–

95Hooper, UTUT9,74198.7%–

96Nibley, UTUT8,97598.9%–

97Stansbury Park, UTUT11,24299.3%–

SHOWING 1–97 OF 97

Download CSV (full list, 97 rows)

UPDATED 2026-09-11 · DATA: US CENSUS BUREAU ACS 5-YEAR ESTIMATES