COMPARING TWO PLACES
Census Tract 901 vs Census Tract 903.02
PLACE A
Census Tract 901, Kittson County, Minnesota
VS
PLACE B
Census Tract 903.02, Carver County, Minnesota
Census Tract 901 is 65% smaller than Census Tract 903.02. Census Tract 903.02 earns more, with a median household income $68,467 higher.
CENSUS TRACT 901CENSUS TRACT 903.02DIFFERENCE
Total population2,2556,366−65% vs Census Tract 903.02
Population density4720−717
Median age45.138.6+6.5
Male51.3%51.4%−0.1 pts
Female48.7%48.6%+0.1 pts
Foreign-born1.6%3.7%−2.1 pts
White, non-Hispanic93.7%88.5%+5.2 pts
Black0.0%0.4%−0.4 pts
Hispanic / Latino2.3%5.4%−3.1 pts
Asian0.4%0.2%+0.2 pts
Other3.6%5.6%−2.0 pts
Median household income$70,875$139,342−$68,467
Per capita income$38,657$53,063−$14,406
Poverty rate9.1%3.0%+6.1 pts
Income inequality (Gini)0.3880.334+0.1
Bachelor's degree or higher29.2%49.0%−19.8 pts
Graduate degree6.7%12.8%−6.2 pts
Unemployment rate3.9%4.6%−0.7 pts
Labor force participation61.7%82.9%−21.1 pts
Median home value$132,300$420,400−$288,100
Median gross rent$687$1,756−$1,069
Owner-occupied81.4%91.1%−9.7 pts
Housing vacancy rate23.3%0.1%+23.1 pts
Rent-burdened households22.1%13.0%+9.1 pts
Average commute22.225.2−3.1
Worked from home7.3%17.6%−10.3 pts
Public transit to work0.0%0.8%−0.8 pts
Uninsured3.1%3.1%Even
Population, 2020 – 2024