COMPARING TWO PLACES
Cambridge vs Kearney
PLACE A
Cambridge, Wisconsin
VS
PLACE B
Kearney, Missouri
Cambridge is 85% smaller than Kearney. Kearney earns more, with a median household income $15,705 higher. Kearney has grown faster since 2000 (24% vs 12%).
CAMBRIDGEKEARNEYDIFFERENCE
Total population1,67911,296−85% vs Kearney
Population density1,141847+293
Population growth12.4%24.1%−11.7 pts
Median age42.239.3+2.9
Male48.1%48.3%−0.2 pts
Female51.9%51.7%+0.2 pts
Foreign-born2.2%1.3%+0.8 pts
White, non-Hispanic94.5%94.1%+0.4 pts
Black0.0%0.1%−0.1 pts
Hispanic / Latino2.4%1.9%+0.5 pts
Asian1.1%0.8%+0.3 pts
Other2.1%3.1%−1.0 pts
Median household income$87,917$103,622−$15,705
Per capita income$46,199$52,009−$5,810
Poverty rate8.8%3.6%+5.2 pts
Income inequality (Gini)0.4010.421−0.0
Bachelor's degree or higher40.8%36.8%+4.0 pts
Graduate degree11.0%14.4%−3.4 pts
Unemployment rate2.7%2.6%+0.1 pts
Labor force participation70.1%71.4%−1.3 pts
Median home value$325,200$298,400+$26,800
Median gross rent$1,220$1,251−$31
Owner-occupied69.3%74.5%−5.2 pts
Housing vacancy rate8.2%2.0%+6.2 pts
Rent-burdened households40.1%41.6%−1.5 pts
Average commute25.123.5+1.5
Worked from home13.2%15.2%−2.0 pts
Public transit to work0.2%0.0%+0.2 pts
Uninsured4.5%2.2%+2.3 pts
Population, 1990 – 2025