RANKING · 2010 CENSUS · 97 SHOWN OF 97

Most rent-burdened, Utah cities · 2010

Utah cities ranked by the share of renter households paying 30% or more of income on gross rent (2023 ACS). This list covers the 97 cities in Utah that qualify, ranked against each other statewide.

UtahAll statesPop > 5KAll rankings

SAME RANKING BYCounties States Metros ZIP codes

YEAR2010 2024

RANKPLACESTATEPOPRENT-BURDENED HOUSEHOLDSVS 2000

01Vineyard, UTUT16,09276.5%–

02Cedar Hills, UTUT9,75571.0%–

03Washington, UTUT37,10765.0%–

04Stansbury Park, UTUT11,24262.8%–

05Highland, UTUT21,57159.8%–

06Perry, UTUT6,22658.9%–

07West Bountiful, UTUT5,93158.1%–

08Sunset, UTUT5,54956.6%–

09Herriman, UTUT63,28253.0%–

10Santaquin, UTUT18,98952.9%–

11West Valley City, UTUT137,49152.8%–

12Park City, UTUT8,58752.8%–

13Magna metro, UTUT35,40151.4%–

14Ivins, UTUT11,54651.3%–

15Taylorsville, UTUT57,48451.1%–

16Provo, UTUT114,52751.0%–

17Lindon, UTUT12,01549.3%–

18Roosevelt, UTUT7,03248.9%–

19Bluffdale, UTUT19,50648.8%–

20Kearns metro, UTUT35,40447.9%–

21Price, UTUT8,36846.8%–

22Ephraim, UTUT6,39346.5%–

23St. George, UTUT108,71345.9%–

24Logan, UTUT55,57645.8%–

25South Salt Lake, UTUT26,93445.8%–

26West Jordan, UTUT116,81245.6%–

27West Haven, UTUT25,62745.3%–

28North Logan, UTUT11,60845.3%–

29Enoch, UTUT8,84745.2%–

30Hurricane, UTUT25,74545.2%–

31Orem, UTUT95,21444.7%–

32Cedar City, UTUT41,87144.7%–

33Hyrum, UTUT11,13244.6%–

34Salt Lake City, UTUT218,42844.5%–

35Providence, UTUT9,53944.4%–

36Clearfield, UTUT35,14444.0%–

37Midvale, UTUT36,09943.9%–

38Heber, UTUT19,65143.2%–

39Pleasant View, UTUT11,42343.1%–

40North Salt Lake, UTUT23,58842.8%–

41Vernal, UTUT10,67142.8%–

42Tooele, UTUT42,27042.7%–

43Draper, UTUT50,65242.3%–

44Clinton, UTUT23,79742.3%–

45Roy, UTUT38,79442.2%–

46Ogden, UTUT89,51042.0%–

47Murray, UTUT53,29741.8%–

48Sandy, UTUT92,38641.7%–

49Riverton, UTUT47,39541.7%–

50Saratoga Springs, UTUT61,39741.4%–

51Millcreek, UTUT63,92641.2%–

52Layton, UTUT85,30841.0%–

53Lehi, UTUT95,31340.7%–

54South Jordan, UTUT87,61439.6%–

55Eagle Mountain, UTUT66,55739.3%–

56West Point, UTUT13,05839.1%–

57Pleasant Grove, UTUT37,77338.7%–

58Moab, UTUT5,20638.6%–

59Spanish Fork, UTUT48,83738.0%–

60Midway, UTUT6,01138.0%–

61North Ogden, UTUT21,68937.8%–

62American Fork, UTUT41,02037.6%–

63Farmington, UTUT26,26637.4%–

64Alpine, UTUT10,44436.9%–

65Richfield, UTUT8,47836.3%–

66Cottonwood Heights, UTUT32,26535.8%–

67Springville, UTUT35,67035.6%–

68Bountiful, UTUT44,98834.8%–

69White City metro, UTUT5,14634.3%–

70Payson, UTUT24,63034.1%–

71Holladay, UTUT31,16234.0%–

72Grantsville, UTUT16,47233.7%–

73Kanab, UTUT5,33233.7%–

74Kaysville, UTUT33,30733.1%–

75Nephi, UTUT7,48833.1%–

76Washington Terrace, UTUT9,07533.1%–

77South Ogden, UTUT17,71032.7%–

78Fruit Heights, UTUT5,95232.1%–

79Mapleton, UTUT16,27530.3%–

80Syracuse, UTUT39,90930.2%–

81Smithfield, UTUT15,15329.8%–

82Brigham City, UTUT20,63328.2%–

83Tremonton, UTUT12,93428.0%–

84Woods Cross, UTUT11,42927.9%–

85Snyderville, UTUT5,94826.8%–

86Santa Clara, UTUT8,72226.7%–

87South Weber, UTUT8,21825.5%–

88Hooper, UTUT9,74124.5%–

89Salem, UTUT12,23424.1%–

90Summit Park, UTUT8,53723.7%–

91Riverdale, UTUT9,20620.9%–

92Plain City, UTUT9,25619.0%–

93Harrisville, UTUT7,15419.0%–

94Farr West, UTUT8,16318.3%–

95Nibley, UTUT8,97513.6%–

96Centerville, UTUT16,48012.9%–

97Hyde Park, UTUT5,78610.9%–

SHOWING 1–97 OF 97

Download CSV (full list, 97 rows)

UPDATED 2026-06-02 · DATA: US CENSUS BUREAU ACS 5-YEAR ESTIMATES