COMPARING TWO PLACES
Census Tract 111 vs Census Tract 218.01
PLACE A
Census Tract 111, Saginaw County, Michigan
VS
PLACE B
Census Tract 218.01, Canyon County, Idaho
Census Tract 111 is 67% smaller than Census Tract 218.01. Census Tract 218.01 earns more, with a median household income $12,861 higher.
CENSUS TRACT 111CENSUS TRACT 218.01DIFFERENCE
Total population1,4794,461−67% vs Census Tract 218.01
Population density57121−64
Median age44.444.7−0.3
Male46.3%49.4%−3.1 pts
Female53.7%50.6%+3.1 pts
Foreign-born0.0%4.7%−4.7 pts
White, non-Hispanic80.7%64.2%+16.5 pts
Black6.9%0.1%+6.8 pts
Hispanic / Latino9.3%24.5%−15.1 pts
Asian0.0%3.4%−3.4 pts
Other3.1%7.8%−4.7 pts
Median household income$53,558$66,419−$12,861
Per capita income$27,212$30,602−$3,390
Poverty rate23.6%16.3%+7.3 pts
Income inequality (Gini)0.3830.399−0.0
Bachelor's degree or higher9.8%18.8%−8.9 pts
Graduate degree1.1%5.2%−4.1 pts
Unemployment rate5.3%3.2%+2.1 pts
Labor force participation56.0%59.3%−3.2 pts
Median home value$109,100$425,600−$316,500
Median gross rent$923$1,303−$380
Owner-occupied87.5%85.7%+1.7 pts
Housing vacancy rate12.1%2.0%+10.2 pts
Rent-burdened households48.1%38.9%+9.3 pts
Average commute21.922.8−0.9
Worked from home9.5%7.3%+2.2 pts
Public transit to work0.0%0.0%Even
Uninsured11.2%6.4%+4.8 pts
Population, 2020 – 2024