COMPARING TWO PLACES
Hanska vs New Ulm
PLACE A
Hanska, Minnesota
VS
PLACE B
New Ulm, Texas
Hanska is 104% larger than New Ulm. Hanska earns more, with a median household income $10,052 higher.
HANSKANEW ULMDIFFERENCE
Total population378185+104% vs New Ulm
Population density1,53035+1,496
Population growth-5.0%––
Median age39.160.8−21.7
Male50.5%38.4%+12.1 pts
Female49.5%61.6%−12.1 pts
Foreign-born2.4%2.2%+0.2 pts
White, non-Hispanic94.7%97.8%−3.1 pts
Black0.0%0.0%Even
Hispanic / Latino1.8%2.2%−0.3 pts
Asian1.6%0.0%+1.6 pts
Other1.8%0.0%+1.8 pts
Median household income$70,000$59,948+$10,052
Per capita income$36,543$37,211−$668
Poverty rate13.2%12.4%+0.8 pts
Income inequality (Gini)0.4310.282+0.1
Bachelor's degree or higher9.8%5.7%+4.1 pts
Graduate degree3.7%0.0%+3.7 pts
Unemployment rate1.2%14.3%−13.1 pts
Labor force participation61.5%49.2%+12.3 pts
Median home value$89,500$248,500−$159,000
Median gross rent$608––
Owner-occupied83.1%56.9%+26.3 pts
Housing vacancy rate8.0%47.1%−39.1 pts
Rent-burdened households37.9%0.0%+37.9 pts
Average commute20.939.5−18.6
Worked from home5.4%0.0%+5.4 pts
Public transit to work0.0%0.0%Even
Uninsured2.6%0.0%+2.6 pts
Population, 2020 – 2024