COMPARING TWO PLACES
Census Tract 93.25 vs Census Tract 6.01
PLACE A
Census Tract 93.25, Miami-Dade County, Florida
VS
PLACE B
Census Tract 6.01, Utah County, Utah
Census Tract 93.25 is 43% smaller than Census Tract 6.01. Census Tract 6.01 earns more, with a median household income $16,371 higher.
CENSUS TRACT 93.25CENSUS TRACT 6.01DIFFERENCE
Total population2,5684,534−43% vs Census Tract 6.01
Population density10,8351,369+9,466
Median age39.728.5+11.2
Male49.3%51.7%−2.4 pts
Female50.7%48.3%+2.4 pts
Foreign-born67.8%5.2%+62.6 pts
White, non-Hispanic3.0%81.6%−78.7 pts
Black0.0%0.0%Even
Hispanic / Latino97.0%11.2%+85.8 pts
Asian0.0%3.6%−3.6 pts
Other0.0%3.6%−3.6 pts
Median household income$69,879$86,250−$16,371
Per capita income$29,979$35,602−$5,623
Poverty rate9.5%8.4%+1.2 pts
Income inequality (Gini)0.3120.405−0.1
Bachelor's degree or higher21.1%50.6%−29.5 pts
Graduate degree3.4%9.9%−6.5 pts
Unemployment rate9.0%7.4%+1.6 pts
Labor force participation76.4%64.2%+12.2 pts
Median home value$421,600$604,800−$183,200
Median gross rent$1,689$1,768−$79
Owner-occupied61.5%73.3%−11.8 pts
Housing vacancy rate2.0%2.3%−0.3 pts
Rent-burdened households97.1%48.4%+48.7 pts
Average commute25.121.2+3.9
Worked from home4.4%24.7%−20.3 pts
Public transit to work2.9%0.3%+2.7 pts
Uninsured25.2%3.3%+21.9 pts
Population, 2020 – 2024