CensusEasy
COMPARING TWO PLACES

Daingerfield vs Mount Pleasant

PLACE A
Daingerfield, Texas
VS
PLACE B
Mount Pleasant, Pennsylvania
Daingerfield is 38% smaller than Mount Pleasant. Daingerfield earns more, with a median household income $5,680 higher.
DAINGERFIELDMOUNT PLEASANTDIFFERENCE
Total population2,5394,108−38% vs Mount Pleasant
Population density1,0344,104−3,070
Population growth-1.5%-4.7%+3.2 pts
Median age36.351.0−14.7
Male44.2%45.3%−1.0 pts
Female55.8%54.7%+1.0 pts
Foreign-born7.1%1.1%+6.0 pts
White, non-Hispanic42.0%98.4%−56.4 pts
Black33.4%0.0%+33.4 pts
Hispanic / Latino19.3%0.3%+19.0 pts
Asian0.0%0.1%−0.1 pts
Other5.3%1.2%+4.1 pts
Median household income$57,500$51,820+$5,680
Per capita income$28,488$32,677−$4,189
Poverty rate17.5%11.1%+6.4 pts
Income inequality (Gini)0.4200.418Even
Bachelor's degree or higher16.4%17.7%−1.2 pts
Graduate degree6.0%4.8%+1.2 pts
Unemployment rate7.1%1.3%+5.9 pts
Labor force participation59.6%55.1%+4.5 pts
Median home value$100,200$143,000−$42,800
Median gross rent$920$721+$199
Owner-occupied60.4%65.8%−5.5 pts
Housing vacancy rate6.1%8.9%−2.9 pts
Rent-burdened households41.5%25.8%+15.6 pts
Average commute24.128.1−4.1
Worked from home5.4%11.0%−5.6 pts
Public transit to work0.0%0.1%−0.1 pts
Uninsured9.8%1.6%+8.2 pts
Population, 19902025
2K3K4K4K5K1990201020202025DaingerfieldMount Pleasant
Compare two other places