Census tract rankings · the United States
Highest-poverty census tracts
Largest share of residents under the federal poverty line. Group-quarters tracts (universities, prisons) get a population floor to avoid skewing the list.
Flip the list · Lowest-poverty census tracts →Filter by state
All USAlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming
| Rank | Tract | County | high poverty |
|---|---|---|---|
| #301 | Tract 9205.01 | Anson, NC | 61.4% |
| #302 | Tract 4008 | Cook, IL | 61.4% |
| #303 | Tract 16 | Calcasieu Parish, LA | 61.4% |
| #304 | Tract 220 | Bronx, NY | 61.4% |
| #305 | Tract 5225 | Wayne, MI | 61.4% |
| #306 | Tract 35.01 | Jefferson, KY | 61.4% |
| #307 | Tract 26 | Winnebago, IL | 61.3% |
| #308 | Tract 11.01 | Benton, OR | 61.2% |
| #309 | Tract 109.02 | San Luis Obispo, CA | 61.2% |
| #310 | Tract 2 | Calcasieu Parish, LA | 61.2% |
| #311 | Tract 6018 | Camden, NJ | 61.2% |
| #312 | Tract 8140 | Mahoning, OH | 61.2% |
| #313 | Tract 7316.02 | Worcester, MA | 61.1% |
| #314 | Tract 15.04 | Washoe, NV | 61.1% |
| #315 | Tract 210.01 | Hidalgo, TX | 61.1% |
| #316 | Tract 55 | Monroe, NY | 61.1% |
| #317 | Tract 253 | Caddo Parish, LA | 61.1% |
| #318 | Tract 3 | Muscogee, GA | 61.1% |
| #319 | Tract 15 | Ouachita Parish, LA | 61.1% |
| #320 | Tract 28 | Orleans Parish, LA | 61.0% |
| #321 | Tract 238.02 | Caddo Parish, LA | 60.9% |
| #322 | Tract 8011.01 | Hampden, MA | 60.9% |
| #323 | Tract 19 | Shelby, TN | 60.9% |
| #324 | Tract 5401.01 | Cook, IL | 60.9% |
| #325 | Tract 8 | Lycoming, PA | 60.8% |
| #326 | Tract 1048.01 | Hennepin, MN | 60.8% |
| #327 | Tract 10.02 | Brazos, TX | 60.8% |
| #328 | Tract 5053 | Summit, OH | 60.8% |
| #329 | Tract 22 | Orleans Parish, LA | 60.8% |
| #330 | Tract 1702 | Baltimore city, MD | 60.8% |
| #331 | Tract 1208.02 | Cuyahoga, OH | 60.7% |
| #332 | Tract 53.05 | King, WA | 60.7% |
| #333 | Tract 15 | Atlantic, NJ | 60.7% |
| #334 | Tract 11 | Saginaw, MI | 60.6% |
| #335 | Tract 5352 | Wayne, MI | 60.6% |
| #336 | Tract 119 | Lake, IN | 60.6% |
| #337 | Tract 18 | Jefferson, KY | 60.6% |
| #338 | Tract 117.01 | Richland, SC | 60.5% |
| #339 | Tract 3 | Vigo, IN | 60.5% |
| #340 | Tract 147.01 | Bronx, NY | 60.4% |
| #341 | Tract 23 | Bronx, NY | 60.3% |
| #342 | Tract 43 | Norfolk city, VA | 60.3% |
| #343 | Tract 29.36 | Santa Barbara, CA | 60.2% |
| #344 | Tract 15 | Nueces, TX | 60.2% |
| #345 | Tract 108.24 | Hillsborough, FL | 60.1% |
| #346 | Tract 973 | Lorain, OH | 60.1% |
| #347 | Tract 352 | Kings, NY | 60.1% |
| #348 | Tract 4 | Washington, MS | 60.1% |
| #349 | Tract 5598 | Wayne, MI | 60.1% |
| #350 | Tract 1101 | St. Louis city, MO | 60.1% |
| #351 | Tract 5 | Whitman, WA | 60.0% |
| #352 | Tract 1208.01 | Cuyahoga, OH | 60.0% |
| #353 | Tract 31 | Pulaski, AR | 59.9% |
| #354 | Tract 406.06 | Lee, AL | 59.9% |
| #355 | Tract 140.13 | Hillsborough, FL | 59.9% |
| #356 | Tract 121.08 | Rockland, NY | 59.9% |
| #357 | Tract 9400.10 | Navajo, AZ | 59.8% |
| #358 | Tract 1238 | Cuyahoga, OH | 59.8% |
| #359 | Tract 6.08 | Travis, TX | 59.8% |
| #360 | Tract 9.02 | Fresno, CA | 59.8% |
| #361 | Tract 71.04 | Erie, NY | 59.8% |
| #362 | Tract 9206.01 | Watauga, NC | 59.8% |
| #363 | Tract 9 | Lafayette Parish, LA | 59.7% |
| #364 | Tract 3128 | Harris, TX | 59.7% |
| #365 | Tract 6.06 | Travis, TX | 59.7% |
| #366 | Tract 68 | Hamilton, OH | 59.7% |
| #367 | Tract 22 | Berrien, MI | 59.6% |
| #368 | Tract 4003 | Washtenaw, MI | 59.5% |
| #369 | Tract 8012 | Hampden, MA | 59.5% |
| #370 | Tract 7.15 | Bernalillo, NM | 59.4% |
| #371 | Tract 5189 | Wayne, MI | 59.3% |
| #372 | Tract 3 | Etowah, AL | 59.3% |
| #373 | Tract 9 | Madison, TN | 59.3% |
| #374 | Tract 13.01 | Kern, CA | 59.3% |
| #375 | Tract 50 | Jefferson, KY | 59.2% |
| #376 | Tract 4227 | Alameda, CA | 59.2% |
| #377 | Tract 6 | Lauderdale, MS | 59.2% |
| #378 | Tract 31 | Richland, OH | 59.2% |
| #379 | Tract 56.22 | Mecklenburg, NC | 59.2% |
| #380 | Tract 38.01 | Lane, OR | 59.1% |
| #381 | Tract 3.01 | Douglas, KS | 59.1% |
| #382 | Tract 30 | Muscogee, GA | 59.1% |
| #383 | Tract 7 | Florence, SC | 59.1% |
| #384 | Tract 129 | Rapides Parish, LA | 59.1% |
| #385 | Tract 6711 | Cook, IL | 59.1% |
| #386 | Tract 28 | Kent, MI | 59.1% |
| #387 | Tract 7 | Etowah, AL | 59.1% |
| #388 | Tract 11.21 | Franklin, OH | 59.0% |
| #389 | Tract 112.03 | Miami-Dade, FL | 59.0% |
| #390 | Tract 806.01 | Suffolk, MA | 59.0% |
| #391 | Tract 9609 | Lincoln Parish, LA | 59.0% |
| #392 | Tract 105.03 | Payne, OK | 58.9% |
| #393 | Tract 206 | Lake, IN | 58.9% |
| #394 | Tract 7246 | Galveston, TX | 58.9% |
| #395 | Tract 59.01 | Jefferson, KY | 58.9% |
| #396 | Tract 33 | Hamilton, OH | 58.9% |
| #397 | Tract 103 | Payne, OK | 58.8% |
| #398 | Tract 5.02 | Butte, CA | 58.8% |
| #399 | Tract 105 | Bowie, TX | 58.8% |
| #400 | Tract 11 | Ouachita Parish, LA | 58.8% |
More tract rankings
Densest census tracts
SEE LIST →
Least-dense inhabited census tracts
SEE LIST →
Most populous census tracts
SEE LIST →
Highest-income census tracts
SEE LIST →
Lowest-income census tracts
SEE LIST →
Highest per-capita income census tracts
SEE LIST →
Highest median home values
SEE LIST →
Lowest median home values
SEE LIST →
Highest median rent
SEE LIST →
Lowest median rent
SEE LIST →
Most-educated census tracts
SEE LIST →
Least-educated census tracts
SEE LIST →