COMPARING TWO PLACES
Como vs Clinton
PLACE A
Como, Texas
VS
PLACE B
Clinton, South Carolina
Como is 90% smaller than Clinton. Como earns more, with a median household income $12,978 higher. Como has grown faster since 2000 (4% vs -10%).
COMOCLINTONDIFFERENCE
Total population7587,918−90% vs Clinton
Population density687758−71
Population growth3.7%-10.1%+13.8 pts
Median age35.630.6+5.0
Male46.1%42.4%+3.7 pts
Female53.9%57.6%−3.7 pts
Foreign-born23.5%2.2%+21.3 pts
White, non-Hispanic53.7%53.2%+0.6 pts
Black0.0%40.2%−40.2 pts
Hispanic / Latino42.9%1.6%+41.2 pts
Asian0.0%2.3%−2.3 pts
Other3.4%2.7%+0.7 pts
Median household income$57,500$44,522+$12,978
Per capita income$39,925$21,030+$18,895
Poverty rate26.0%27.7%−1.7 pts
Income inequality (Gini)0.6520.420+0.2
Bachelor's degree or higher6.2%31.4%−25.2 pts
Graduate degree2.2%11.7%−9.5 pts
Unemployment rate3.7%4.9%−1.2 pts
Labor force participation57.6%57.4%+0.2 pts
Median home value$169,800$173,400−$3,600
Median gross rent$955$899+$56
Owner-occupied66.1%51.5%+14.5 pts
Housing vacancy rate16.2%22.9%−6.7 pts
Rent-burdened households24.3%38.9%−14.6 pts
Average commute35.418.5+16.9
Worked from home1.3%2.3%−1.1 pts
Public transit to work0.0%1.1%−1.1 pts
Uninsured46.9%9.9%+37.0 pts
Population, 2000 – 2025