CensusEasy
COMPARING TWO PLACES

Census Tract 215 vs Census Tract 212.01

PLACE A
Census Tract 215, Canyon County, Idaho
VS
PLACE B
Census Tract 212.01, Benton County, Minnesota
Census Tract 215 is 11% smaller than Census Tract 212.01. their median incomes are within a few thousand dollars.
CENSUS TRACT 215CENSUS TRACT 212.01DIFFERENCE
Total population5,8586,609−11% vs Census Tract 212.01
Population density4,9691,557+3,412
Median age26.429.7−3.3
Male48.5%54.3%−5.8 pts
Female51.5%45.7%+5.8 pts
Foreign-born19.9%12.5%+7.3 pts
White, non-Hispanic52.3%57.2%−4.9 pts
Black1.5%27.6%−26.0 pts
Hispanic / Latino37.0%4.6%+32.4 pts
Asian1.5%3.0%−1.5 pts
Other7.7%7.7%+0.1 pts
Median household income$50,833$49,032+$1,801
Per capita income$21,323$25,852−$4,529
Poverty rate27.3%25.4%+1.9 pts
Income inequality (Gini)0.4510.399+0.1
Bachelor's degree or higher18.1%26.7%−8.5 pts
Graduate degree6.3%6.5%−0.1 pts
Unemployment rate9.6%8.4%+1.2 pts
Labor force participation62.4%73.7%−11.3 pts
Median home value$302,100$224,400+$77,700
Median gross rent$1,076$946+$130
Owner-occupied52.3%30.8%+21.5 pts
Housing vacancy rate11.3%5.8%+5.5 pts
Rent-burdened households64.7%41.4%+23.3 pts
Average commute22.420.7+1.7
Worked from home11.2%4.8%+6.4 pts
Public transit to work0.0%1.0%−1.0 pts
Uninsured15.6%4.3%+11.3 pts
Population, 20202024
5K5K6K6K7K20202024Census Tract 215Census Tract 212.01
Compare two other places
Census Tract 215 vs Census Tract 212.01: side-by-side comparison · CensusEasy