CensusEasy
COMPARING TWO PLACES

Census Tract 3770 vs Census Tract 202.05

PLACE A
Census Tract 3770, Contra Costa County, California
VS
PLACE B
Census Tract 202.05, Benton County, Minnesota
Census Tract 3770 is 129% larger than Census Tract 202.05. Census Tract 202.05 earns more, with a median household income $49,181 higher.
CENSUS TRACT 3770CENSUS TRACT 202.05DIFFERENCE
Total population7,8703,433+129% vs Census Tract 202.05
Population density16,362169+16,193
Median age36.644.2−7.6
Male48.5%49.4%−0.9 pts
Female51.5%50.6%+0.9 pts
Foreign-born47.6%0.0%+47.6 pts
White, non-Hispanic4.7%96.2%−91.5 pts
Black15.8%0.1%+15.8 pts
Hispanic / Latino71.0%0.9%+70.1 pts
Asian4.7%0.0%+4.7 pts
Other3.7%2.9%+0.9 pts
Median household income$49,837$99,018−$49,181
Per capita income$22,928$43,217−$20,289
Poverty rate22.8%6.6%+16.3 pts
Income inequality (Gini)0.4360.368+0.1
Bachelor's degree or higher10.6%28.0%−17.4 pts
Graduate degree4.4%5.3%−1.0 pts
Unemployment rate19.3%1.8%+17.5 pts
Labor force participation60.7%78.4%−17.7 pts
Median home value$525,600$318,200+$207,400
Median gross rent$1,379$959+$420
Owner-occupied42.3%95.3%−53.0 pts
Housing vacancy rate1.4%14.7%−13.3 pts
Rent-burdened households54.8%50.8%+4.0 pts
Average commute39.322.5+16.8
Worked from home10.8%8.5%+2.3 pts
Public transit to work11.9%0.0%+11.9 pts
Uninsured9.8%2.0%+7.8 pts
Population, 20202024
3K4K6K7K8K20202024Census Tract 3770Census Tract 202.05
Compare two other places