COMPARING TWO PLACES
Census Tract 215 vs Census Tract 203.02
PLACE A
Census Tract 215, Canyon County, Idaho
VS
PLACE B
Census Tract 203.02, Hennepin County, Minnesota
Census Tract 215 is 108% larger than Census Tract 203.02. Census Tract 203.02 earns more, with a median household income $10,953 higher.
CENSUS TRACT 215CENSUS TRACT 203.02DIFFERENCE
Total population5,8582,817+108% vs Census Tract 203.02
Population density4,9696,045−1,076
Median age26.435.7−9.3
Male48.5%50.2%−1.6 pts
Female51.5%49.8%+1.6 pts
Foreign-born19.9%17.5%+2.3 pts
White, non-Hispanic52.3%27.9%+24.4 pts
Black1.5%40.1%−38.6 pts
Hispanic / Latino37.0%6.0%+31.0 pts
Asian1.5%19.6%−18.1 pts
Other7.7%6.4%+1.3 pts
Median household income$50,833$61,786−$10,953
Per capita income$21,323$28,264−$6,941
Poverty rate27.3%11.7%+15.6 pts
Income inequality (Gini)0.4510.419+0.0
Bachelor's degree or higher18.1%23.5%−5.3 pts
Graduate degree6.3%8.9%−2.6 pts
Unemployment rate9.6%2.7%+6.9 pts
Labor force participation62.4%70.5%−8.1 pts
Median home value$302,100$234,100+$68,000
Median gross rent$1,076$1,598−$522
Owner-occupied52.3%59.0%−6.6 pts
Housing vacancy rate11.3%5.5%+5.8 pts
Rent-burdened households64.7%70.8%−6.2 pts
Average commute22.421.2+1.2
Worked from home11.2%6.8%+4.5 pts
Public transit to work0.0%5.7%−5.7 pts
Uninsured15.6%8.3%+7.3 pts
Population, 2020 – 2024