COMPARING TWO PLACES
Chassell vs Rhinelander
PLACE A
Chassell, Michigan
VS
PLACE B
Rhinelander, Wisconsin
Chassell is 89% smaller than Rhinelander. Chassell earns more, with a median household income $2,727 higher.
CHASSELLRHINELANDERDIFFERENCE
Total population8998,242−89% vs Rhinelander
Population density249979−730
Population growth–6.2%–
Median age49.438.2+11.2
Male49.4%49.1%+0.3 pts
Female50.6%50.9%−0.3 pts
Foreign-born1.4%1.0%+0.4 pts
White, non-Hispanic91.8%92.7%−0.9 pts
Black1.4%1.1%+0.4 pts
Hispanic / Latino3.7%1.9%+1.8 pts
Asian1.4%0.0%+1.4 pts
Other1.7%4.3%−2.6 pts
Median household income$54,148$51,421+$2,727
Per capita income$44,805$29,065+$15,740
Poverty rate17.0%12.8%+4.2 pts
Income inequality (Gini)0.5220.430+0.1
Bachelor's degree or higher42.8%22.4%+20.3 pts
Graduate degree21.1%9.3%+11.8 pts
Unemployment rate1.5%1.0%+0.5 pts
Labor force participation55.8%57.2%−1.4 pts
Median home value$167,600$125,700+$41,900
Median gross rent$711$804−$93
Owner-occupied84.4%65.5%+18.8 pts
Housing vacancy rate23.6%17.9%+5.7 pts
Rent-burdened households58.8%34.7%+24.1 pts
Average commute17.715.9+1.8
Worked from home11.5%7.7%+3.8 pts
Public transit to work2.3%0.0%+2.3 pts
Uninsured11.1%4.9%+6.2 pts
Population, 2020 – 2024