CensusEasy
COMPARING TWO PLACES

Census Tract 112 vs Census Tract 351

PLACE A
Census Tract 112, Saginaw County, Michigan
VS
PLACE B
Census Tract 351, Ramsey County, Minnesota
Census Tract 112 is 44% smaller than Census Tract 351. Census Tract 351 earns more, with a median household income $8,293 higher.
CENSUS TRACT 112CENSUS TRACT 351DIFFERENCE
Total population1,9673,491−44% vs Census Tract 351
Population density559,538−9,483
Median age40.921.8+19.1
Male52.9%43.4%+9.5 pts
Female47.1%56.6%−9.5 pts
Foreign-born0.1%11.0%−10.9 pts
White, non-Hispanic97.7%75.5%+22.1 pts
Black0.2%2.8%−2.6 pts
Hispanic / Latino1.8%4.8%−3.0 pts
Asian0.0%9.6%−9.6 pts
Other0.3%7.2%−6.9 pts
Median household income$86,979$95,272−$8,293
Per capita income$41,760$45,273−$3,513
Poverty rate2.6%8.6%−6.0 pts
Income inequality (Gini)0.3460.470−0.1
Bachelor's degree or higher31.9%74.5%−42.5 pts
Graduate degree10.6%38.3%−27.8 pts
Unemployment rate1.7%5.2%−3.5 pts
Labor force participation66.3%64.1%+2.3 pts
Median home value$227,500$569,400−$341,900
Median gross rent$950$1,315−$365
Owner-occupied94.4%58.8%+35.5 pts
Housing vacancy rate5.9%1.6%+4.3 pts
Rent-burdened households29.5%41.1%−11.5 pts
Average commute23.514.6+8.9
Worked from home10.5%20.6%−10.1 pts
Public transit to work0.0%4.0%−4.0 pts
Uninsured2.5%1.3%+1.2 pts
Population, 20202024
2K2K3K3K4K20202024Census Tract 112Census Tract 351
Compare two other places