COMPARING TWO PLACES
Census Tract 207 vs Census Tract 218.01
PLACE A
Census Tract 207, Clay County, Minnesota
VS
PLACE B
Census Tract 218.01, Canyon County, Idaho
Census Tract 207 is 43% smaller than Census Tract 218.01. Census Tract 218.01 earns more, with a median household income $5,256 higher.
CENSUS TRACT 207CENSUS TRACT 218.01DIFFERENCE
Total population2,5394,461−43% vs Census Tract 218.01
Population density3,576121+3,455
Median age38.344.7−6.4
Male52.2%49.4%+2.8 pts
Female47.8%50.6%−2.8 pts
Foreign-born1.1%4.7%−3.6 pts
White, non-Hispanic81.1%64.2%+17.0 pts
Black1.1%0.1%+1.0 pts
Hispanic / Latino14.6%24.5%−9.9 pts
Asian0.0%3.4%−3.4 pts
Other3.2%7.8%−4.7 pts
Median household income$61,163$66,419−$5,256
Per capita income$33,728$30,602+$3,126
Poverty rate8.8%16.3%−7.5 pts
Income inequality (Gini)0.4190.399+0.0
Bachelor's degree or higher30.1%18.8%+11.3 pts
Graduate degree7.2%5.2%+2.0 pts
Unemployment rate3.5%3.2%+0.2 pts
Labor force participation59.7%59.3%+0.4 pts
Median home value$177,900$425,600−$247,700
Median gross rent$623$1,303−$680
Owner-occupied67.4%85.7%−18.4 pts
Housing vacancy rate7.4%2.0%+5.4 pts
Rent-burdened households52.2%38.9%+13.3 pts
Average commute19.022.8−3.8
Worked from home8.9%7.3%+1.6 pts
Public transit to work5.7%0.0%+5.7 pts
Uninsured3.9%6.4%−2.5 pts
Population, 2020 – 2024