COMPARING TWO PLACES
Hurdsfield vs Bismarck
PLACE A
Hurdsfield, North Dakota
VS
PLACE B
Bismarck, Illinois
Hurdsfield is 90% smaller than Bismarck. Hurdsfield earns more, with a median household income $30,667 higher. Bismarck has grown faster since 2000 (1% vs -24%).
HURDSFIELDBISMARCKDIFFERENCE
Total population58577−90% vs Bismarck
Population density200777−577
Population growth-23.8%0.5%−24.3 pts
Median age33.541.8−8.3
Male48.6%46.5%+2.0 pts
Female51.4%53.5%−2.0 pts
Foreign-born0.0%0.0%Even
White, non-Hispanic91.4%91.9%−0.5 pts
Black0.0%0.0%Even
Hispanic / Latino8.6%5.5%+3.0 pts
Asian0.0%1.6%−1.6 pts
Other0.0%1.0%−1.0 pts
Median household income$110,250$79,583+$30,667
Per capita income$24,723$32,096−$7,373
Poverty rate0.0%9.9%−9.9 pts
Income inequality (Gini)0.1440.360−0.2
Bachelor's degree or higher23.8%21.7%+2.1 pts
Graduate degree0.0%10.4%−10.4 pts
Unemployment rate0.0%4.8%−4.8 pts
Labor force participation56.5%65.9%−9.4 pts
Median home value$72,500$114,500−$42,000
Median gross rent$375$856−$481
Owner-occupied90.9%82.1%+8.8 pts
Housing vacancy rate42.1%1.0%+41.1 pts
Rent-burdened households0.0%33.3%−33.3 pts
Average commute13.123.9−10.8
Worked from home0.0%10.5%−10.5 pts
Public transit to work0.0%0.0%Even
Uninsured0.0%3.7%−3.7 pts
Population, 2000 – 2025