COMPARING TWO PLACES
Census Tract 2 vs Census Tract 6.01
PLACE A
Census Tract 2, Tuscola County, Michigan
VS
PLACE B
Census Tract 6.01, Utah County, Utah
Census Tract 2 is 31% smaller than Census Tract 6.01. Census Tract 6.01 earns more, with a median household income $9,925 higher.
CENSUS TRACT 2CENSUS TRACT 6.01DIFFERENCE
Total population3,1424,534−31% vs Census Tract 6.01
Population density291,369−1,340
Median age45.728.5+17.2
Male51.2%51.7%−0.5 pts
Female48.8%48.3%+0.5 pts
Foreign-born0.6%5.2%−4.7 pts
White, non-Hispanic92.1%81.6%+10.5 pts
Black0.8%0.0%+0.8 pts
Hispanic / Latino4.3%11.2%−6.9 pts
Asian0.0%3.6%−3.6 pts
Other2.7%3.6%−0.8 pts
Median household income$76,325$86,250−$9,925
Per capita income$38,613$35,602+$3,011
Poverty rate9.2%8.4%+0.8 pts
Income inequality (Gini)0.4130.405Even
Bachelor's degree or higher12.8%50.6%−37.8 pts
Graduate degree3.9%9.9%−6.0 pts
Unemployment rate1.9%7.4%−5.5 pts
Labor force participation53.2%64.2%−11.0 pts
Median home value$122,200$604,800−$482,600
Median gross rent$920$1,768−$848
Owner-occupied85.8%73.3%+12.5 pts
Housing vacancy rate10.8%2.3%+8.5 pts
Rent-burdened households41.3%48.4%−7.1 pts
Average commute25.521.2+4.3
Worked from home6.3%24.7%−18.4 pts
Public transit to work0.0%0.3%−0.3 pts
Uninsured6.3%3.3%+3.0 pts
Population, 2020 – 2024