COMPARING TWO PLACES
Census Tract 1101 vs Census Tract 1122.02
PLACE A
Census Tract 1101, Chisago County, Minnesota
VS
PLACE B
Census Tract 1122.02, Salt Lake County, Utah
Census Tract 1101 is 11% larger than Census Tract 1122.02. Census Tract 1101 earns more, with a median household income $14,927 higher.
CENSUS TRACT 1101CENSUS TRACT 1122.02DIFFERENCE
Total population4,3523,925+11% vs Census Tract 1122.02
Population density622,703−2,641
Median age45.538.3+7.2
Male51.4%52.2%−0.7 pts
Female48.6%47.8%+0.7 pts
Foreign-born1.5%10.5%−9.0 pts
White, non-Hispanic93.5%75.9%+17.6 pts
Black0.7%0.7%Even
Hispanic / Latino1.9%14.6%−12.7 pts
Asian0.6%2.9%−2.3 pts
Other3.2%5.9%−2.7 pts
Median household income$111,618$96,691+$14,927
Per capita income$48,667$46,545+$2,122
Poverty rate5.1%3.1%+1.9 pts
Income inequality (Gini)0.3800.368+0.0
Bachelor's degree or higher25.7%35.0%−9.2 pts
Graduate degree6.9%8.4%−1.5 pts
Unemployment rate4.1%4.2%−0.1 pts
Labor force participation64.0%75.6%−11.6 pts
Median home value$403,100$431,300−$28,200
Median gross rent$1,673$1,553+$120
Owner-occupied94.2%71.6%+22.7 pts
Housing vacancy rate20.6%3.6%+17.1 pts
Rent-burdened households58.9%30.2%+28.7 pts
Average commute34.421.6+12.9
Worked from home14.3%25.7%−11.4 pts
Public transit to work0.2%1.5%−1.3 pts
Uninsured2.5%7.0%−4.5 pts
Population, 2020 – 2024