COMPARING TWO PLACES
Census Tract 301 vs Census Tract 310
PLACE A
Census Tract 301, Ramsey County, Minnesota
VS
PLACE B
Census Tract 310, Ramsey County, Minnesota
Census Tract 301 is 17% larger than Census Tract 310. Census Tract 301 earns more, with a median household income $26,129 higher.
CENSUS TRACT 301CENSUS TRACT 310DIFFERENCE
Total population4,8304,112+17% vs Census Tract 310
Population density4,55710,254−5,698
Median age35.029.6+5.4
Male49.6%49.9%−0.3 pts
Female50.4%50.1%+0.3 pts
Foreign-born9.5%28.4%−19.0 pts
White, non-Hispanic80.5%29.5%+51.0 pts
Black3.5%10.3%−6.8 pts
Hispanic / Latino4.3%8.2%−3.9 pts
Asian5.0%40.9%−35.8 pts
Other6.6%11.1%−4.5 pts
Median household income$97,014$70,885+$26,129
Per capita income$61,916$22,205+$39,711
Poverty rate5.7%25.5%−19.8 pts
Income inequality (Gini)0.4780.377+0.1
Bachelor's degree or higher78.0%13.5%+64.5 pts
Graduate degree46.5%7.0%+39.5 pts
Unemployment rate7.6%11.0%−3.4 pts
Labor force participation69.4%63.5%+5.9 pts
Median home value$484,400$221,300+$263,100
Median gross rent$1,227$1,213+$14
Owner-occupied59.0%43.3%+15.7 pts
Housing vacancy rate1.2%4.8%−3.6 pts
Rent-burdened households35.6%52.1%−16.5 pts
Average commute17.521.9−4.5
Worked from home21.4%12.2%+9.2 pts
Public transit to work8.0%9.0%−1.1 pts
Uninsured1.4%9.7%−8.3 pts
Population, 2020 – 2024