COMPARING TWO PLACES
Wanda vs New Ulm
PLACE A
Wanda, Minnesota
VS
PLACE B
New Ulm, Texas
Wanda is 59% smaller than New Ulm. Wanda earns more, with a median household income $22,135 higher.
WANDANEW ULMDIFFERENCE
Total population75185−59% vs New Ulm
Population density29035+255
Population growth-14.3%––
Median age53.860.8−7.0
Male57.7%38.4%+19.3 pts
Female42.3%61.6%−19.3 pts
Foreign-born0.0%2.2%−2.2 pts
White, non-Hispanic99.0%97.8%+1.2 pts
Black0.0%0.0%Even
Hispanic / Latino0.0%2.2%−2.2 pts
Asian0.0%0.0%Even
Other1.0%0.0%+1.0 pts
Median household income$82,083$59,948+$22,135
Per capita income$48,988$37,211+$11,777
Poverty rate14.4%12.4%+2.1 pts
Income inequality (Gini)0.4010.282+0.1
Bachelor's degree or higher34.8%5.7%+29.1 pts
Graduate degree15.2%0.0%+15.2 pts
Unemployment rate0.0%14.3%−14.3 pts
Labor force participation67.3%49.2%+18.2 pts
Median home value$164,600$248,500−$83,900
Median gross rent$325––
Owner-occupied76.3%56.9%+19.4 pts
Housing vacancy rate14.5%47.1%−32.6 pts
Rent-burdened households0.0%0.0%Even
Average commute17.039.5−22.5
Worked from home13.6%0.0%+13.6 pts
Public transit to work1.5%0.0%+1.5 pts
Uninsured6.7%0.0%+6.7 pts
Population, 2020 – 2024