COMPARING TWO PLACES
Luke vs Cumberland
PLACE A
Luke, Maryland
VS
PLACE B
Cumberland, Wisconsin
Luke is 96% smaller than Cumberland. Luke earns more, with a median household income $31,771 higher. Luke has grown faster since 2000 (31% vs 5%).
LUKECUMBERLANDDIFFERENCE
Total population822,282−96% vs Cumberland
Population density308549−241
Population growth30.8%4.8%+26.0 pts
Median age44.539.3+5.2
Male59.6%48.7%+10.8 pts
Female40.4%51.3%−10.8 pts
Foreign-born0.0%0.4%−0.4 pts
White, non-Hispanic97.8%89.7%+8.0 pts
Black1.1%0.4%+0.7 pts
Hispanic / Latino1.1%0.2%+0.9 pts
Asian0.0%0.6%−0.6 pts
Other0.0%9.1%−9.1 pts
Median household income$81,250$49,479+$31,771
Per capita income$32,897$34,391−$1,494
Poverty rate2.2%37.1%−34.8 pts
Income inequality (Gini)0.3670.479−0.1
Bachelor's degree or higher11.5%31.3%−19.8 pts
Graduate degree1.6%9.4%−7.7 pts
Unemployment rate9.8%7.1%+2.7 pts
Labor force participation67.1%58.1%+9.0 pts
Median home value$51,000$181,100−$130,100
Median gross rent$638$943−$305
Owner-occupied88.6%62.2%+26.4 pts
Housing vacancy rate25.5%15.8%+9.7 pts
Rent-burdened households0.0%54.5%−54.5 pts
Average commute24.820.6+4.2
Worked from home0.0%3.5%−3.5 pts
Public transit to work0.0%0.4%−0.4 pts
Uninsured1.1%6.1%−5.0 pts
Population, 1990 – 2025