CensusEasy
RANKING · 2010 CENSUS · 97 SHOWN OF 97

Most rent-burdened, Utah cities · 2010

Utah cities ranked by the share of renter households paying 30% or more of income on gross rent (2010 ACS). This list covers the 97 cities in Utah that qualify, ranked against each other statewide. The median across all 97 is 41.7%.

Most rent-burdened by state
RANKPLACESTATEPOPRENT-BURDENED HOUSEHOLDSVS –
01Vineyard, UTUT16,09276.5%–
02Cedar Hills, UTUT9,75571.0%–
03Washington, UTUT37,10765.0%–
04Stansbury Park, UTUT11,24262.8%–
05Highland, UTUT21,57159.8%–
06Perry, UTUT6,22658.9%–
07West Bountiful, UTUT5,93158.1%–
08Sunset, UTUT5,54956.6%–
09Herriman, UTUT63,28253.0%–
10Santaquin, UTUT18,98952.9%–
11West Valley City, UTUT137,49152.8%–
12Park City, UTUT8,58752.8%–
13Magna metro, UTUT35,40151.4%–
14Ivins, UTUT11,54651.3%–
15Taylorsville, UTUT57,48451.1%–
16Provo, UTUT114,52751.0%–
17Lindon, UTUT12,01549.3%–
18Roosevelt, UTUT7,03248.9%–
19Bluffdale, UTUT19,50648.8%–
20Kearns metro, UTUT35,40447.9%–
21Price, UTUT8,36846.8%–
22Ephraim, UTUT6,39346.5%–
23St. George, UTUT108,71345.9%–
24Logan, UTUT55,57645.8%–
25South Salt Lake, UTUT26,93445.8%–
26West Jordan, UTUT116,81245.6%–
27West Haven, UTUT25,62745.3%–
28North Logan, UTUT11,60845.3%–
29Enoch, UTUT8,84745.2%–
30Hurricane, UTUT25,74545.2%–
31Orem, UTUT95,21444.7%–
32Cedar City, UTUT41,87144.7%–
33Hyrum, UTUT11,13244.6%–
34Salt Lake City, UTUT218,42844.5%–
35Providence, UTUT9,53944.4%–
36Clearfield, UTUT35,14444.0%–
37Midvale, UTUT36,09943.9%–
38Heber, UTUT19,65143.2%–
39Pleasant View, UTUT11,42343.1%–
40North Salt Lake, UTUT23,58842.8%–
41Vernal, UTUT10,67142.8%–
42Tooele, UTUT42,27042.7%–
43Draper, UTUT50,65242.3%–
44Clinton, UTUT23,79742.3%–
45Roy, UTUT38,79442.2%–
46Ogden, UTUT89,51042.0%–
47Murray, UTUT53,29741.8%–
48Sandy, UTUT92,38641.7%–
49Riverton, UTUT47,39541.7%–
50Saratoga Springs, UTUT61,39741.4%–
51Millcreek, UTUT63,92641.2%–
52Layton, UTUT85,30841.0%–
53Lehi, UTUT95,31340.7%–
54South Jordan, UTUT87,61439.6%–
55Eagle Mountain, UTUT66,55739.3%–
56West Point, UTUT13,05839.1%–
57Pleasant Grove, UTUT37,77338.7%–
58Moab, UTUT5,20638.6%–
59Spanish Fork, UTUT48,83738.0%–
60Midway, UTUT6,01138.0%–
61North Ogden, UTUT21,68937.8%–
62American Fork, UTUT41,02037.6%–
63Farmington, UTUT26,26637.4%–
64Alpine, UTUT10,44436.9%–
65Richfield, UTUT8,47836.3%–
66Cottonwood Heights, UTUT32,26535.8%–
67Springville, UTUT35,67035.6%–
68Bountiful, UTUT44,98834.8%–
69White City metro, UTUT5,14634.3%–
70Payson, UTUT24,63034.1%–
71Holladay, UTUT31,16234.0%–
72Grantsville, UTUT16,47233.7%–
73Kanab, UTUT5,33233.7%–
74Kaysville, UTUT33,30733.1%–
75Nephi, UTUT7,48833.1%–
76Washington Terrace, UTUT9,07533.1%–
77South Ogden, UTUT17,71032.7%–
78Fruit Heights, UTUT5,95232.1%–
79Mapleton, UTUT16,27530.3%–
80Syracuse, UTUT39,90930.2%–
81Smithfield, UTUT15,15329.8%–
82Brigham City, UTUT20,63328.2%–
83Tremonton, UTUT12,93428.0%–
84Woods Cross, UTUT11,42927.9%–
85Snyderville, UTUT5,94826.8%–
86Santa Clara, UTUT8,72226.7%–
87South Weber, UTUT8,21825.5%–
88Hooper, UTUT9,74124.5%–
89Salem, UTUT12,23424.1%–
90Summit Park, UTUT8,53723.7%–
91Riverdale, UTUT9,20620.9%–
92Plain City, UTUT9,25619.0%–
93Harrisville, UTUT7,15419.0%–
94Farr West, UTUT8,16318.3%–
95Nibley, UTUT8,97513.6%–
96Centerville, UTUT16,48012.9%–
97Hyde Park, UTUT5,78610.9%–
SHOWING 1–97 OF 97

UPDATED 2026-09-11 · DATA: US CENSUS BUREAU DECENNIAL CENSUS