CensusEasy
COMPARING TWO PLACES

Census Tract 111 vs Census Tract 9802

PLACE A
Census Tract 111, Saginaw County, Michigan
VS
PLACE B
Census Tract 9802, Utah County, Utah
Census Tract 111 is 41% smaller than Census Tract 9802. Census Tract 111 earns more, with a median household income $23,712 higher.
CENSUS TRACT 111CENSUS TRACT 9802DIFFERENCE
Total population1,4792,525−41% vs Census Tract 9802
Population density5710,141−10,084
Median age44.423.3+21.1
Male46.3%47.2%−0.9 pts
Female53.7%52.8%+0.9 pts
Foreign-born0.0%9.5%−9.5 pts
White, non-Hispanic80.7%83.2%−2.6 pts
Black6.9%2.0%+4.9 pts
Hispanic / Latino9.3%8.8%+0.6 pts
Asian0.0%3.8%−3.8 pts
Other3.1%2.2%+0.9 pts
Median household income$53,558$29,846+$23,712
Per capita income$27,212$12,819+$14,393
Poverty rate23.6%36.8%−13.2 pts
Income inequality (Gini)0.3830.336+0.0
Bachelor's degree or higher9.8%55.8%−46.0 pts
Graduate degree1.1%8.9%−7.8 pts
Unemployment rate5.3%3.6%+1.7 pts
Labor force participation56.0%80.7%−24.6 pts
Median home value$109,100
Median gross rent$923$951−$28
Owner-occupied87.5%0.0%+87.5 pts
Housing vacancy rate12.1%0.0%+12.1 pts
Rent-burdened households48.1%70.4%−22.3 pts
Average commute21.917.2+4.7
Worked from home9.5%20.1%−10.5 pts
Public transit to work0.0%11.8%−11.8 pts
Uninsured11.2%5.1%+6.1 pts
Population, 20202024
1K2K2K3K4K20202024Census Tract 111Census Tract 9802
Compare two other places