COMPARING TWO PLACES
Census Tract 215 vs Census Tract 332
PLACE A
Census Tract 215, Canyon County, Idaho
VS
PLACE B
Census Tract 332, Ramsey County, Minnesota
Census Tract 215 is 32% larger than Census Tract 332. Census Tract 332 earns more, with a median household income $9,613 higher.
CENSUS TRACT 215CENSUS TRACT 332DIFFERENCE
Total population5,8584,435+32% vs Census Tract 332
Population density4,9696,018−1,049
Median age26.434.8−8.4
Male48.5%43.4%+5.2 pts
Female51.5%56.6%−5.2 pts
Foreign-born19.9%19.2%+0.7 pts
White, non-Hispanic52.3%52.7%−0.4 pts
Black1.5%20.0%−18.5 pts
Hispanic / Latino37.0%12.2%+24.7 pts
Asian1.5%9.4%−7.9 pts
Other7.7%5.7%+2.0 pts
Median household income$50,833$60,446−$9,613
Per capita income$21,323$42,240−$20,917
Poverty rate27.3%16.5%+10.8 pts
Income inequality (Gini)0.4510.513−0.1
Bachelor's degree or higher18.1%50.2%−32.1 pts
Graduate degree6.3%26.5%−20.1 pts
Unemployment rate9.6%4.0%+5.5 pts
Labor force participation62.4%64.1%−1.7 pts
Median home value$302,100$334,300−$32,200
Median gross rent$1,076$1,547−$471
Owner-occupied52.3%26.7%+25.6 pts
Housing vacancy rate11.3%13.0%−1.7 pts
Rent-burdened households64.7%55.2%+9.4 pts
Average commute22.423.5−1.1
Worked from home11.2%25.2%−14.0 pts
Public transit to work0.0%11.1%−11.1 pts
Uninsured15.6%5.8%+9.8 pts
Population, 2020 – 2024