CensusEasy
COMPARING TWO PLACES

Census Tract 103 vs Census Tract 9683.02

PLACE A
Census Tract 103, Van Buren County, Michigan
VS
PLACE B
Census Tract 9683.02, Uintah County, Utah
Census Tract 103 is 58% smaller than Census Tract 9683.02. Census Tract 9683.02 earns more, with a median household income $12,425 higher.
CENSUS TRACT 103CENSUS TRACT 9683.02DIFFERENCE
Total population2,0434,877−58% vs Census Tract 9683.02
Population density1,49210+1,482
Median age63.937.4+26.5
Male46.8%52.3%−5.5 pts
Female53.2%47.7%+5.5 pts
Foreign-born4.6%1.3%+3.3 pts
White, non-Hispanic89.5%86.1%+3.4 pts
Black3.5%2.9%+0.6 pts
Hispanic / Latino0.7%3.0%−2.3 pts
Asian1.2%1.3%−0.2 pts
Other5.2%6.7%−1.5 pts
Median household income$85,234$97,659−$12,425
Per capita income$59,268$38,706+$20,562
Poverty rate13.8%8.6%+5.2 pts
Income inequality (Gini)0.4820.378+0.1
Bachelor's degree or higher48.8%25.0%+23.8 pts
Graduate degree22.5%6.5%+16.0 pts
Unemployment rate0.5%0.8%−0.3 pts
Labor force participation54.3%63.9%−9.6 pts
Median home value$513,500$356,500+$157,000
Median gross rent$898$1,346−$448
Owner-occupied72.4%88.2%−15.8 pts
Housing vacancy rate50.3%6.6%+43.6 pts
Rent-burdened households42.4%0.0%+42.4 pts
Average commute21.024.9−3.9
Worked from home20.6%16.2%+4.5 pts
Public transit to work0.0%0.0%Even
Uninsured4.9%5.3%−0.4 pts
Population, 20202024
2K3K3K4K5K20202024Census Tract 103Census Tract 9683.02
Compare two other places