COMPARING TWO PLACES
Census Tract 215 vs Census Tract 64
PLACE A
Census Tract 215, Canyon County, Idaho
VS
PLACE B
Census Tract 64, Hamilton County, Ohio
Census Tract 215 is 107% larger than Census Tract 64. Census Tract 215 earns more, with a median household income $7,398 higher.
CENSUS TRACT 215CENSUS TRACT 64DIFFERENCE
Total population5,8582,830+107% vs Census Tract 64
Population density4,9692,376+2,592
Median age26.458.1−31.7
Male48.5%55.2%−6.7 pts
Female51.5%44.8%+6.7 pts
Foreign-born19.9%1.6%+18.2 pts
White, non-Hispanic52.3%10.5%+41.8 pts
Black1.5%85.6%−84.1 pts
Hispanic / Latino37.0%0.7%+36.3 pts
Asian1.5%0.0%+1.5 pts
Other7.7%3.3%+4.4 pts
Median household income$50,833$43,435+$7,398
Per capita income$21,323$30,551−$9,228
Poverty rate27.3%19.6%+7.7 pts
Income inequality (Gini)0.4510.383+0.1
Bachelor's degree or higher18.1%29.4%−11.3 pts
Graduate degree6.3%11.8%−5.5 pts
Unemployment rate9.6%11.9%−2.4 pts
Labor force participation62.4%64.0%−1.6 pts
Median home value$302,100$209,300+$92,800
Median gross rent$1,076$837+$239
Owner-occupied52.3%43.8%+8.5 pts
Housing vacancy rate11.3%8.3%+3.0 pts
Rent-burdened households64.7%51.0%+13.6 pts
Average commute22.427.1−4.7
Worked from home11.2%7.7%+3.5 pts
Public transit to work0.0%8.3%−8.3 pts
Uninsured15.6%7.9%+7.7 pts
Population, 2020 – 2024