COMPARING TWO PLACES
Warner vs Aberdeen
PLACE A
Warner, Oklahoma
VS
PLACE B
Aberdeen, South Dakota
Warner is 94% smaller than Aberdeen. Aberdeen earns more, with a median household income $8,926 higher. Aberdeen has grown faster since 2000 (9% vs -3%).
WARNERABERDEENDIFFERENCE
Total population1,58727,961−94% vs Aberdeen
Population density8581,693−835
Population growth-2.9%9.2%−12.1 pts
Median age23.436.4−13.0
Male51.5%48.8%+2.7 pts
Female48.5%51.2%−2.7 pts
Foreign-born1.7%5.3%−3.6 pts
White, non-Hispanic55.0%81.5%−26.5 pts
Black1.1%1.8%−0.6 pts
Hispanic / Latino5.0%5.5%−0.6 pts
Asian0.0%3.4%−3.4 pts
Other38.9%7.9%+31.1 pts
Median household income$55,479$64,405−$8,926
Per capita income$19,020$38,258−$19,238
Poverty rate19.8%13.8%+6.0 pts
Income inequality (Gini)0.3530.451−0.1
Bachelor's degree or higher13.7%35.0%−21.2 pts
Graduate degree5.5%10.7%−5.2 pts
Unemployment rate5.8%3.7%+2.1 pts
Labor force participation57.1%68.3%−11.2 pts
Median home value$108,600$217,300−$108,700
Median gross rent$808$762+$46
Owner-occupied53.8%61.7%−7.9 pts
Housing vacancy rate16.9%8.7%+8.2 pts
Rent-burdened households23.9%44.4%−20.5 pts
Average commute24.311.9+12.4
Worked from home4.5%5.4%−0.8 pts
Public transit to work0.0%0.7%−0.7 pts
Uninsured28.1%5.5%+22.6 pts
Population, 1990 – 2025