COMPARING TWO PLACES
Manchester vs Rutland
PLACE A
Manchester, Oklahoma
VS
PLACE B
Rutland, Vermont
Manchester is 99% smaller than Rutland. Manchester earns more, with a median household income $32,771 higher. Rutland has grown faster since 2000 (-4% vs -13%).
MANCHESTERRUTLANDDIFFERENCE
Total population9215,363−99% vs Rutland
Population density3802,034−1,654
Population growth-12.6%-4.2%−8.5 pts
Median age41.949.0−7.1
Male59.4%50.8%+8.7 pts
Female40.6%49.2%−8.7 pts
Foreign-born0.7%2.1%−1.4 pts
White, non-Hispanic98.6%92.6%+6.0 pts
Black0.0%0.7%−0.7 pts
Hispanic / Latino0.0%3.7%−3.7 pts
Asian0.7%0.7%Even
Other0.7%2.4%−1.7 pts
Median household income$90,446$57,675+$32,771
Per capita income$36,412$37,528−$1,116
Poverty rate1.4%15.3%−13.9 pts
Income inequality (Gini)0.3040.452−0.1
Bachelor's degree or higher22.6%33.4%−10.7 pts
Graduate degree12.3%13.5%−1.3 pts
Unemployment rate0.0%4.4%−4.4 pts
Labor force participation71.3%56.6%+14.7 pts
Median home value$56,000$185,500−$129,500
Median gross rent$175$995−$820
Owner-occupied91.8%54.9%+36.9 pts
Housing vacancy rate23.8%13.0%+10.8 pts
Rent-burdened households0.0%50.0%−50.0 pts
Average commute24.416.0+8.3
Worked from home0.0%8.1%−8.1 pts
Public transit to work0.0%0.6%−0.6 pts
Uninsured1.4%3.7%−2.3 pts
Population, 1990 – 2025